Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T20:35:18.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Post-stapedectomy reparative granuloma: a misnomer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

J. E. Fenton ,
J. Turner ,
A. Shirazi  and
P. A. Fagan
J. E. Fenton
Affiliation:
Departments of Otology/Neuro-Otology, St Vincents Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
J. Turner
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomical Pathology, St Vincents Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
A. Shirazi
Affiliation:
Departments of Otology/Neuro-Otology, St Vincents Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
P. A. Fagan*
Affiliation:
Departments of Otology/Neuro-Otology, St Vincents Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
*
Address for correspondence: Dr P. A. Fagan, 352 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, N.S.W., 2010, Australia. Fax: 61(2) 360 5419
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The pathophysiology of so-called ‘reparative granuloma’ occurring after stapedectomy has not been determined and universally accepted management of this rare complication has not yet been established. A case is presented in which a mass developed in the middle ear after the use of a fat/wire prosthesis in a stapedectomy. Histological assessment revealed nonspecific granulation tissue and fat necrosis. It is suggested that ‘reparative granuloma’ is a misnomer as there is no microscopic evidence in this case nor in the literature of granulomatous formation. The condition may follow stapedectomy or stapedotomy. Furthermore, the name leads to confusion with a different condition, giant cell reparative granuloma, which involves the jaws and rarely the temporal bone. An alternative name, ‘Stapes surgery induced granulation tissue’ (SSIG) is therefore suggested for this condition.

Keywords

Stapes surgery, complicationsGranuloma
Type
Pathology in Focus
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 110 , Issue 2 , February 1996 , pp. 185 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cotran, R. S., Kumar, V., Robbins, S. L., Schoen, F. J. (1994) Inflammation and repair. In Pathologic Basis of Disease. (Robbins) 5th Edition. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 51–92.Google Scholar
Gacek, R. R. (1970) The diagnosis and treatment of poststapedectomy granuloma. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 79: 970–975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hough, J. V. D., Dyer, R. K. Jr (1993) Stapedectomy, causes of failure and revision surgery in otosclerosis. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 26(3): 453–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, R. S., Schuknecht, H. F. (1967) Reparative granuloma following stapedectomy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 76: 1008–1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seicshnaydre, M. A., Sismanis, A., Hughes, G. B. (1994) Update of reparative granuloma: survey of the American Otological Society and the American Neurotology Society. American Journal of Otology 15(2): 155–160.Google ScholarPubMed
Swartz, J. D., Lansman, A. K., Berger, A. S., Wolfson, R. J., Bell, G., Popky, G. L., Swartz, N. G. (1986) Stapes prosthesis: evaluation with CT. Radiology 158: 179–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiet, R. J., Harvey, S. T., Bauer, G. P. (1993) Complications in stapes surgery, options for prevention and management. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 26(3): 471–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed