Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:45:07.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What do we call money? An appraisal of the money or non-money view

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2019

Cristian Frasser Open the ORCID record for Cristian Frasser [Opens in a new window]  and
Gabriel Guzmán
Cristian Frasser
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
Gabriel Guzmán
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Finance, Universidad del Tolima, Ibagué, Colombia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Part of the debate fueled by cryptocurrencies has revolved around the question of what we call money. This paper identifies two traditions in monetary theory that have tried to answer that question. On the one hand, the money or non-money view follows a strategy proposed by a version of philosophical essentialism, in which there is a set of defining characteristics of money that make it categorically different from other things used in transactions. On the other hand, the liquidity degree view emphasizes that the multiple objects that circulate as a means of payment differ in their degree of acceptability. Since there is no absolute standard of liquidity, a precise dividing line between money and non-money cannot be drawn. We challenge the money or non-money view, arguing that there is nothing in the nature of money that can be interpreted as a natural kind essence by which money can be categorically separated from non-money.

Keywords

Essentialismmoneybitcoinliquidity
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 25 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Álvarez, A. and Bignon, V. (2013), ‘L. Walras and C. Menger: Two Ways on the Path of Modern Monetary Theory’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 20(1): 89–124.Google Scholar
Andolfatto, D. (2016), Is Bitcoin a Safe Asset? MacroMania, available at http://andolfatto.blogspot.com/2016/03/is-bitcoin-safe-asset.html (accessed 5 July 2018)Google Scholar
Barnett, W. A. (1980), ‘Economic Monetary Aggregates: An Application of Aggregation and Index Number Theory’, Journal of Econometrics, 14(1): 11–48.Google Scholar
Barnett, W. A. (1982), ‘The Optimal Level of Monetary Aggregation’, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 14(4): 687–710.Google Scholar
Bell, S. (2001), ‘The Role of the State and the Hierarchy of Money’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25(2): 149–163.Google Scholar
Berentsen, A. and Schär, F. (2018), ‘A Short Introduction to the World of Cryptocurrencies’, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 100(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Bird, A. and Tobin, E., Spring (2018) Edition, ‘Natural Kinds’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-kinds/ (accessed 15 August 2018).Google Scholar
Boyd, R. (1999), ‘Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa’, in Wilson, R. A. (eds), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 145–185.Google Scholar
Brigandt, I. (2011), ‘Natural Kinds and Concepts: A Pragmatist and Methodologically Naturalistic Account’, in Knowles, J. and Rydenfelt, H. (eds), Pragmatism, Science and Naturalism, Berlin: Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 171–196.Google Scholar
Burdett, K., Trejos, A. and Wright, R. (2001), ‘Cigarette Money’, Journal of Economic Theory, 99(1–2): 117–142.Google Scholar
Burgess, S. and Janssen, N. (2007), ‘Proposals to Modify the Measurement of Broad Money in the United Kingdom: A User Consultation’, Quarterly Bulletin, Q3: 402–414.Google Scholar
Carstens, A. (2018), ‘Money in the Digital Age: What Role for Central Banks?’ BIS Speech, 1.Google Scholar
Cartelier, J. (1985), ‘Théorie de la valeur ou hétérodoxie monétaire: les termes d'un choix’, Economie appliquée, 1: 63–82.Google Scholar
Clower, R. (1967), ‘A Reconsideration of the Microfundations of Monetary Theory’, Economic Inquiry, 6(1): 1–8.Google Scholar
Cramp, A. (1962), ‘Two Views on Money’, Lloyds Bank Review, 65: 1–15.Google Scholar
Doepke, M. and Schneider, M. (2017), ‘Money as a Unit of Account’, Econometrica, 85(5): 1537–1574.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. (2001), ‘Learning to Speculate: Experiments with Artificial and Real Agents’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25(3–4): 295–319.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. and Ochs, J. (1999), ‘Emergence of Money as a Medium of Exchange: An Experimental Study’, American Economic Review, 89(4): 847–877.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. and Ochs, J. (2002), ‘Intrinsically Worthless Objects as Media of Exchange: Experimental Evidence’, International Economic Review, 43(3): 637–673.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. ([2002] 2014), The Philosophy of Nature: A Guide to the New Essentialism, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, M., Fall (2017) Edition, ‘Species’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/species/ (accessed 22 January 2019).Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, A. (2008), ‘Support for Euro in Doubt as Germans Reject Latin Bloc Notes’, The Telegraph, available at https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/2791587/Support-for-euro-in-doubt-as-Germans-reject-Latin-bloc-notes.html (accessed 1 March 2018).Google Scholar
Foley, D. (1987), ‘Money in Economic Activity’, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds), The New Palgrave: Money, New York: Norton, pp. 519–525.Google Scholar
Fox, J. (2017), ‘What's the Value of Bitcoin? Who Knows? Bloomberg, available at https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-12-11/what-s-the-value-of-bitcoin-who-knows (accessed 10 August 2018).Google Scholar
Friedman, M. ed. (1956), Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money – A Restatement, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. and Schwartz, A. J. (1970), Monetary Statistics of the United States: Estimates, Sources, Methods, Chicago, IL: NBER.Google Scholar
Graeber, D. (2011), Debt: The First 5000 Years, New York: Melville House.Google Scholar
Gramley, L. and Chase, S. (1965), ‘Time Deposits in Monetary Analysis’, Federal Reserve Bulletin, 51: 1380–1404.Google Scholar
Guala, F. (2016a), ‘Epstein on Anchors and Grounds’, Journal of Social Ontology, 2(1): 135–147.Google Scholar
Guala, F. (2016b), Understanding Institutions. The Science and Philosophy of Living Together, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1991), ‘A Tradition of Natural Kinds’, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 61: 109–126.Google Scholar
Hawley, K. and Bird, A. (2011), ‘What Are Natural Kinds?’ Philosophical Perspectives, 25: 205–221.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. ([1976] 1990), Denationalisation of Money-The Argument Refined. An Analysis of the Theory and Practice of Concurrent Currencies (3rd edn), London: s.n.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, J. (2014), ‘Redundancy or Mismeasurement? A Reappraisal of Money’, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 18(7): 1437–1465.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. (1935), ‘A Suggestion for Simplifying the Theory of Money’, Economica, 2(5): 1–19.Google Scholar
Hoover, K. (1996), ‘Some Suggestions for Complicating the Theory of Money’, in Pressman, S. (ed.), Interactions in political economy: Malvern After Ten Years, London: Routledge, pp. 204–216.Google Scholar
Ingham, G. (2004), ‘The Nature of Money’, Economic Sociology: European Electronic Newsletter, 5(2): 18–28.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2016), Monetary and Financial Statistics Manual and Compilation Guide, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. ([1936] 1949), The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Khalidi, M. (2013), ‘Kinds (Natural Kinds vs. Human Kinds)’, in Kaldis, B. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences, Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp. 515–518.Google Scholar
Kharif, O. (2018), Bitcoin's Use in Commerce Keeps Falling Even as Volatility Eases, Bloomberg, available at https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-08-01/bitcoin-s-use-in-commerce-keeps-falling-even-as-volatility-eases (accessed 10 August 2018).Google Scholar
Kiyotaki, N. and Wright, R. (1989), ‘On Money as a Medium of Exchange’, Journal of Political Economy, 97(4): 927–954.Google Scholar
Kiyotaki, N. and Wright, R. (1991), ‘A Contribution to the Pure Theory of Money’, Journal of Economic Theory, 53: 215–235.Google Scholar
Kiyotaki, N. and Wright, R. (1992), ‘Acceptability, Means of Payment, and Media of Exchange’, Quarterly Review. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 16(3): 18–21.Google Scholar
Knapp, G. (1924), The State Theory of Money, London: Macmillan and Company Limited.Google Scholar
Koning, J. (2013), ‘Best Buddies: Keynes and Hayek on Moneyness’, Moneyness, available at http://jpkoning.blogspot.com/2013/01/best-buddies-keynes-hayek-on-moneyness.html (accessed 10 July 2018).Google Scholar
Koning, J. (2018), ‘Playing Bitcoin: Remember, It's Just a Game’, Breaker, available at https://breakermag.com/play-bitcoin-remember-its-just-a-game/ (accessed 22 October 2018).Google Scholar
Ladyman, J. and Ross, D. (2007), Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lagos, R. and Wright, R. (2005), ‘A Unified Framework for Monetary Theory and Policy Analysis’, Journal of Political Economy, 113(3): 463–484.Google Scholar
Lagos, R., Rocheteau, G. and Wright, R. (2017), ‘Liquidity: A New Monetarist Perspective’, Journal of Economic Literature, 55(2): 371–440.Google Scholar
Lotz, S. and Rocheteau, G. (2002), ‘On the Launching of a New Currency’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 34(3): 563–588.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. (2007), ‘A Problem for a Posteriori Essentialism Concerning Natural Kinds’, Analysis, 67(4): 286–292.Google Scholar
Mäki, U. (1990), ‘Mengerian Economics in Realist Perspective’, Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy, 22: 289–312.Google Scholar
Marshall, D. and Weatherson, B., Spring (2018) Edition, ‘Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Properties’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/intrinsic-extrinsic/ (accessed 2 February 2019).Google Scholar
Marx, K. ([1867] 1906), Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, New York: Modern Library/Random House.Google Scholar
Menger, C. (1892), ‘On the Origin of Money’, Economic Journal, 2(6): 239–255.Google Scholar
Minsky, H. ([1986] 2008), Stabilizing an Unstable Economy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nersisyan, Y. and Dantas, F. (2017), ‘Rethinking Liquidity Creation: Banks, Shadow Banks and the Elasticity of Finance’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 40(3): 279–299.Google Scholar
Newlyn, W. T. (1964), ‘The Supply of Money and Its Control’, Economic Journal, 74(294): 327–346.Google Scholar
Pesek, B. and Saving, T. (1967), Money, Wealth, and Economic Theory, New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Committee, Radcliffe (1959), Report of the Radcliffe Committee on the Working of the Monetary System, London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Cmd. 827.Google Scholar
Rocheteau, G. and Nosal, E. (2017). Money, Payments, and Liquidity (2nd edn), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. (1958), ‘An Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest with or without the Social Contrivance of Money’, Journal of Political Economy, 66(6): 467–482.Google Scholar
Sayers, R. (1960), ‘Monetary Thought and Monetary Policy in England’, Economic Journal, 70(280): 710–724.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1954), History of Economics Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–1260.Google Scholar
Selgin, G. (1994), ‘On Ensuring the Acceptability of a New Fiat Money’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 26(4): 808–826.Google Scholar
Semenova, A. (2011), ‘Would You Barter with God? Why Holy Debts and Not Profane Markets Created Money’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 70(2): 376–400.Google Scholar
Shi, S. (1995), ‘Money and Prices: A Model of Search and Bargaining’, Journal of Economic Theory, 67(2): 467–496.Google Scholar
Smit, J., Buekens, F. and Du Plessis, S. (2011), ‘What is Money? An Alternative to Searle's Institutional Facts’, Economics and Philosophy, 27(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Smit, J., Buekens, F. and Du Plessis, S. (2016), ‘Cigarettes, Dollars and Bitcoins – An Essay on The ontology of Money’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(2): 327–347.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (1990), ‘Aristotle, Menger, Mises: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Economics’, Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy, 22: 263–287.Google Scholar
Smithin, J. (2000), What Is Money? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tahko, T. (2015), ‘Natural Kind Essentialism Revisited’, Mind, 124(495): 795–822.Google Scholar
Trejos, A. and Wright, R. (1995), ‘Search, Bargaining, Money, and Prices’, Journal of Political Economy, 103(1): 118–141.Google Scholar
Wallace, N. (2008), ‘Fiat Money’, in Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2nd edn), Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. (2009), Species: A History of the Idea, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, S. (2018), ‘Is Bitcoin a Waste of Resources?’ New Monetarist Economics, available at http://newmonetarism.blogspot.com/2018/01/is-bitcoin-waste-of-resources.html (accessed December 2018).Google Scholar
Williamson, S. and Wright, R. (2010a), ‘New Monetarist Economics: Models’, in Friedman, B. and Woodford, M. (eds), Handbook of Monetary Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 26–94.Google Scholar
Williamson, S. and Wright, R. (2010b), ‘New Monetarist Economics: Methods’, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 92(4): 265–302.Google Scholar
Wray, R. (2014), ‘From the State Theory of Money to Modern Money Theory: An Alternative to Economic Orthodoxy’, Working Paper, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, 792: 1–34.Google Scholar
Yeager, L. (1968), ‘Essential Properties of the Medium of Exchange’, Kyklos, International Review for Social Sciences, 21(1): 45–69.Google Scholar