Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T16:17:49.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

If you can do it for free, there's some way to do it for money

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2020

Jason Brennan*
Affiliation:
McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, WashingtonDC, USA
Peter Jaworski
Affiliation:
McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, WashingtonDC, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: jb896@georgetown.edu

Abstract

Markets without Limits defends the claim that there are no inherent limits to markets, in the sense that if something may permissibly be given away or exchanged outside of market or for free, then there is some realistic and plausible way of structuring a market that makes it morally permissible to exchange it for money. This paper reviews the basic strategy of the book, and then responds to criticisms from Geoffrey Hodgson's recent review. Hodgson claims to have identified counterexamples to our main thesis, which we dispute.

Type
Comment
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, C. and Bartels, L. (2016), Democracy for Realists, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, J. (2009), ‘Polluting the Polls: When Citizens Should Not Vote’, Austrasian Journal of Philosophy, 87: 535549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, J. and Jaworski, P. (2015), ‘Markets Without Symbolic Limits’, Ethics, 125: 10531077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, J. and Jaworski, P. (2016), Markets Without Limits, New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, J. and Jaworski, P. (2018), ‘Come On, Come On, Love Me for the Money’, Business Ethics Review Journal, 6: 3035.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2020), ‘On the Limits of Markets’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413742000034X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, D. and Kalmoe, N. (2017), Neither Liberal nor Conservative, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mason, L. (2017), Uncivil Disagreement, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. (2000), ‘Coping with Trade-Offs: Psychological Constraints and Political Implications’, in Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. D., and Popkin, S. L. (eds), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar