Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T15:32:02.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Firms as social actors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2010

RICHARD ADELSTEIN
RICHARD ADELSTEIN*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut, USA
*
*Email: radelstein@wesleyan.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This essay asks what firms are, whether they are ‘real’ social actors, and whether their actions can be traced without remainder to the actions of living people or whether there is some irreducible aspect of their existence or operation that must be attributed to the organization itself. It describes firms as ongoing, multilateral relational contracts from whose operation – that is, from performance over time by specific individuals in the roles and relationships defined by the contract – emerge the firm's idiosyncratic routines and capabilities. It emphasizes the role of entrepreneurs in the creation of firms and the close dependence of organizational capabilities on human performance, and argues that this account is consistent with a reasonable individualism that allows for social outcomes to be determined by the actions and interaction of individuals. It then proposes that firms are nonetheless institutional facts and thus ontologically subjective but epistemically objective components of reality, and concludes with directions for future work.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 329 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelstein, Richard (2005), ‘Knowledge and Power in the Mechanical Firm: Planning for Profit in Austrian Perspective’, Review of Austrian Economics, 18: 55–82.Google Scholar
Alchian, Armen A. and Demsetz, Harold (1972), ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’, American Economic Review, 62: 777–795.Google Scholar
Blair, Margaret M. (2003), ‘Locking in Capital: What Corporate Law Achieved for Business Organizers in the Nineteenth Century’, UCLA Law Review, 51: 387–455.Google Scholar
ChandlerAlfred D., Jr. Alfred D., Jr. (1977), The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
ChandlerAlfred D., Jr. Alfred D., Jr. (1984), ‘The Emergence of Managerial Capitalism’, Business History Review, 58: 473–503.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. (1937), ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica, 4: 386–405.Google Scholar
Commons, John R. (1968 [1924]), Legal Foundations of Capitalism, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1980 [1970]), ‘Mental Events’, in Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 207–225.Google Scholar
Davis, John P. (1897), ‘The Nature of Corporations’, Political Science Quarterly, 12: 273–294.Google Scholar
Dow, Gregory K. (1987), ‘The Function of Authority in Transaction Cost Economics’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 8: 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H. and Fischel, Daniel R. (1985), ‘Limited Liability and the Corporation’, University of Chicago Law Review, 52: 89–117.Google Scholar
Foss, Nicolai J. (1993), ‘Theories of the Firm: Contractual and Competence Perspectives’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 3: 127–144.Google Scholar
Foss, Nicolai J. (2003), ‘Bounded Rationality and Tacit Knowledge in the Organizational Capabilities Approach: An Assessment and a Re-evaluation’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12: 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gierke, Otto von (1987 [1900]), Political Theories of the Middle Age, translated with an introduction by Maitland, Frederick W., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gindis, David (2007), ‘Some Building Blocks for a Theory of the Firm as a Real Entity’, in Biondi, Yuri, Canziani, Arnaldo, and Kirat, Thierry (eds.), The Firm as an Entity: Implications for Economics, Accounting and Law, New York: Routledge, pp. 266–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gindis, David (2009), ‘From Fictions and Aggregates to Real Entities in the Theory of the Firm’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 5: 25–46.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1945), ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’, American Economic Review, 35: 519–530.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (2003), ‘The Hidden Persuaders: Institutions and Individuals in Economic Theory’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27: 159–175.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (2007), ‘Meanings of Methodological Individualism’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 14: 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, Kevin D. (2009), ‘Microfoundations and the Ontology of Macroeconomics’, in Kincaid, Harold and Ross, Donald (eds.), Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Economic Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 386–409.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. (1985), ‘Santa Clara Revisited: The Development of Corporate Theory’, West Virginia Law Review, 88: 173–224.Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael C. and Meckling, William H. (1976), ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Capital Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon (1993), Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirzner, Israel M. (1973), Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N. (1992), ‘Transaction-cost Economics in Real Time’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 1: 99–127.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N. (2003), ‘The Vanishing Hand: The Changing Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12: 351–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlois, Richard N. and Robertson, Paul L. (1995), Firms, Markets and Economic Change: A Dynamic Theory of Business Institutions, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lazonick, William (1991), Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macneil, Ian R. (1978), ‘Contracts: Adjustment of Long-Term Economic Relations under Classical, Neoclassical, and Relational Contract Law’, Northwestern University Law Review, 72: 854–906.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Lee (2007), ‘Emergence and Reduction in Chemistry: Ontological or Epistemological Concepts?’, Synthese, 155: 337–343.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Brian and Bennett, Karen (2008), ‘Supervenience’, in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), accessible at <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/supervenience/>..>Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R. and Winter, Sidney G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Penrose, Edith (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Richardson, George B. (1972), ‘The Organization of Industry’, Economic Journal, 82: 883–896.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1995), The Construction of Social Reality, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (2005), ‘What is an Institution?’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 1: 1–22.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. (1979), ‘Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations’, Journal of Law and Economics, 22: 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Witt, Ulrich (1999), ‘Do Entrepreneurs Need Firms? A Contribution to a Missing Chapter in Austrian Economics’, Review of Austrian Economics, 11: 99–109.Google Scholar
Yu, Tony F. (1999), ‘Toward a Praxeological Theory of the Firm’, Review of Austrian Economics, 12: 25–41.Google Scholar