Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-nww4m Total loading time: 1.071 Render date: 2022-06-25T18:11:53.469Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Burning the Rechtsstaat: legal institutions and protection of the rule of law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2020

Christopher A. Hartwell*
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland
Mateusz Urban
Affiliation:
Oxford Economics, Oxford, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: chartwell@kozminski.edu.pl

Abstract

The economic literature is clear that transparent and impartial rule of law is crucial for successful economic outcomes. However, how does one guarantee rule of law? This paper uses the idea of ‘self-reinforcing’ institutions to show how political institutions may derail rule of law if associated judicial institutions are not self-reinforcing. We illustrate this using the contrasting examples of Estonia and Poland to frame the importance of institutional context in determining both rule of law and the path of legal institutions. Although starting tabula rasa for a legal system is difficult, it worked well for rule of law in Estonia in the post-communist transition. Alternately, Poland pursued a much more gradualist strategy of reform of formal legal institutions; this approach meant that justice institutions, slow to shed their legacy and connection with the past, were relatively weak and susceptible to attack from more powerful (political) ones. We conclude that legal institutions can protect the rule of law but only if they are in line with political institutions, using their self-reinforcing nature as a shield from political whims of the day.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, N. A. and Fish, M. S. (2015), ‘Policies First, Institutions Second: Lessons from Estonia's Economic Reforms’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 31(6): 491513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. A. (2005), ‘Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth’, Handbook of Economic Growth, 1(1): 385472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J., Bernstein, D. and Gray, C. (2005), Judicial Systems in Transition Economies: Assessing the Past, Looking to the Future, Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, J. T. and Montinola, G. R. (2004), ‘Veto Players and the Rule of Law in Emerging Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 37(1): 5587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annus, T. and Tavits, M. (2004), ‘Judicial Behavior after a Change of Regime: The Effects of Judge and Defendant Characteristics’, Law & Society Review, 38(4): 711736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoszewski, A. (2005), ‘Władza sądownicza w procesie demokratyzacji: analiza przypadku polskiego’, Studia Politicae Universitatis Silensiensis, 1: 89104.Google Scholar
Auers, D. (2015), Comparative Politics and Government of the Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in the 21st Century, Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balcerowicz, L. (1995), Socialism, Capitalism, Transformation, Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Basabe-Serrano, S. (2012), ‘Presidential Power and the Judicialization of Politics as Determinants of Institutional Change in the Judiciary: The Supreme Court of Ecuador (1979–2009)’, Politics and Policy, 40(2): 339361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, T. A. (2012), ‘Elite Consensus and Political Polarization: Cases from Central Europe’, Historical Social Research, 37(1): 90106.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. (1994), ‘“Dethroning Politics”: Liberalism, Constitutionalism and Democracy in the Thought of FA Hayek’, British Journal of Political Science, 24(4): 419441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, B. L. (1989), ‘Enforcement of Private Property Rights in Primitive Societies: Law Without Government’, Journal of Libertarian Studies, 9(1): 126.Google Scholar
Bjørnskov, C. (2008), ‘Social Trust and Fractionalization: A Possible Reinterpretation’, European Sociological Review, 24(3): 271283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodnar, A. (2009), ‘The Judiciary in Poland After 20 Years of Transformation’, in Kucharczyk, J. and Zbieranek, J. (eds.), Democracy in Poland 1989–2009: Challenges for the Future, Warsaw: Institute of Public Affairs, pp. 3150.Google Scholar
Brousseau, E., Garrouste, P. and Raynaud, E. (2011), ‘Institutional Changes: Alternative Theories and Consequences for Institutional Design’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 79(1–2): 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brzezinski, M. (1993), ‘The Emergence of Judicial Review in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland’, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 41(2): 153200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brzezinski, M. F. and Garlicki, L. (1995), ‘Judicial Review in Post-Communist Poland: The Emergence of a Rechtsstaat’, Stanford Journal of International Law, 31(1): 1361.Google Scholar
Bucholc, M. (2019), ‘Commemorative Lawmaking: Memory Frames of the Democratic Backsliding in Poland After 2015’, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11(1): 85110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0080-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugarič, B. and Ginsburg, T. (2016), ‘The Assault on Postcommunist Courts’, Journal of Democracy, 27(3): 6982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, J. and Schrag, P. (1994), ‘Law Reform in Estonia: The Role of Georgetown University Law Center’, Law & Policy in International Business, 449(25): 449460.Google Scholar
Carothers, T. (1998), ‘The Rule of Law Revival’, Foreign Affairs, 77(2): 95106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, R., Clementi, G. L. and MacDonald, G. (2009), ‘Legal Institutions, Sectoral Heterogeneity, and Economic Development’, The Review of Economic Studies, 76(2): 529561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CBOS (2016), ‘Ocena Instytucji Publicznych 1990–2016’, http://www.cbos.pl/PL/publikacje/diagnozy.php (accessed December 3, 2017)Google Scholar
Cole, D. H. (1998), ‘Poland's 1997 Constitution in its Historical Context’, Saint Louis-Warsaw Transatlantic Law Journal, 1: 144.Google Scholar
Constitution of Estonia (1992), https://www.president.ee/en/republic-of-estonia/the-constitution/ (accessed December 9, 2017)Google Scholar
David, P. A. (1994), ‘Why are Institutions the ‘Carriers of History’? Path Dependence and the Evolution of Conventions, Organizations and Institutions’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5(2): 205220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, R. (2003), ‘Lustration Laws in Action: The Motives and Evaluation of Lustration Policy in the Czech Republic and Poland (1989–2001)’, Law & Social Inquiry, 28(2): 387439.Google Scholar
Deakin, S., Gindis, D., Hodgson, G. M., Huang, K. and Pistor, K. (2017), ‘Legal Institutionalism: Capitalism and the Constitutive Role of Law’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(1): 188200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, K., Sage, C. and Stefanova, M. (2005), Law or Justice: Building Equitable Legal Institutions, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google ScholarPubMed
Deffains, B. and Fluet, C. (2020), ‘Social Norms and Legal Design’, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 36(1): 139169, https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewz016.Google Scholar
Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (2003), ‘The New Comparative Economics’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(4): 595619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G., Marengo, L. and Nuvolari, A. (2020), ‘Institutions and Economic Change: Some Notes on Self-Organization, Power and Learning in Human Organizations’, Eurasian Business Review, 10(1): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit (2019), ‘Democracy Index 2018: Me too? Political participation, protest and democracy’, http://www.eiu.com/Handlers/WhitepaperHandler.ashx?fi=Democracy_Index_2018.pdf&mode=wp&campaignid=Democracy2018.Google Scholar
Ellickson, R. C. (1998), ‘Law and Economics Discovers Social Norms’, The Journal of Legal Studies, 27(S2): 537552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser Institute (2017), ‘Economic Freedom of the World’, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/economic-freedom-of-the-world-2017.pdf (accessed December 9, 2017).Google Scholar
Gallagher, M. (2003), ‘Judicial and Legislative Process and Estonian Accession’, Baltic Journal of Economics, 3(2): 7480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garretsen, H., Lensink, R. and Sterken, E. (2004), ‘Growth, Financial Development, Societal Norms and Legal Institutions’, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 14(2): 165183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherasimov, C. (2015), Estonia and Poland: Setting Up Regional Examples in Anti-Corruption Performance Through Independent Judiciaries. Presentation at ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Warsaw, March 29-April 2.Google Scholar
Gillies, J., Leimann, J. and Peterson, R. (2002), ‘Making a Successful Transition from a Command to a Market Economy: The Lessons from Estonia’, Corporate Governance, 10(3): 175186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant Thornton (2017), ‘Barometr Prawa’, http://barometrprawa.pl (accessed December 9, 2017).Google Scholar
Gray, C. W. (1997), ‘Reforming Legal Systems in Developing and Transition Countries’, Finance and Development, 34(3): 1416.Google Scholar
Greif, A. (1989), ‘Reputation and Coalitions in Medieval Trade: Evidence on the Maghribi Traders’, Journal of Economic History, 49(4): 857882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A. (1994), ‘On the Political Foundations of the Late Medieval Commercial Revolution: Genoa During the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries’, Journal of Economic History, 54(02): 271287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A. (1998), ‘Historical and Comparative Institutional Analysis’, The American Economic Review, 88(2): 8084.Google Scholar
Greif, A. (2006), Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A. and Laitin, D. D. (2004), ‘A Theory of Endogenous Institutional change’, American Political Science Review, 98(4): 633652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hałas, E. (2005), ‘Constructing the Identity of a Nation-State. Symbolic Conflict Over the Preamble to the Constitution of the Third Republic of Poland’, Polish Sociological Review, 149(1): 4967.Google Scholar
Hartwell, C. (2013), Institutional Barriers in the Transition to Market: Examining Performance and Divergence in Transition Economies, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartwell, C. (2016), Two Roads Diverge: The Transition Experience of Poland and Ukraine, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartwell, C. (2018), ‘The “Hierarchy of Institutions” Reconsidered: Monetary Policy and its Effect on the Rule of Law in Interwar Poland’, Explorations in Economic History, 68: 3770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havrylyshyn, O. (2006), Divergent Paths in Post-Communist Transformation: Capitalism for All or Capitalism for the Few?, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1944), The Road to Serfdom, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1973), Rules and Order (Volume 1 of Law, Legislation and Liberty), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayo, B. and Voigt, S. (2008), ‘Inflation, Central Bank Independence, and the Legal System’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, JITE, 164(4): 751777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage Foundation (2020), ‘Index of Economic Freedom’, http://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2020/book/index_2020.pdf (accessed April 27, 2020).Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2017), ‘Reforming the Judiciary: Learning from the Experience of Central, Eastern, and Southeastern Europe in: Regional Economic Outlook: Europe Hitting Its Stride’, https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/REO/EU/Issues/2017/11/06/Eurreo1117m.Google Scholar
Jasiewicz, K. (2000), ‘Dead Ends and New Beginnings: The Quest for A Procedural Republic in Poland’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 33(1): 101122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, E. G. (2003), ‘The Rule of Law and Judicial Reform: The Political Economy of Diverse Institutional Patterns and Reformers’ Responses’, in Jensen, E. G. and Heller, T. C. (eds.), Beyond Common Knowledge: Empirical Approaches to the Rule of Law, Palo Alton: Stanford University Press, pp. 336382.Google Scholar
Keefer, P. and Knack, S. (2002), ‘Polarization, Politics and Property Rights: Links Between Inequality and Growth’, Public Choice, 111(1–2): 127154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, R. D. (2017), ‘The Assault on Poland's Judiciary’, Foreign Affairs, July 26, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/poland/2017-07-26/assault-polands-judiciary.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. D. and Orenstein, M. A. (2016), ‘Europe's Autocracy Problem’, Foreign Affairs, January 7, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/poland/2016-01-07/europes-autocracy-problem.Google Scholar
Khan, I. (2017), ‘How Can the Rule of Law Advance Sustainable Development in a Troubled and Turbulent World’, McGill Journal of Sustainable Development Law, 13(2): 211223.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (1992), ‘The Formation of Party Systems in East Central Europe’, Politics & Society, 20(1): 750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolosky, D. (2014), ‘Toward an Interpretive Model of Judicial Independence: A Case Study of Eastern Europe’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 31(1): 203255.Google Scholar
Krygier, M. (2015), ‘Rule of Law (and Rechtsstaat)’, in Wright, J. D. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Vol 20), Oxford: Elsevier, 2nd edition, pp. 780787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laar, M. (2002), Estonia: Little Country that Could, London: Centre for Research into Post-Communist Economies.Google Scholar
Laar, M. (2007), The Estonian Economic Miracle. Backgrounder: Heritage Foundation. http://www.heritage.org/report/the-estonian-economic-miracle.Google Scholar
Laar, M. (2014), ‘Estonia: The Most Radical Reforms’, in Åslund, A. and Djankov, S. (eds.), The Great Rebirth: Lessons from the Victory of Capitalism over Communism, Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics, pp. 1738.Google Scholar
Lanzara, G. F. (1998), ‘Self-destructive Processes in Institution Building and some Modest Countervailing Mechanisms’, European Journal of Political Research, 33(1): 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B., Lee, K. M. and Yang, J. S. (2018), ‘Network Structure Reveals Patterns of Legal Complexity in Human Society: The Case of the Constitutional Legal Network’, Working Paper, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3202925 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3202925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, P. T. (2007), ‘Efficient anarchy’, Public Choice, 130(1–2): 4153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, H. (2012), ‘The Polish Growth Miracle: Outcome of Persistent Reform Efforts’, IZA Policy Paper (40). Institute for the Study of Labor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C. and Schwartz, S. H. (2007), ‘Culture Rules: The Foundations of the Rule of Law and Other Norms of Governance’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(4): 659688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, C. (1977), Politics and Markets, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (1967), ‘Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction’, in Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments, New York: Free Press, pp. 164.Google Scholar
Magalhaes, G. (1999), ‘The Politics of Judicial Reform in Eastern Europe’, Comparative Politics, 32(1): 4362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mańko, R. (2013), ‘Survival of the Socialist Legal Tradition? A Polish Perspective’, Comparative Law Review, 4(2): 128, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2332219.Google Scholar
Markowski, R. (1997), ‘Political Parties and Ideological Spaces in East Central Europe’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 30(3): 221254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowski, R. (2008), ‘The 2007 Polish Parliamentary Election: Some Structuring, Still a Lot of Chaos’, West European Politics, 31(5): 10551068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowski, R. (2019), ‘Creating Authoritarian Clientelism: Poland After 2015’, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11(1): 111132, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0082-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinsen, D. S. (2015), ‘Judicial Influence on Policy Outputs? The Political Constraints of Legal Integration in the European Union’, Comparative Political Studies, 48(12): 16221660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matczak, M., Bencze, M. and Kuhn, Z. (2010), ‘Constitutions, EU Law and Judicial Strategies in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland’, Journal of Public Policy, 30(1): 8199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merusk, K. (2004), ‘Administrative Law Reform in Estonia: Legal Policy Choices and Their Implementation’, Juridica International, 9(1): 5262.Google Scholar
Norkus, Z. (2007), ‘Why Did Estonia Perform Best? The North-South Gap in the Post-Socialist Economic Transition of the Baltic States’, Journal of Baltic Studies, 38(1): 2142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, K. (2015), The History of the Baltic States, Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Books.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G. A. (1996), ‘Illusions About consolidation’, Journal of Democracy, 7(2): 3451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, G. A. (2004), ‘The Quality of Democracy: Why the Rule of Law Matters’, Journal of Democracy, 15(4): 3246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiatynski, W. (1995), ‘A Letter from Poland’, East European Constitutional Review, 4(1): 3543.Google Scholar
Owen, T. C. (1985), ‘The Russian Industrial Society and Tsarist Economic Policy, 1867–1905’, The Journal of Economic History, 45(3): 587606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padam, S. (2007), ‘Transformation from a Centrally Planned to a Market Economy: Developments in Estonia, 1989–2003’, in Kiglics, I. (ed.), Rebuilding the Market Economy in Central-East Europe and the Baltic Countries, Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, pp. 255318.Google Scholar
Pagano, U. (2000), ‘Legal Positions and Institutional Complementarities’, in Cafaggi, F., Nicita, A., and Pagano, U. (eds.), Legal Orderings and Economic Institutions, New York: Routledge, pp. 6695.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009), ‘A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Adaptive Capacity and Multi-Level Learning Processes in Resource Governance Regimes’, Global environmental change, 19(3): 354365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paquette, G. B. (2007), ‘State-civil Society Cooperation and Conflict in the Spanish Empire: The Intellectual and Political Activities of the Ultramarine Consulados and Economic Societies, c. 1780–1810’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 39(2): 263298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parna, P. (2005), ‘Legal Reform in Estonia’, International Journal of Legal Information, 33(2): 219223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prado, M. and Trebilcock, M. (2009), ‘Path Dependence, Development, and the Dynamics of Institutional Reform’, University of Toronto Law Journal, 59(3): 341380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purs, A. (2012), Baltic Facades: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania Since 1945, London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Raun, T. (2010), Estonia and the Estonians, Palo Alto, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Roland, G. (2004), ‘Understanding Institutional Change: Fast-Moving and Slow-Moving Institutions’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4): 109131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosser, J. B. Jr (1999), ‘On the Complexities of Complex Economic Dynamics’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(4): 169192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruhl, J. B., Katz, D. M. and Bommarito, M. J. (2017), ‘Harnessing Legal Complexity’, Science, 355(6332): 13771378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rytel-Warzocha, A. (2017), ‘The Dispute over the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland and its Impact on the Protection of Constitutional Rights and Freedoms’, International Comparative Jurisprudence, 3(2): 153160.Google Scholar
Sabados, M. D. (1998), The Influence of the Judiciary Upon the Development of the Rule of Law in Post-Communist Poland (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).Google Scholar
Sabbat-Świdlicka, A. (1992), ‘Poland’, RFE/RL Research Report, 1(27): 2533.Google Scholar
Sadurski, W. (2019), ‘Polish Constitutional Tribunal Under PiS: From an Activist Court, to a Paralysed Tribunal, to a Governmental Enabler’, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11(1): 6384, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0078-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadurski, W. and Steinbeis, M. (2016), ‘What is Going on in Poland is an Attack against Democracy’, https://verfassungsblog.de/what-is-going-on-in-poland-is-an-attack-against-democracy/ (accessed April 23, 2020).Google Scholar
Sannerholm, R. (2007), ‘Legal, Judicial and Administrative Reforms in Post-Conflict Societies: Beyond the Rule of Law Template’, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 12(1): 6594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarapuu, K. (2012), ‘Administrative Structure in Times of Changes: The Development of Estonian Ministries and Government Agencies 1990–2010’, International Journal of Public Administration, 35(12): 808819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalia, A. (1989), ‘The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules’, University of Chicago Law Review, 56(4): 11751188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosnowska, A. (1997), ‘Tu, Tam-Pomieszanie’, Studia Socjologiczne, (4): 6186.Google Scholar
Stromseth, J. (2008), ‘Post-Conflict Rule of Law Building: The Need for a Multi-Layered, Synergistic Approach’, William and Mary Law Review, 49(4): 14431472.Google Scholar
Taylor, N. (2018), Estonia: A Modern History, London: Hurst & Company.Google Scholar
Tõnnisson, K. and Randma-Liiv, T. (2008), ‘Public Management Reforms: Estonia’, in Bouckaert, G., Nemec, J., Nakrošis, V., Hajnal, G., and Tõnnisson, K. (eds), Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe, Bratislava: NISPAcee Press, pp. 93120.Google Scholar
Touchton, M. (2013), ‘Dangers of Diversity: Ethnic Fractionalization and the Rule of Law’, Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 8(1): 2040.Google Scholar
Tsai, K. S. (2006), ‘Adaptive Informal Institutions and Endogenous Institutional Change in China’, World Politics, 59(1): 116141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tworzecki, H. (1996), Parties and Politics in Post-1989 Poland, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Tworzecki, H. (2018), ‘Poland: A Case of Top-Down Polarization’, Annals, American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1): 97119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uitz, R. (2007), ‘Constitutional Courts in Central and Eastern Europe’, Juridica International, 13: 4759.Google Scholar
van Veen, E. (2017), ‘A Shotgun Marriage: Political contestation and the rule of law in fragile societies’, Clingendael Report, June, https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/a_shotgun_marriage.pdf.Google Scholar
Varga, C. (2014), ‘The Changing Judicial Patterns in Central Europe: Pre and Post-Accession’, Acta Juridica Hungarica, 55(2): 87106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walicki, A. (1997), ‘Transitional Justice and the Political Struggles of Post-Communist Poland’, in McAdams, J. (ed.), Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 185238.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978), Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wiatr, J. (2018), ‘Democratic Experience in Central Europe: 25 Years Later’, Journal of Comparative Politics, 11(1): 511.Google Scholar
Williamson, C. R. and Kerekes, C. B. (2011), ‘Securing Private Property: Formal Versus Informal Institutions’, The Journal of Law and Economics, 54(3): 537572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Justice Project (2018), ‘WJP Rule of Law Index’, https://worldjusticeproject.org/our-work/wjp-rule-law-index/wjp-rule-law-index-2017–2018 (accessed January 25, 2019)Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2010), ‘Institutional Dynamics: Resilience, Vulnerability and Adaptation in Environmental and Resource Regimes’, Global Environmental Change, 20(3): 378385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarycki, T. (2000), ‘Politics in the Periphery: Political Cleavages in Poland Interpreted in Their Historical and International Context’, Europe-Asia Studies, 52(5): 851873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Burning the Rechtsstaat: legal institutions and protection of the rule of law
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Burning the Rechtsstaat: legal institutions and protection of the rule of law
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Burning the Rechtsstaat: legal institutions and protection of the rule of law
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *