Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T14:55:40.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Topographical Distribution of Ostertagia spp. in the Abomasum of Sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

J. D. Dunsmore
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Sydney, Sydney

Extract

A topographical distribution of Ostertagia spp. lesions in the abomasum of sheep has been observed under certain field conditions which is the reverse of that described by Sommerville (1953, 1954) and also seen by this author to be characteristic of a primary Ostertagia spp. infection.

This “reverse distribution” has been demonstrated experimentally under conditions in which a heavy primary Ostertagia infection has been acquired (in the field or artificially) and naturally eliminated; the “reverse distribution” is then characteristically acquired by a challenge infection.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chandler, A. C., 1953.—“Immunity in parasitic diseases.” J. Egypt. med. Ass., 36, 811834.Google ScholarPubMed
Cox, H. W., 1952.—“The effect of concurrent infection with the dog hookworm Ancylostoma caninum on the natural and acquired resistance of mice to Trichinella spiralis”. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc., 68, 222235.Google Scholar
Dunsmore, J. D., 1902.—“Anthelmintic activity of thiabendazole against mature and immature Ostertagia spp. in sheep.” Aust. vet. J., 38, 412413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunsmore, J. D., 1965.—“Ostertagia spp. in lambs and pregnant ewes.” J. Helminth., 39, 159184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goulson, H. T., 1958.—“Studies on the influence of a prior infection with Ancylostoma caninum on the establishment and maintenance of Trichinella spiralis in mice.” J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc., 74, 1423.Google Scholar
Larsh, J. E. and Hendricks, J. R., 1949.—“The probable explanation for the differences in the localisation of adult Trichinella spiralis in young and old mice.” J. ParasiL., 35, 101106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsh, J. E. and Race, G. J., 1954.—“A histopathologic study of the anterior small intestine of immunized and non-immunized mice infected with Trichinella spiralis.” J. infect. Dis., 94, 262272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louch, C. D., 1962.—“Increased resistance to Trichinella spiralis in the laboratory rat following infection with Nippostrongylus muris.” J. Parasit., 48, 2426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommerville, R. I., 1953.—“Development of Ostertagia circumcincta in the abomasal mucosa of the sheep.” Nature, Lond., 171, 482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommerville, R. I., 1954.—“The histotropic phase of the nematode parasite Ostertagia circumcincta.” Aust. J. agric. Res., 5, 130140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerville, R. I., 1956.—“The histology of the ovine abomasum, and the relation of the globule leucocyte to nematode infestations.” Aust. vet. J., 32, 237240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar