A brief description has been given in an earlier paper (Goodey, 1943) of damage to tulip bulbs caused by the stem and bulb eelworm, Anguillulina dipsaci. In April, 1944, an opportunity arose, through the good offices of Mr. J. Oldnall Page, of Spalding, Lincs., of visiting a field in his district, in which eelworm-affected tulips were growing. Two of the varieties inspected were in flower and the other two were in an advanced bud condition. All four varieties exhibited marked symptoms of attack, and in the case of two of them in which there were a considerable number of plants, the damage caused to the blooms would entail a distinct financial loss to the grower. The largest planting consisted of the variety “ Rijnland,” the next largest was the variety “Wonderful.” In addition to these there were smaller plantings of “ William Copland ” and “ Mrs. Farncombe Sanders.” In all four varieties evidences of attack were apparent on leaves, stems and flowers and, in general, the writer can confirm the findings of Chitwood and Machmer (1942) on the symptoms manifested by the growing plant. They mention longitudinal splitting of leaf, flower-stem and corolla. It may be well, however, to attempt a more detailed description of the chief symptoms and types of lesion shown by affected plants: see also the two photographs accompanying this paper.