Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T00:54:48.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Paramphistomum phillerouxi sp. nov. (Trematoda: Paramphistomatidae) and its Development in Bulinus forskalii

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

J. A. Dinnik
Affiliation:
East African Veterinary Research Organization, Muguga, Kenya

Extract

(1)Paramphistomum phillerouxi sp.nov. from rumina of cattle in Northern Rhodesia is described and its morphology compared with that of Paramphistomum microbothrium Fischoeder from Egypt, Kenya, Northern Rhodesia, and South Africa.

(2)Bulinus forskalii (Ehrenberg) is a natural intermediate host of P. phillerouxi in Northern Rhodesia and Tanganyika. Of other snails, Bulinus senegalensis (Muller) from Gambia was successfully infected experimentally, and Bulinus cernicus (Morelet) in Mauritius was found naturally infected with P. phillerouxi.

(3) The development of P. phillerouxi in Bitlinus forskalii is described. The sporocyst gives birth to 18 to 28 rediae. These firstgeneration rediae are able to produce daughter rediae as well as cercariae. It seemed that not all of the first-generation rediae started to produce daughter rediae first. Some of the rediae began by producing cercariae and produced a few daughter rediae later alongside numerous cercariae. There is some evidence that the subsequent generations of rediae are also capable of developing daughter rediae and cercariae simultaneously.

(4) The first young cercariae to leave the parent rediae were observed 21 days after exposure of the snails to a single miracidium each, and the first shedding of mature cercariae was noted 42 days after the exposure, the snails being kept at 20°C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dinnik, J. A. and Dinnik, N. N., 1954.—“The life cycle of Paramphistomum microbolhrium Fischoeder, 1001 (Trematoda: Paramphistomidae)Parasitology, 44, 285–99. (W.L. 16035).Google Scholar
Dinnik, J. A., 1954.—“Paramphistomum sukari n.sp. from Kenya cattle and its intermediate hostParasitology, 44, 414–21.Google Scholar
Dinnik, J. A. and Dinnik, N. N., 1957.—“Development of Paramphistomum sukari Dinnik, 1954 (Trematoda: Paramphistomidae) in a snail hostParasitology, 47, 209–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischoeder, F., 1901.—“Die Paramphistomiden der SaugetiereZool. Am., 24, 367–75. (W.L. 23833).Google Scholar
Fischoeder, F., 1903.—“Die Paramphistomiden der SaugetiereZool. Iber. (Syst.), 17, 485660. (W.L. 23835).Google Scholar
Leroux, P. L., 1930.—“A preliminary communication on the life cycle of otylophoron cotylophorum and its pathogenicity for sheep and cattleRep. vet. Res. S. Afr., 16, 243–53. (W.L. 18640).Google Scholar
Leroux, P. L., 1957.—“Report to the Government of the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland on the control of parasitic diseases in livestockF.A.O. Report, N.696, 147.Google Scholar
Nassurk, K. E., 1937.—“A revision of the trematode family ParamphistomidaeZool. Didr. Uppsala, 16, 301565. (W.L. 23836).Google Scholar
Price, E. W. and Mcintosh, A., 1944.—“Paramphistomcs of North American domestic ruminantsJ. Parasit., 30, Suppl.9. (W.L. 11428).Google Scholar