Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T22:18:07.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nematode parasite control practices of sheep and goat farmers in the region of Trikala, Greece

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

G. Theodoropoulos*
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Physiology of Farm Animals
H. Theodoropoulos
Affiliation:
Department of Studies and Research, National Labour Institute of Greece, 6–8 K.Palama Str., 11141 Athens, Greece
G. Zervas
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, Votanikos, Athens 11855, Greece
E. Bartziokas
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Physiology of Farm Animals
*
*Fax: +30 1 5294388 E-mail: gtheo@auadec.aua.gr

Abstract

Information concerning worm control practices of sheep and goat farmers in the region of Trikala (central Greece) was collected through a questionnaire survey by visiting farms and interviewing farmers. Questionnaires from 57 farmers residing in 23 rural communities were collected. Anthelmintics were used by 89% of the farmers. On average, lambs, kids and goats were treated once annually, while sheep were treated either once or twice annually. Only 2% of farmers reported treatment of animals with anthelmintics when moving to new pastures. The most common broad-spectrum anthelmintics used were those belonging to the benzimidazoles and probenzimidazoles. Fifty nine percent of the farmers used the same anthelmintic group for 3 or more years and 34% used two or more anthelmintic groups in the same year. Almost all farmers reported estimating live weights for calculating anthelmintic doses through visual perception on the basis of an average weight (96%). Tablets and boluses were the most preferred anthelmintic formulation used by 96% of farmers. The selection of an anthelmintic was based for 58% of farmers on recommendation by a veterinarian and for 39% of farmers on the cost of the drug. The most common occasions for deworming the animals were at turn out (86%) and after parturition (31%). Only 6% of farmers reported deworming new animals before introducing them onto the farm. Farmers preferred to seek information about the use of anthelmintics and worm control strategies from veterinarians (63%) and other farmers (37%).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coles, C.G. & Roush, R.T. (1992) Slowing the spread of anthelmintic resistant nematodes of sheep and goats in the UK. Veterinary Record 130, 505510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, G.C. (1996) Anthelmintic resistance of worms in sheep and goats, practical help on avoidance. Leaflet produced at the University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Coles, G.C. (1997) Nematode control practices and anthelmintic resistance on British sheep farms. Veterinary Record 141, 9193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donald, A.D. (1983) Anthelmintic resistance in relation to helminth control and grazing systems. pp. 187198 in Borgsteede, F.H.M., Henrisken, S.A. & Over, H.J. (Eds ) Facts and reflections. IV. Resistance of parasites to anthelmintics. Central Veterinary Institute, Lelysted.Google Scholar
Edwards, J.R., Wroth, L., de, Chaneet, G.C., Brasie, R.B., Karlson, J., Mercombes, P.W., Parton Morgan, G. & Roberts, D. (1986) Survey for anthelmintic resistance in Australian sheep flocks. 2. Relationship with sheep management and parasite control practices. Australian Veterinary Journal 63, 139143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillham, R.J. & Obendorf, D.L. (1985) Therapeutic failure of levamisole in dairy goats. Australian Veterinary Journal 62, 426427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Himonas, C. (1976) The ‘blind treatment’ with combined anthelmintics in the control of internal parasitism. Greek Veterinary Medicine 19, 149157.Google Scholar
Himonas, C. & Papadopoulos, E. (1994) Anthelmintic resistance in imported sheep. Veterinary Record 134, 456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kettle, P.R., Vlassoff, A., Reid, T.C. & Horton, C.J. (1983) A survey of nematode control measures used by milking goat farmers and anthelmintic resistance on their farms. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 31, 139143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maingi, N., Bjorn, H., Thamsborg, S.M., Dangolla, A. & Kyvsgaard, N.C. (1996a) Worm control practices on sheep farms in Denmark and implications for the development of anthelmintic resistance. Veterinary Parasitology 66, 3952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maingi, N., Bjorn, H., Thamsborg, S.M., Dangolla, A. & Kyvsgaard, N.C. (1996) A questionnaire survey of nematode parasite control practices on goat farms in Denmark. Veterinary Parasitology 66, 2537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NSSG (National Statistical Service of Greece) (1995) Data supplied by the Trikala Regional Office of the Ministry of Agriculture..Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, E., Himonas, C. & Coles, G.C. (1996) Anthelmintic resistance of sheep and goat gastrointestinal nematodes. 7th Hellenic Veterinary Congress Abstracts,Thessaloniki,Greece, p. 149.Google Scholar
Waller, P.J. (1987) Anthelmintic resistance and the future for roundworm control. Veterinary Parasitology 25, 177191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed