Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T07:32:07.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Metabolism of Trichinosed Rats during the Intermediate Phases of the Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

W. P. Rogers
W. P. Rogers
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, St. Albans.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The action of Trichinella spiralis infections in markedly lowering protein digestion in rats is confined to a period 4 to 12 days afier infection. Minor disturbances in protein digestion occurring about 30 days after infection may have been due to adult females leaving the host.

Over the first 12 days of infection the protein digestion was lowered (calculated as the summation of the percentage fall for each of the first 3 periods) approximately 1% for each 100 infective larvae fed. The degree of digestive disorder seemed unrelated to the number of larvae finally recovered from the hosts' tissues.

Inorganic P excretion fell to a very low level 4 to 8 days after infection. Twenty-four days later the rate of excretion rose, the maximum being 2 or 3 times the normal level.

Ca assimilation fell to a very low point during the second period of infection, falling again after a further 9 periods.

As indicated by weight losses the most marked period of the disease occurred from the 8th to the 11th period after infection.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 20 , Issue 3-4 , December 1942 , pp. 139 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beahm, E. H. & Downs, C. M., 1939.—“Differential blood pictures and total cell counts on nornlal and Trichinella infected albino rats.” J. Parasit., xxv (5). 404–411. (W.L.. 11428.)Google Scholar
Beeson, P. B., 1941. “Trichiniasis. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis.” Lancet, ccxli, 67–69. (W.L.. 11995.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, T. W. M., 1934.—“The Internal Parasites of Domestic Animals” A. & C. Black: London.Google Scholar
Carter, L. F., 1930.—“Trichinosis and its ocular manifestations.” J. Amer. med. Assn., xcv (19), 1420–1423. (W.L.. 11005.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culbertson, J. T., 1942.—“Passive transfer of immunity to Trichinella spiralis in the rat.” J. Parasit., xxviii (3), 203–206. (W.L.. 11428.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culbertson, J. T., 1942.—“Active immunity in mice against Trichinella spiralis.” J. Parasit., xxviii (3), 196–202. (W.L.. 11428.)Google Scholar
Emden, G., 1921.—“Eine gravimetrische Bestimrningsmethodo für kleine Phosphorsauremengen.” Hoppe-Seyl. Z., cxiii. 138. (W.L.. 9650.)Google Scholar
Faust, E. C., 1939.—“Hunian Helminthology.” K. Kirripton: London.Google Scholar
Havard, R. E. & Reay, G. A., 1926.—“Note on the excretion of phosphate during water diuresis.” Bio-chem. J. xx. 99–101. (W.L.. 2967.)Google Scholar
Hart, P. & Verney, E. B., 1934.—“Observations on the rate of water loss by man at rest.” Clin. Sci., i, 367–696. (W.L.. 6422a.)Google Scholar
Lehmensick, R. & Senadesaya, P., 1941.—“Beitrage zur Epidemiologie der Trichinose.” Z. Parasilenk., xii (3), 340–361. (W.L.. 23536a.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, F. H., 1910.—“The quantitative separation of calcium and magnesium in the presence of phosphates and small amounts of iron devised especially for the analysis of foods, urine and faeces.” J. biol. Chem., vii, 83. (W.L.. 11063.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, F. H., 1911.—“The determination of calcium in the presence of magnesium phosphate; the determination of calcium in urine.” J. biol. Chem., x, 187. (W.L.. 11063.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, W. P., 1941.—“The metabolism of trichinosed rats.” J. Helminth., xix (3/4), 87–104. (W.L.. 11224b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shearer, G. O. & Stewart, J., 1932.—“The effects of nematode infestations on the metabolism of the host. Part III. Effects on mineral metabolism.” Rep. Inst. Anim. Path. Univ. Camb., iii, 87–94. (W.L.. 18252b).Google Scholar