Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-17T20:28:38.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identification of Heterodera Species by Larval Length. Technique for Estimating the Constants determining the Length Variations Within a given Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

D. W. Fenwick  and
M. T. Franklin
D. W. Fenwick
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, St. Albans.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A complete investigation of the variations likely to occur in the lengths of larvae of Heterodera rostochiensis (for example) under all conditions would involve measuring larvae from a great number of varieties of potato grown in a great number of different localities, and also of larvae from tomatoes of different varieties grown under various conditions. The results obtained so far for this species of Heterodera make but a small contribution towards the mass of information which might be accumulated. Until such further data become available, certain conclusions have been drawn as to the best method of taking samples of larvae for measurement, but it must be remembered that these conclusions may need revision at a later date in the light of new information. According to our present knowledge it appears that the variety of potato on which a cyst has developed does not significantly affect the mean length of the larvae within, but that the mean length of the larvae from a single plant, irrespective of the variety, may differ significantly from that of larvae from another plant. It is also deduced that the variations in the mean lengths of the larvae from different cysts are greater than the variations within the individual cysts. From these facts it follows that if one wishes to estimate parameters for larval lengths of a population of H. rostochiensis larvae, a better estimate will be obtained if one takes a small number of larvae from each of a large number of cysts rather than the same total number of larvae from a small number of cysts. Similarly the cysts should have come from a large rather than a small number of plants, but apparently it is not necessary that the plants should be of as many varieties as possible, though this last assumption is based on information derived from only seven varieties of potato, all of them maincrop varieties, and it may need modification when larvae from other varieties have been examined.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 20 , Issue 3-4 , December 1942 , pp. 67 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fenwick, D. W., 1942.—“The degree of Heterodera infectivity of soil and its determination.” J. Helminth., xx (1/2), p. 50–66. (W.L. 11224 b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, M. T., 1940.—“On the specific status of the so-called biological strains of Heterodera schachtii Schmidt.” J. Helminth., xviii (4), p. 193–208. (W.L. 11224 b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffart, H., 1930.—“Rassenstudien an Heterodera schachtii Schm.” Arb. Biol. Reichsanst. f. Land-u. Forstwirts., xviii (1), p. 83–100.Google Scholar
Goffart, H., 1934.—“Die Bestimmung von Rüben-, Hafer- und Kartoffelnematoden auf Grund von Bodenuntersuchungen.” Z. PflKrankh., 44 (1), 36–41. (W.L. 23540 b.)Google Scholar
Liebscher, G., 1892.—“Beobachtungen über das Auftreten eines Nematoden an Erbsen.” J. Landw., 40, p. 357–368. (W.L. 11288.)Google Scholar
Schmidt, O., 1930.—“Sind Rüben- und Hafernematoden identisch?” Arch. PflBau, iii, 420–464. (W.L.. 1789 b.)Google Scholar
Triffitt, M. J., 1928.—“On the morphology of Heterodera schachtii with special reference to the potato-strain.” J. Helminth., vi (1) 39–50. (W.L.. 11224 b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triffitt, M. J., 1929.—“Further observations on the morphology of Heterodera schachtii, with remarks on the bionomics of a strain attacking mangolds in Britain.” J. Helminth., vii (3) 119–140. (W.L.. 11224 b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar