Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T04:25:55.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

First rDNA sequence data for Haplosplanchnus pachysomus (Digenea: Haplosplanchnidae) ex Mugil cephalus from the Black Sea, and molecular evidence for cryptic species within Haplosplanchnus pachysomus (Digenea: Haplosplanchnidae) in Palaearctic and Indo-West Pacific regions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2021

D.M. Atopkin*
Affiliation:
Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the RAS, Vladivostok, Russia Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia
N.V. Pronkina
Affiliation:
Moscow Rrepresentative Office of А.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Yu.V. Belousova
Affiliation:
Moscow Rrepresentative Office of А.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
M.P. Plaksina
Affiliation:
Murmansk Marine Biological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Murmansk, Russia
E.A. Vodiasova
Affiliation:
Moscow Rrepresentative Office of А.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
*
Author for correspondence: D.M. Atopkin, E-mail: atop82@gmail.com

Abstract

Adult trematodes, morphologically similar to Haplosplanchnus pachysomus (Eysenhardt, 1829), were extracted from the intestine of Mugil cephalus Linnaeus, 1758, collected in the Black Sea basin. Morphological, morphometric and 28S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) partial sequence data were obtained for these trematodes following comparative analysis with previous data on this species. Worms from this study were morphologically identical to all previously reported H. pachysomus specimens from different locations. The results of the morphometric analysis indicated general similarity between H. pachysomus from the Black Sea and trematodes from Vietnam and Australia. Trematodes from the Black Sea and specimens from Spain were identical based on 28S rDNA partial sequences; however, these sequences differed from that of H. pachysomus from Vietnam and Australia by eight fixed substitutions. Overall, our results indicate that H. pachysomus from Spain and the Black Sea and from Vietnam and Australia can presently be considered as two cryptic species, one in Palaearctic and one in Indo-West Pacific regions. Our results provide a molecular base for including Haplosplanchnus purii in the genus Provitellotrema or to consider H. purii, P. crenimugilis and H. pachysomus within the same genus.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akaike, H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions and Automatic Control 19, 716723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrade-Gómez, L and García-Varela, M (2021) Unexpected morphological and molecular diversity of trematode (Haploporidae: Forticulcitinae) parasites of mullets from the ocean Pacific coasts in Middle America. Parasitology Research 120(1), 5572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atopkin, DM, Beloded, AY and Ngo, HD (2015) Molecular genetic characterization of the far eastern trematode Skrjabinolecithum spasskii Belous, 1954, (Digenea, Haploporidae), a parasite of mullets. Russian Journal of Molecular Biology 49, 373379.Google Scholar
Atopkin, DM, Besprozvannykh, VV, Ha, DN, Nguyen, VH and Nguyen, VT (2020a) New species of Parasaccocoelium (Haploporidae) and new genus Pseudohaplosplanchnus (Haplosplanchnidae) from mullet fish in the Far East of Russia and Vietnam: morphological and molecular data. Journal of Helminthology e154, 18.Google Scholar
Atopkin, DM, Besprozvannykh, VV, Ha, DN, Nguyen, VH and Nguyen, VT (2020b) New species and new genus Pseudohaploporinae (Digenea): Pseudohaploporus pusitestis sp. n. and Parahaploporus elegantus n. g. sp. n. (Digenea: Pseudohaploporinae) from Vietnamese mullet fish. Parasitology International 75, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besprozvannykh, VV, Atopkin, DM, Ermolenko, AV and Nikitenko, AY (2015a) Restoration of the genus Parasaccocoelium Zhukov, 1971 (Digenea: Haploporidae) and a description of two new species from mugilid fish in the Far East of Russia. Journal of Helminthology 89(5), 565576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besprozvannykh, VV, Atopkin, DM, Ngo, HD, Beloded, AY, Ermolenko, AV, Ha, NV and Tang, NV (2015b) The trematode Skrjabinolecithum spasskii Belous, 1954 (Digenea: Haploporidae), a mullet parasite (Mugilidae) from peter the great Bay of the Sea of Japan and from from Vietnamese waters of the Gulf of Tonkin: morphology and molecular data. Russian Journal of Marine Biology 41(4), 267275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besprozvannykh, VV, Atopkin, DM, Ngo, HD, Ermolenko, AV, Ha, NV, Tang, NV and Nikitenko, AY (2016) Morphometric and molecular analyses of two digenean species from the mullet: Haplosplanchnus pachysomus (Eysenhardt, 1892) from Vietnam and Provitellotrema crenimugilis Pan, 1984 from the Russian southern Far East. Journal of Helminthology 90(2), 238244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blasco-Costa, I, Balbuena, J A, Kostadinova, A A and Olson, P D (2009) Interrelationships of the Haploporinae (Digenea: Haploporidae): A molecular test of the taxonomic framework based on morphology. Parasitology International 58, 263269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, IE (1969) Parasitological study of fish. Methods of parasitological studies. 1st edn. 108 pp. Leningrad, Science.Google Scholar
Darriba, D, Taboada, GL, Doallo, R and Posada, D (2012) Jmodeltest2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9, 772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dmitrieva, EV, Lyakh, AM, Kornyychuk, YuM, Polyakova, TA and Popyuk, MP (2015) IBSS collection of marine parasites: the collection of marine parasites maintained by the Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas. Available at http://marineparasites.org/ (accessed 30 June 2021).Google Scholar
Gajevskaja, AV and Dmitrieva, EV (1992) Haplosplanchnus pachysomus (Trematoda: Haplosplanchnidae), a parasite of mullets from Black Sea. Parasitologya 26, 385388 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Guindon, S and Gascuel, O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52, 696704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heras, S, Roldan, MI and Castro, MG (2009) Molecular phylogeny of Mugilidae fishes revised. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 19, 217231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huelsenbeck, JP, Ronquist, F, Nielsen, R and Bollback, JP (2001) Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294, 23102314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huston, DC, Cutmore, SC and Cribb, TH (2017) Molecular phylogeny of the Haplosplanchnata Olson, Cribb, Tkach, Bray and Littlewood, 2003, with a description of Schikhobalotrema huffmani n. sp. Acta Parasitologica 62(3), 502512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huston, DC, Cutmore, SC and Cribb, TH (2018) Trigonocephalotrema (Digenea: Haplosplanchnidae), a new genus for trematodes parasitising fishes of two Indo-West Pacific acanthurid genera. Invertebrate Systematics 32, 759773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, DC, Cutmore, SC, Miller, TL, Sasal, P, Smit, NJ and Cribb, TH (2021) Gorgocephalidae (Digenea: Lepocreadioidea) in the Indo-West Pacific: new species, life-cycle data and perspectives on species delineation over geographic range. Zoological Journal of Linnean Society, zlaab002. doi: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S, Stecher, G and Tamura, K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33, 18701874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockyer, AE, Olson, PD and Littlewood, DTJ (2003) Utility of complete large and small subunit rRNA genes in resolving the phylogeny of the Neodermata (platyhelminthes): implications and a review of the Cercomer theory. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 78(2), 155171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahhas, FM, Rhodes, DY and Seeto, J (1997) Digenetic trematodes of marine fishes from Suva, Fiji, family Haplosplanchnidae Poche, 1926: description of new species, a review and an update. The University of the South Pa. Suva, Fiji Islands. 93 pp.Google Scholar
Olson, PD, Cribb, TH, Tkach, VV, Bray, RA and Littlewood, DTJ (2003) Phylogeny and classification of the Digenea (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda). International Journal for Parasitology 33, 733755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posada, D (2003) Using MODELTEST and PAUP* to select a model of nucleotide substitution. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 6, 6.5.16.5.14.Google Scholar
Radujkovic, BM, Orecchia, P and Paggi, L (1989) Parasites des poisson marins du Montenegro: Digenes. Acta Adriatica 30(1/2), 137187.Google Scholar
Roskin, GI and Levinson, LB (1957) Microscopic method. 3rd edn. Moscow, Science. 476 pp.Google Scholar
Tkach, V, Grabda-Kazubska, B, Pawlowski, J and Swiderski, Z (1999) Molecular and morphological evidence for close phylogenetic affinities of the genera Macrodera, Leptophallus, Metaleptophallus and Paralepoderma [Digenea, plagiorchiata]. Acta Parasitologica 44, 3.Google Scholar
Tkach, V, Pawlowski, J and Mariaux, J (2000) Phylogenetic analysis of the suborder Plagiorchiata (Platyhelminthes, Digenea) based on partial lsrDNA sequences. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 8393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tkach, VV, Littlewood, DTJ, Olson, PD, Kinsella, JM and Swiderski, Z (2003) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Microphalloidea Ward, 1901 (Trematoda: Digenea). Systematic Parasitology 56, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, AK, Panfili, J and Durand, J-D (2012) A global review of the cosmopolitan flathead mullet Mugil cephalus Linnaeus, 1758 (Teleostei: Mugilidae), with emphasis on the biology, genetics, ecology and fisheries aspects of this apparent species complex. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 22, 641681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar