Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:40:55.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cytological studies on three hymenolepidid species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

T. Mutafova  and
S. Gergova
T. Mutafova
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, G. Bontchev Str., Block 25, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria
S. Gergova
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, G. Bontchev Str., Block 25, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The karyotypes of Vampirolepis nana, Hymenolepis diminuta and Vampirolepis erinacei (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea) have been described. The number of chromosomes in the diploid cell of the studied taxa was 2n = 12. The absolute and the relative lengths of the chromosomes of V. nana and H. diminuta were measured. The chromosomes had similar metric values. In the karyotypes of V. nana and H. diminuta there were ten one-arm chromosomes and.one two-arm chromosome (the third in length in the karyotype of V. nana and the first in length in the karyotype of H. diminuta). The chromosomes in the karyotype of V. erinacei had one arm which was proved by the terminal localization of the constitutive heterochromatin. The examined species differed in the morphology of some chromosomes in the karyotypes.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 323 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Douglas, L.T. (1962) Experimental studies on morphological variation in the cestode genus Hymenolepis. VI. Somatic pairing of chromosomes in normal and mutant strains of H. diminuta. Experimental Parasitology 12, 134–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossman, A.I. & Cain, G.D. (1981) Karyotypes and chromosome morphologies of Megalodiscus temperatus and Philophthalmus gralli. Journal of Helminthology 55, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hossain, M.N. & Jones, A.W. (1963) The chromosomes of Hymenolepis microstoma (Dujardin 1845). Journal of Parasitology 49, 305–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, A.W. (1945) Studies in cestode cytology. Journal of Parasitology 31, 213–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A.W. & Ciordia, H. (1955) A cytological race of Hymenolepis nana. Association of Southeastern Biologists Bulletin 2 (1), 8.Google Scholar
Levan, A., Fredga, K. & Sandberg, A. (1964) Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52, 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, G. & Lin, H. (1987) Studies on the cytogenetics of cestodes. I. The karyotype of Hymenolepis diminuta. Heriditas (Beijing) 9, 26–27.Google Scholar
Mutafova, T. & Vassilev, I. (1982) Karyotype of Philophthalmusspecies from Bulgaria and Georgia (Trematoda: Philophthalmidae). Kheminthologiya 14, 70–76 (In Bulgarian).Google Scholar
Schmidt, G.D. (1986) CRC handbook of tapeworm identification. 675 pp.Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press Inc.Google Scholar
Ward, E.J., Ewans, W.S. & Novak, M. (1981) Karyotype of Hymenolepis citelli (Cestoda, Cyclophyllidea). Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 23, 449–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar