Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T17:35:18.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cestodes of Pinnipeds in the Arctic and other Regions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Stanislaw Markowski
Stanislaw Markowski
Affiliation:
Associate, Department of Zoology, British Museum [Natural History].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A comparative study has been made of the Pseudophyllidean cestodes harboured by Pinnipeds, mainly from the Northern Hemisphere. Thirty species of this group of cestodes have been recorded in the literature, and as a result of the present study these may be divided into the following:

Valid species: Diphyllobothrium cordatum (Leuckart, 1868); D. elegans (Krabbe, 1865); D. glaciale (Cholodkovsky, 1915); D. hians (Diesing, 1850); D. lanceolatum (Krabbe, 1865); D. scoticum (Rennie & Reid, 1912); Diplogonoporus tetrapterus (v. Siebold, 1848); D. fasciatus (Krabbe, 1865); and Pyramicocephalus phocarum (Fabricius, 1780).

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , December 1952 , pp. 171 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ariola, V., 1896.— “Sulla. ‘Bothriotaenia plicata (Rud.)’ e suo sviluppo.” Atti Soc. liust. Sci. nat. geogr., 7, 117–126. (W.L. 2189.)Google Scholar
Ariola, V., 1896.— “ Sopra alcuni Dibotrii nuovi o poco noti e sulla classifi- cazione del genere Bothriocephalus." Atti Soc. ligust. Sci. nat. geogr., 7 261–282.Google Scholar
Ariola, V., 1896.— “Note intorno agli Elminti del Museo Zoolog. di Torino Di alcuni Bothriocephali.” Boll. Mus. Zool. Anat. comp. Torino, 11, 1–7. (W.L. 3325.)Google Scholar
Ariola, V., 1899.— “ Notizi sopra alcuni Bothriocephali del Museo Universitario di Copenhagen.– Atti Soc. ligust. Sci. nat. geogr., 10, 246–252. (W L 2189.)Google Scholar
Ariola, V., 1900.— “Revisione della famiglia Bothriocephalidae s. str.” Arch Parasit. Paris, 3, 369–484. (W.L. 1886.)Google Scholar
Baer, J. G., 1925.—Contributions to the helminth-fauna of South Africa. 79 pp Pretoria: Govt. Printing and Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Baer, J. G., 1932.— “Contribution a l&étude des Cestodes de Cétaces.” Rev Suisse Zool, 39, 195–228. (W.L. 19288.)Google Scholar
Baird, W., 1853.—Catalogue of the species of Entozoa or intestinal worms contained in the collection of the British Museum, London.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A., in Hamilton, J. E., 1934.— “The southern sea lion Otaria byronia (De Blainville).” “Discovery” Rep., 8, 306. (W.L. 7423a.)Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1945.— “ On the probable identity of a cestode of the genus DiPhvllobothrium occurring in Wales and Eire.” Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 39; 41–45. (W.L. 1063.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Blainville, M. H. D., 1828.— “Vers.” Diet. Sc. nat., 57, 365–628.Google Scholar
Blanchakd, R., 1894.—“ Notices Sur Les Parasites De L'Homme (TroisifèMc SéRie) 4. Sur Krabbea Grandis Et Rcmarques Sur La Classification Des Bothrio-CéPhalinéS.” C.R. Soc. Biol. Paris, 46, 699–702. (W.L. 6630.)Google Scholar
Brichenti, D., 1931.—“Descrizione di una nuova specie di tetrabotride parassita delle foche.” Boll. Zool., 2, 137–141. (W.L. 3402.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapin, E. A., 1925.—“Descriptions of new internal parasites.” Proc. U.S. nat. Mus., 68, 1–4. (W.L. 16944.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cholodkowsky, N. A., 1915.—“Cestodes nouveaux ou peu connus. Troisième sèrie.” Annu. Mus. zool. Acad. St. Petersb., 19, 516–523. (W.L. 8168.)Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. S., 1858.—“Observations on entozoa, with notices of several species, including an account of two experiments in regard to the breeding of Taenia serrata and T. cucumerina.” Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool., 22, 155–172. (W.L. 21544.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, A. R., 1919.—“North American Pseudophyllidean Cestodes from Fishes.” Illinois biol. Monogr., 4, 289–541. (W.L. 9822.)Google Scholar
Cooper, A. R., 1921.—“Trematoda and Cestoda of the Canadian Arctic Expedition 1913–1918.” Rep. Canad. arct. Exped., 9 (G–H.). 1–28. (W.L. 17996.)Google Scholar
Creplin, F. C., 1825.—Observationes de entozoi3. Gryphiswaldiae. 86 pp.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M., 1850.—Systema helminthum, 1. Vindobonae.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M., 1863.—“Revision der Cephalocotyleen. Abtheilung: Parame-cocotyleen.” S.B. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 48, 1 Abt. 200–345. (W.L. 20170.)Google Scholar
Drummond, F. H., 1937.—“Reports of the expedition of the McCoy Society for field investigations and research. Lady Julia Percy Island. 16. Cestoda.” Proc. roy. Soc. Vict., 49, 401–406. (W.L. 16904.)Google Scholar
Fabricius, O., 1780.—“Fauna Groenlandica.” Hafniae et Lipsiae.Google Scholar
Fabricius, O., 1793.—“Ausführliche Beschreibung der Grönlandische Seehunde.” Schrift. naturf. Gesellsch. Kopenh., 1, 2 Abt., 69–155.Google Scholar
Germanos, N. K., 1895.—“Bothriocephalus schistochilos n. sp. Ein neuer Cestode aus dem Darm von Phoca barbata.” Jena. Z. Naturw., 30, 1–38. (W.L. 10899.)Google Scholar
Guiart, J., 1935.—“Cestodes parasites provenant des campagnes scientifiques de S.A.S. Ie Prince Albert ler de Monaco (1886–1913).” Result. Camp. sci. Monaco, 91, 1–100. (W.L. 18713.)Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H., 1937.—“Entozoa from the Australian hair seal.” Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., 62, 9–16. (W.L. 16790a.)Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. and Mawson, P. M., 1941.—“Nematodes from Australian marine mammals.” Rec. Aust. Mus., 6, 429–434. (W.L. 17750.)Google Scholar
Joyeux, Ch. and Baer, J. G., 1936.—“Cestodes.” Faune Fr., 30, 613 pp. (W.L. 8338*.)Google Scholar
Krabbe, H., 1865.—“Helminthologiske undersogelser i Danmark og paa Island.” K. dansk. vidensk. Selsk., 7, 345–408. (W.L. 11861.)Google Scholar
Krabbe, H., 1874.—“Diplocotyle olrikii, en uleddet Baendelorm af bothrio-cephalcrnes Gruppe.” Vidensk. Medd. naturh. Foren. Kbh., 6, 22–25. (W.L. 22535.)Google Scholar
Leuckart, R., 1863.—Die menschlichen Parasiten. Leipzig and Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von, 1901.—“Entozoa des Zoologischen Museums der Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschafften zu St. Petersburg.” Bull. Acad. Sci. St. Petersb., 15, 271–292. (W.L. 10286.)Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von, 1903.—“Entozoa des Zoologischen Museums der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschafften zu St. Pètersbourg II.” Annu. Mus. zool. Acad. St. Petersb., 8, 1–30. (W.L. 8168.)Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von, 1904.—“Neue Helminthen.” Zbl. Bakt. I Abt. Orig., 37, 678–683. (W.L. 23684.)Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von, 1905.—“Helminthen aus Ceylon und arktischen Breiten.” Z. wiss. Zool., 82, 182–193. (W.L. 23635.)Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von, 1905.—“Helminthen der russischen Polarexpedition 1900–1903.” Mèm. Acad. I. Sci. St. Petersb., 18, 1–17. (W.L. 23241.)Google Scholar
Lonnbero, E., 1892.—“Zwei Parasiten aus Walfischen und zwei aus Lamna ‘cornxibica (Anatomische Studien Über skandinavische Cestoden).” K. svenska Vetensk. Akad. Handl., 24, 28 pp. (W.L. 11870.)Google Scholar
Lühe, M., 1899.—“Zur Anatomie und Systematik der Bothriocephaliden.” Verh. dtsch. zool. Ges., 30–55. (W.L. 22270.)Google Scholar
Lyster, L. L., 1940.—“Parasites of some Canadian sea mammals.” Canad. J. Res., 18, 395–409. (W.L. 5898c.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowski, S., 1949.—“On the species of Diphyllobothrium occurring in birds, and their relation to man and other hosts.” J. Helminth., 23, 107–126. (W.L. I1224b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowski, S., 1952.—“The Cestodes of Seals from the Antarctic.” Brit. Bull. (nat. Hist.), 1, 125–150. (W.L. 3930f.)Google Scholar
Matz, F., 1892—“Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Bothriocephalen.” Arch. Naturgesch., 1, 97–122. (W.L. 1782.)Google Scholar
Meggitt, F. J., 1924.—“On the life history of a reptilian tapeworm (Sparganum reptans).” Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 18, 195–204. (W.L. 1063.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meggitt, F. J., 1924.—The Cestodes of Mammals. 282 pp. London.Google Scholar
Monticelli, F. S., 1889.—“Notes on some Entozoa in the collection of the British Museum.” Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 321–325. (W.L. 1696b.)Google Scholar
Monticelli, F. S., 1890.—“Note elmintologiche.” Boll. Soc. Nat. Napoli, 4, 189–208. (W.L. 3382.)Google Scholar
Müller, O. F., 1776.—“Zoologiae Danicae prodromus, seu animalium Daniae et Norvegiae indigenarum characteres, nomina et synonyma imprimis popularium.” 282 pp. Havniae.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nvdelin, O., 1931. “Saügetier-und Vogelcestoden Von Juan Fernandez.” Nat. Hist. Juan Fernandez and Easter Island, 3, 493–524.Google Scholar
Parona, C., 1896.—“Note intorno agli Elminti del Museo Zoologico di Torino." Boll. Mus. Zool. Anal. comp. Torino, 11, 1–6. (W.L. 3325.)Google Scholar
Rennie, J. and Reid, A., 1912. —“The Cestoda of the Scottish Antarctic Expe-dition (Scotia).” Trans. roy. Soc. Edinb., 48, 441–453. (W.L. 21652.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1810.—Entozoorum sive vermium intestinalium historia naturalis. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1819. Entozoorum synopsis. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Ries, H., 1939.—“Die bisher bei Kleinen Tümmler (Phocaena phocaena L.) festgestellten Parasiten.” Z. Bakt. Abt. I Orig., 145, 89–106. (W.L. 23684.)Google Scholar
Siebold, C. T. E. Von., 1848.—Lehrbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie der wirbelloscn Thiere. Berlin.Google Scholar
Siebold, C. T. E. Von, 1848.—“Bericht über die Leistungcn in Gebicte der Helminthologie während die Jahre 1845, 1846 und 1847.” Arch. Naturgesch., 2, 351–398. (W.L. 1782.)Google Scholar
Southwell, T. and Walker, A. J., 1936.—“Notes on a larval Cestode from a fur-seal.” Ann. trap. Med. Parasit., 30, 91–100. (W.L. 1063.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, Ch. W. and Hassall, A., 1899.—“Internal parasites of the fur seal.” The Fur Seals and Fur-Seal Islands of the North Pacific Ocean, pt. 3, 99–177.Google Scholar
Stunkard, H. W., 1948.—“Pseudophyllidean Cestodes from Alaskan Pinnipeds.” J. Parasit., 34, 211–228. (W.L. 11428.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stunkard, H. W. and SchoenbornH, W. H, W., 1936. —“Notes on the structure, distribution, and synonomy of Diphyllobothrium lanceolalum.” Amer. Mm. Novit. (880), 1–9. (W.L. 650.)Google Scholar
Vergeer, T., 1935.—“ The origin of the genus Diplogonoporus Ldnnberg, 1892.” J. Parasit., 21, 133–135. (W.L. 11428.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacin, W. L., 1933. “Zur Frage der Helmintofauna Pinnipedia.” Trans, arct. Inst., 3, 51–59. (W.L. 21805a.)Google Scholar
Wardle, R. A. and Mcleod, J. A., 1952.—The zoology of tapeworms. 780 pp. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Wardle, E. R. A., Mcleod, D. A., and Stewart, I. E., 1947. —“ Luhe's ‘Diphy- Uobothrium’ (Cestoda).” J Parasit., 33, 319–330. (W.L. 11428).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1951.—“Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 47. Cestodes of marine mammals and birds.” Arb. med. Univ. Okayama, 7, 307–314. (W.L. 1667a.)Google Scholar
Zeder, J. G. H., 1800.—Erster Nachtrag zur Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewürmer mit Zufasten und Anmcrkungen herausgegeben XX+320 pp. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zeder, J. G. H., 1803.— Anleitung zur Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewurmer XVI+432 pp. Bamberg.Google Scholar
Zschokke, F., 1903.—“Die arktischen Cestoden.” Fauna arct. Jena, 3, 1–32. (W.L. 8332a.)Google Scholar