Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T22:16:44.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anuran helminth communities from contrasting nature reserve and pasture sites in the Pantanal wetland, Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2016

K.M. Campião*
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Brasil
A.C.A Ribas
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Computação, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil
I.C.O. Silva
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil
G.T. Dalazen
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil
L.E.R Tavares
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil

Abstract

Studies of amphibian macroparasites are relevant for the investigation of parasite community ecology and disease dynamics. Here, the parasite communities of five anuran species (Hypsiboas raniceps, Phyllomeduza azurea, Pseudis paradoxa, Leptodactylus fuscus and Leptodactylus podicipinus) are described from two habitats with different levels of preservation (pasture versus nature reserve). Specifically, we used mixed-effect models to test whether helminth species richness, prevalence and abundance differ between the two host collection sites. A total of 120 anuran individuals and 25 helminth parasite taxa were collected. Helminth communities differed between collection sites and among host species. In general, helminth species richness, prevalence and abundance were higher in hosts collected in the pond from the nature reserve. In all, these data help fill the gap in parasite biodiversity knowledge in a changing area, within a sensitive group of vertebrate hosts.

Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aho, J.M. (1990) Helminth communities of amphibians and reptiles: comparative approaches to understanding patterns and processes. pp. 157195 in Esch, G.W., Bush, A.O. & Aho, J.M. (Eds) Parasite communities: patterns and processes. New York, Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R.C. (2000) Nematode parasites of vertebrates: Their development and transmission. 2rd edn. 672 pp. Oxford, CABI International.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. (2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–6. Available at http://CRAN.R–project.org/package = lme4 (accessed accessed 9 August 2015).Google Scholar
Bush, A.O., Lafferty, K.D., Lotz, J.M. & Shostak, W. (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575583.Google Scholar
Bush, A.O., Fernández, J.C., Esch, G.W. & Seed, R. (2001) Parasitism: The diversity and ecology of animal parasites. 2rd edn. 510 pp. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caramaschi, U. & Cruz, G.A.C. (2002) Phyllomedusa: posição taxonômica, hábitos e biologia (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Phyllomedusa 1, 510.Google Scholar
Catalano, S.R., Whittington, I.D., Donnellan, S.C. & Gillanders, B.M. (2013) Parasites as biological tags to assess host population structure: guidelines, recent genetic advances and comments on a holistic approach. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 3, 220226.Google Scholar
De-Carvalho, C.B., Freitas, E.B., Faria, R.G., Batista, R.C., Batista, C.C., Coelho, W.A. & Bocchiglieri, A. (2008) História natural de Leptodactylus mystacinus e Leptodactylus fuscus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) no Cerrado do Brasil Central. Biota Neotropica 8, 105116.Google Scholar
Hamann, M.I., Kehr, A.I. & González, C.E. (2006) Species affinity and infracommunity ordination of helminths of Leptodactylus chaquensis (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in two contrasting environments from northeastern Argentina. Journal of Parasitology 92, 11711179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, M.B., Tomas, W., Mourão, G., Da Silva, C.J., Guimarães, E., Sonoda, F. & Fachim, E. (2005) Safeguarding the Pantanal wetlands: threats and conservation initiatives. Conservation Biology 19, 714720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartson, R.B., Orlofske, S.A., Melin, V.E., Dillon, R.T. & Johnson, P.T.J. (2011) Land use and wetland spatial position jointly determine amphibian parasite communities. EcoHealth 8, 485500.Google Scholar
Jensen, J., Diao, X. & Hansen, A.D. (2009) Single- and two-species tests to study effects of the anthelmintics ivermectin and morantel and the coccidiostatic monensin on soil invertebrates. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 28, 316323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, P.T.J. & Chase, J.M. (2004) Parasites in the food web: linking amphibian malformations and aquatic eutrophication. Ecology Letters 7, 521526.Google Scholar
King, K.C., Mclaughlin, J.D., Gendron, A.D., Pauli, B.D., Giroux, I., Rondeau, B., Boily, M., Juneau, P. & Marcogliese, D.J. (2007) Impacts of agriculture on the parasite communities of northern leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) in southern Quebec, Canada. Parasitology 134, 20632080.Google Scholar
King, K.C., Mclaughlin, J.D., Boily, M. & Marcogliese, D.J. (2010) Effects of agricultural landscape and pesticides on parasitism in native bullfrogs. Biological Conservation 143, 302310.Google Scholar
Koprivnikar, J., Forbes, M.R. & Baker, R.L. (2006) Environmental factors influencing trematode prevalence in the grey treefrog (Hyla versicolor) tadpoles in southern Ontario. Journal of Parasitology 92, 9971001.Google Scholar
Koprivnikar, J., Marcogliese, D.J., Rohr, J.R., Orlofske, S.A., Raffel, T.R. & Johnson, P.T. (2012) Macroparasite infections of amphibians: what can they tell us? EcoHealth 9, 342360.Google Scholar
Lucas, M.E., Brasileiro, A.C., Oyamaguchia, M.H. & Martinsa, M. (2008) The reproductive ecology of Leptodactylus fuscus (Anura, Leptodactylidae): new data from natural temporary ponds in the Brazilian Cerrado and a review throughout its distribution. Journal of Natural History 42, 23052320.Google Scholar
Lumaret, J.P., Errouissi, F., Floate, F., Römbke, J. & Wardhaugh, K. (2012) A review on the toxicity and non-target effects of macrocyclic lactones in terrestrial and aquatic environments. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology 13, 10041060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcogliese, D.J. (2004) Parasites: small players with crucial roles in the ecological theatre. EcoHealth 1, 151164.Google Scholar
Marcogliese, D.J. (2005) Parasites of the superorganism: are they indicators of ecosystem health? International Journal for Parasitology 35, 705716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martins, I.A. (2001) Parental care behaviour in Leptodactylus podicipinus (COPE, 1862) (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Herpetological Journal 11, 2932.Google Scholar
McKenzie, V.J. (2007) Human land use and patterns of parasitism in tropical amphibian hosts. Biological Conservation 137, 102116.Google Scholar
Nieberding, C., Morand, S., Libois, R. & Michaux, J.R. (2004) A parasite reveals cryptic phylogeographic history of its host. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271, 25592568.Google Scholar
Poulin, R. (1997) Species richness of parasite assemblages: evolution and patterns. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 28, 341358.Google Scholar
Poulin, R. (2007) Are there general laws in parasite ecology? Parasitology 134, 763776.Google Scholar
Poulin, R. & Morand, S. (2004) Parasite biodiversity. 216 pp. Washington, DC, Smithsonian Institution Books.Google Scholar
Prado, C.P.A., Uetanabaro, M. & Lopes, F.S. (2000) Reproductive strategies of Leptodactylus chaquensis and Leptodactylus podicipinus in the Pantanal, Brazil. Journal of Herpetology 34, 135139.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.r-project.org/ (accessed accessed 9 August 2015).Google Scholar
Rodrigues, J.D., Uetanabaro, M. & Prado, C.A. (2004) Seasonal and ontogenetic variation in diet composition of Leptodactylus podicipinus (Anura, Leptodactylidae) in the southern Pantanal, Brazil. Revista Española de Herpetología 18, 1928.Google Scholar
Rohr, J.R., Schotthoefer, A.M., Raffel, T.R., Carrick, H.J., Halstead, N., Hoverman, J.T., Johnson, C.M., Johnson, L.B., Lieske, C., Piwoni, M.D., Schoff, P.K. & Beasley, V.R. (2008) Agrochemicals increase trematode infections in a declining amphibian species. Nature 455, 12351239.Google Scholar
Schotthoefer, A.M., Rohr, J.R., Cole, R.A., Koehler, A.V., Johnson, C.M., Johnson, L.B. & Beasley, V.R. (2011) Effects of wetland and landscape variables on parasite communities of Rana pipiens: links to anthropogenic changes. Ecological Applications 21, 12571271.Google Scholar
Spratt, D.M. (1997) Endoparasite control strategies: implications for biodiversity of native fauna. International Journal for Parasitology 27, 173180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugai, M.M.L.J., Terra, S.J. & Ferreira, L.V. (2012) Diet of Leptodactylus fuscus (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae) in the Pantanal of Miranda river, Brazil. Biota Neotropica (online) 12, 11.Google Scholar
Sures, B. (2004) Environmental parasitology: relevancy of parasites in monitoring environmental pollution. Trends Parasitology 20, 170177.Google Scholar
Uetanabaro, M., Prado, C.P.A., Rodrigues, D.J., Gordo, M. & Campos, Z. (2008) Guia de Campo dos Anuros do Pantanal Sul e Planaltos de Entorno. pp. 82162. Campo Grande, MS, Editora UFMS.Google Scholar
Vidal-Martínez, V., Pech, D., Sures, B., Purucker, S.T. & Poulin, R. (2010) Can parasites really reveal environmental impact? Trends in Parasitology 26, 4451.Google Scholar
Von Sperling, M. (1996) Introdução à qualidade das águas e ao tratamento de esgotos. 2rd edn. 243 pp. Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Campião Supplementary Material

Table

Download Campião Supplementary Material(File)
File 120.3 KB