Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:23:26.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acquired resistance to experimental Heterakis gallinarum infections in pheasants: Relative immunity conferred by exposure to heterakids of different ages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Anne M. Chute  and
Everett E. Lund
Everett E. Lund
Affiliation:
Animal Parasitology Institute, Agriculdtural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ring-necked pheasants were exposed to artificially limited 10-day infections with heterakids either from 0-10 or 10–20 days old. The number and length of worms developing from a subsequent challenge dose were compared with those in nonimmunized control birds and with those in birds that had been exposed to a continuous immunizing infection for a total of 49 days: 28 days before challenge and 21 days during the challenge infection.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , September 1974 , pp. 155 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allewijn, F. and Marsboom, R. (1967) Relative deposition of the anthelmintic tetramisole in eggs and poultry tissues. Poultry Science, 46, 388–391.Google Scholar
Coapham, P. A. (1934) Some observations on the response of chickens to infestation with Heterakis gallinae. Journal of Helminthology, 12, 71–78.Google Scholar
Dobson, C. (1972) Immune response to gastrointestinal helminths. In Immunity to Animal Parasites (ed. Soulsby, E. J. L.) pp.191–222. Academic Press: New York and London.Google Scholar
Kates, K. C, Colglazier, M. L. and Enzie, F. D. (1969) Comparative efficacy of levo-tetramisole, parbendazole, and piperazine citrate against some common helminths of turkeys. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 88, 142–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, E. E. (1958) Growth and development of Heterakis gallinae in turkeys and chickens infected with Histomonas meleagridis. Journal of Parasitology, 44, 297–301.Google Scholar
Lund, E. E. (1967) Acquired resistance to experimental Heterakis infections in chickens and turkeys: effect on the transmission of Histomonas meleagridis. Journal of Helminthology, 41, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, E. E. and Chute, A. M. (1972a) The ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus torquatus) as a host for Heterakis gallinarum and Histomonas meleagridis. American Midland Naturalist, 87, 1–7.Google Scholar
Lund, E. E. and Chute, A. M. (1972b) Transfer of ten-day Heterakis gallinarum larvae: effect on retention and development of the heterakids, and liberation of Histomonas and Parahistomonas. Experimental Parasitology, 31, 361–369.Google Scholar
Lund, E. E. and Chute, A. M. (1972c) Reciprocal responses of eight species of galliform birds and three parasites: Heterakis gallinarum, Histomonas meleagridis, and Parahistomonas wenrichi. Journal of Parasitology, 58, 940–945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, E. E. and Chute, A. M. (1973a) Reciprocal transfer of Heterakis gallinarum larvae between chickens and chukar partridges: effects on H. gallinarum, Histomonas meleagridis, and Parahistomonas wenrichi. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 40, 153–157.Google Scholar
Lund, E. E. and Chute, A. M. (1973b) Two consecutive transfers of Heterakis gallinarum: effects on caecal worms and on histomonads. Journal of Helminthology, 47, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, E. E. and Chute, A. M. (1974) Reciprocal transfer of Heterakis gallinarum larvae between ringnecked pheasants and Japanese quail: effects on H. gallinarum, Histomonas meleagridis, and Parahistomonas wenrichi. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 41, 73–76.Google Scholar
Lund, E. E. and Chute, A. M.The reproductive potential of Heterakis gallinarum in various species of galliform birds: implications for survival of H. gallinarum and Histomonas meleagridis to recent times. International Journal of Parasitology, (in press).Google Scholar
Pankavich, J. A., Poeschel, G. P., Shor, A. L. and Gallo, A. (1973) Evaluation of levamisole against experimental infections of Ascaridia, Heterakis, and Capillaria spp. in chickens. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 34, 501–505.Google Scholar
Thienpont, D., Vanparijs, O. F. J., Raeymaekers, A. H. M., Vandenbark, J., Demoen, P. J. A., Allewijn, F. T. N., Marsboom, R. P. H., Niemegeers, C. J. E., Schellekens, K. H. L. and Janssen, P. A. J. (1966) Tetramisole (R8299), a new, potent broad spectrum anthelmintic. Nature, 209,1084–1086.Google Scholar