Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T00:22:07.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of the Larval Stages of Haemonchus placei Infections of Cattle in Immunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

John G. Ross
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Division, The Farm, Stormont, Belfast

Extract

Using the larvicidal anthelmintic “Neguvon”, infections of calves with H. placei were terminated at the time of the moult from the fourth to the fifth stage. A comparison was then made between the level of immunity developed by calves which had experienced, third and fourth stages, third, fourth and fifth stages, and parasite free calves. The results suggested that the principal stage necessary to produce a substantial immunity was the fifth. Evidence was also produced to associate a local reaction in the abomasum characterised by oedema and aggregations of eosinophils in the mucosa with immunity to challenge.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bremner, K. C, 1950.—“The parasitic life-cycle of Haemonchus placei (Place) Ransom (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae).” Aust.J. Zool., 4, 146151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riek, R. F., and Keitii, R. K.t 1958.—“Studies on anthelmintics for cattle: IV. The organic phosphorous compound 0, 0-dimethyl 2, 2, 2, —trichloro-1-hydroxymethyl phosphonate (Bayer LI3/59).” Aust. Vet. J., 34, 93103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, F. H. S., 1957.—“Reactions of calves to infestation with the stomach worm, Haemonchus placei (Place, 1893) Ransom, 1911.” Aust. J. agric Res., 8, 740767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, F. H. S. and Keith, R. K1959.—“Observations on the effect of treatment with phenothiazine on the development of resistance by calves to. infestation with the stomach worm, Haemonchus placei (Place, 1893) Ransom, 1911.” Aust. vet. J., 35, 409414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. G., 1960.—“Normal serum albumen values in Nigerian Zebu cattle.” Vet. Rec, 72, 159161.Google Scholar
Ross, J. G. and Armour, J., 1960.—“The significance of faecal egg counts and the use of serum albumen levels and packed cell volume percentages to assess pathogenicity of helminthiasis.” Vet. Rec, 72, 137139.Google Scholar
Ross, J. G. 1962.—“Further observations on helminthiasis in Nigerian Zebu cattle. The serological response.” Brit. vet. J., 118, 6670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. G., Armour, J., Hart, J. A., and Lee, R. P., 1959.—“Haemonchus spp. X-irradiated vaccine in Nigerian Zebu cattle.” Vet. Rec, 71, 751.Google Scholar
Ross, J. G., Armour, J., and Hart, J. A., 1962.—“Investigations of hacmonchosis in Nigerian Zebu cattle.” J. Parasitol., 48, 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D. F., 1953.—“Studies on resistance of sheep to infestation with Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus spp. and on the immunological reactions of sheep exposed to infestation. V. The nature of the ‘Self Cure’ phenomenon.” Aust. J. agric, Res., 4, 100117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E. L., 1934.—“A method of estimating the number of worms present in the fourth stomach and small intestine of sheep and cattle for the definite diagnosis of parasitic gastro-enteritis.” Vet. Rec, 14, 474476.Google Scholar