Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T05:56:32.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

No. 2. Hand-list of Helminth Parasites of the Rabbit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Imperial Bureau of Agricultural Parasitology: Notes and Memoranda
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , May 1931 , pp. 105 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailliet, C., 1866.—“Histoire naturelle des Helminthes des principaux mammifères domestiques,” Paris, 172 pp.Google Scholar
Baird, W., 1853.—“Catalogue of the species of entozoa, or intestinal worms, contained in the collection of the British Museum,” London, 132 pp., 2 pl.Google Scholar
Bancroft, T. L., 1893.—“On the whip worm of the rat's liver,” J. Roy. Soc. N.S.W., Vol. XXVII, pp. 86–90, pls. 7–8. (W.L. 11492.)Google Scholar
Batsch, A., 1786.—“Naturgeschichte der Bandwurmgattung überhaupt und ihrer Arten insbesondere, nach den neuern Beobachtungen in einem systematischen Auszuge,” Halle, 298 pp., 5 pl.Google Scholar
Bellingham, O'B., 1844.—“Catalogue of Irish entozoa, with observations,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Vol. XIV, (90), pp. 162–165. (W.L. 1050.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beneden, P. J. v., 1861.—“Mémoire sur les vers intestinaux,” C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, (Suppl.), Vol. II, pp. 1–376, pls. 1–27. (W.L. 6628.)Google Scholar
Blanchard, R., 1891a.—“Sur les helminthes des primates anthropoïdes,” Mém. Soc. Zool. Fr., Vol. IV, (1–2), pp. 186–196, figs. 1–4. (W.L. 13343.)Google Scholar
Blanchard, R., 1891b.—“Notices helminthologiques, 2me sér.,” Mém. Soc. Zool. Fr., Vol. IV, (3–4), pp. 420–489, figs. 1–38. (W.L. 13343.)Google Scholar
Bloch, M. E., 1780.—“Beytrag zur Naturgeschichte der Blasenwürmer,” Schr. Berl. Ges. naturf. Fr., Vol. I, pp. 335–347, pl. 10.Google Scholar
Bossuat, E., 1902.—“Les helminthes dans le foie,” Arch. Parasit. Paris, Vol. VI, pp. 161–199. (W.L. 1886.)Google Scholar
Braun, M., 1901.—“Ein neues Dicrocœlium aus der Gallenblase der Zibethkatze,” Zbl. Bakt., Abt. 1, Vol. XXX, (18), pp. 700–702, 1 fig. (W.L. 23684.)Google Scholar
Chandler, A. C., 1924.—“Some parasitic roundworms of the rabbit with description of two new species,” Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., Vol. LXVI, Article 16, pp. 1–6, pls. 1–2. (W.L. 16944.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbold, T. S., 1858.—“Observations on entozoa…,” Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool., Vol. XXII, (3), 155–172, pls. 31–33. (W.L. 21543.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbold, T. S. 1862.—“Remarks on all the human entozoa,” Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., (18–20), pp. 288–315. (W.L. 16737.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbold, T. S. 1883.—“Description of Ligula Mansoni, a new human cestode,” J. Linn. Soc. Zool., Vol. XVII, pp. 78–83, 4 figs. (W.L. 11296.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, C. W., 1910.—“Tropical medicine and hygiene…with a chapter on snakes by A. Alcock…Pt. 2: Diseases due to the metazoa,” London, viii + 283 pp., 98 figs., 1 pl.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M., 1850.—“Systema helminthum,” Vindobonæ, Vol. I, xiii + 679 pp.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M. 1851.—“Systema helminthum,” Vindobonæ, Vol. II, vi + 588 pp.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M. 1863.—“Revision der Cephalocotyleen. Abtheilung: Paramecocotyleen,” SitzBer. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Vol. XLVIII, 1 Abt., pp. 200–345. (W.L. 20170.)Google Scholar
Douthitt, H., 1915.—“Studies on the cestode family Anoplocephalidæ,” Illinois Biol. Monog., Vol. I, (3), pp. 355–436, 6 pl. (W.L. 9822.)Google Scholar
Dujardin, F., 1845.—“Histoire naturelle des helminthes ou vers intestinaux,” Paris, xvi + 654 + 15 pp., 12 pl.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fibiger, J., & Ditlevsen, H., 1914.—“Contributions to the biology and morphology of Spiroptera (Gongylonema) neoplastica n. sp.,” Kobenhavn, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Frölich, J. A. v., 1789.—“Beschreibungen einiger neuen Eingeweidewürmer,” Naturforscher. Vol. XXIV, pp. 101–162, pl. 4.Google Scholar
Frölich, J. A. v. 1802.—“Beytrãge zur Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewürmer,” Naturforscher, Vol. XXIX, pp. 5–96, 46 figs.Google Scholar
Galli-Valerio, B., 1909.—“Notes de parasitologie et de technique parasitologique,” Zbl. Bakt., Abt. 1, Vol. L, 538. (W.L. 23684.)Google Scholar
Galli-Valerio, B. 1910.—“Notes de parasitologie et de technique parasitologique,” Zbl. Bakt., Abt. 1, Vol. LVI, pp. 43–47. (W.L. 23684.)Google Scholar
Gedoelst, L., 1911.—“Synopsis de parasitologie de l'homme et des animaux domestiques,” Lierre + 332 pp., 327 figs.Google Scholar
Gervais, H., 1847.—“Sur quelques entozoaires tænioides et hydatides,” Mém. Acad. Montpellier, Vol. I, pp. 85–103, pl. 1–2. (W.L. 13229.)Google Scholar
Goeze, J. A. E., 1782.—“Versuch einer Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewürmer thierischer Körper,” Blankenburg, xi + 471 pp., 44 pls.Google Scholar
Grassi, G. B., 1885.—“Contribuzione allo studio della nostra fauna,” Atti Acc. gioenia, ser. 3, Vol. XVIII, pp. 241–252. (W.L. 2113.)Google Scholar
Graybill, H. W., 1923.—“A new genus of nematodes from the domestic rabbit,” Parasitology, Vol. XV, pp. 340–342, pl. 11. (W.L. 16035.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graybill, H. W. 1924.—“A new species of roundworm of the genus Trichostrongylus from the rabbit,” Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., Vol. LXVI, Article 11, pp. 1–3, 1 pl. (W.L. 16944.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. C., 1916.—“Nematode parasites of mammals of the orders Rodentia, Lagomorpha and Hyracoidea,” Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., Vol. L, pp. 1–258. (W.L. 16944.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. C. 1919.—“The adult tænioid cestodes of dogs and cats, and of related carnivores in North America,” Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., Vol. LV, pp. 1–94. (W.L. 16944.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janicki, C. v., 1906.—“Studien an Säugetiercestoden,” Z. wiss. Zool., Vol. LXXXI, pp. 505–597. (W.L. 23635.)Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H., 1909a.—“Notes on Australian entozoa, No. I,” Rec. Aust. Mus., Vol. VII, pp. 329–344. (W.L. 17736.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T. H. 1909b.—“Notes on some Australian parasites,” Agric. Gaz. N.S.W., Vol. XX, pp. 581–584. (W.L. 278.)Google Scholar
Kunsemüller, F., 1903.—“Zur Kenntnis der polycephalen Blasenwürmer, insbesondere des Cœnurus cerebralis Rudolphi und des C. serialis Gervais,” Zool. Jahrb., Vol. XVIII, (4), pp. 507–538, figs. A-C, pls. 47–50. (W.L. 23831.)Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1904.—“Researches in helminthology and parasitology. With a bibliography of his contributions to science, arranged and edited by Joseph Leidy, jr.,” Washington, 281 pp.Google Scholar
Leske, N. G., 1780.—“Von dem Drehen der Schafe und den Blasenbandwurme im Gehirne derselben, als die Ursache dieser Krankheit,” Leipzig, 52 pp., 1 pl.Google Scholar
Leuckart, K. G. F. R., 1856.—“Die Blasenbandwürmer und ihre Entwicklung. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Cysticercus-Leber,” Giessen, 162 pp., 3 pl.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leske, N. G. 1863.—“Die menschlichen Parasiten,” Arch. Sci. phys. nat., n. ser., Vol. XVI, pp. 243–245. (W.L. 1907.)Google Scholar
Leske, N. G. 1865.—“Bericht über die wissenschaftlichen Leistungen in der Naturgeschichte der niederen Thiere während der Jahre 1864 und 1865 (Erste Hälfte),” Arch. Naturgesch., Vol. II, pp. 165–268. (W.L. 1782.)Google Scholar
Leske, N. G. 1886.—“Die Parasiten des Menschen und die von ihnen herrührenden Krankheiten. Ein Hand- und Lehrbuch für Naturforscher und Aerzte,” Leipzig & Heidelberg, 2nd Edit., Vol. I, lief .3, (1 Abt.), xxxi ⊞ 855–1000 pp., 57 figs.Google Scholar
Limbourg, J. P. de, 1767.—“Observationes de ascaridibus et cucurbitinis, et potissimum de Tœnia, tam humana quam leporina,” Philos. Trans., Vol. LVI, pp. 126–132, 1 pl. (W.L. 16192.)Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1758.—“Systema naturæ…,” 10th Edit., Holmiæ, 823 pp.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. v., 1878.—“Compendium der Helminthologie,” Hannover, xxii + 382 pp.Google Scholar
Meggitt, F. J., 1924.—“The Cestodes of Mammals,” London, 282 pp.Google Scholar
Moniez, R., 1880a.—“Essai monographique sur les cysticerques,” Thèse, Lille, 190 pp., 3 pl.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moniez, R. 1880b.—“Études sur les cestodes,” Bull. sci. Nord., Vol. XII, pp. 240–246.Google Scholar
Moniez, R. 1880c.—“Un spiroptère d'espèce nouvelle,” Bull. sci. Nord, Vol. XII, (11), pp. 447–448.Google Scholar
Neumann, G. R., 1905.—“A treatise on the parasites and parasitic diseases of the domesticated animals,” (Transl.: G., Fleming), London, 2nd Edit., xvi + 697 pp., 365 figs.Google Scholar
Neveu-Lemaire, M., 1912.—“Parasitologie des animaux domestiques: maladies parasitaires non-bactériennes,” Paris, ii + 1257 pp. 770 figs.Google Scholar
Nicoll, W., 1923.—“A reference list of the trematode parasites of British mammals,” Parasitology, Vol. XV, pp. 236–253. (W.L. 16035.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, R., 1835.—“Description of a microscopic entozoon infesting the muscles of the human body,” Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. I, pp. 315–324, pl. 41. (W.L. 21702.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallas, P. S., 1781.—“Bemerkungen über die Bandwürmer in Menschen und Thieren,” N. nord. Beytr. phys. geogr. Naturges. Oekon., St. Petersb. & Leipzig, Vol. I, (1), pp. 39–112, pls. 2–3.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1886.—“Élements de zoologie médicale et agricole,” Paris, Fasc. 2, XV + 801–1053 pp., figs. 587–705.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. 1890.—“Les parasites des animaux domestiques au Japon,” Naturaliste, ser. 2, Vol. IV, pp. 142–143. (W.L. 14894.)Google Scholar
Railliet, A. 1893.—“Traité de zoologie médicale et agricole,” Paris, 2nd Edit., Fasc. 1, 736 pp., 494 figs.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. 1899.—“Anomalies des scolex chez le Cænurus serialis,” C.R. Soc. Biol. Paris, Vol. LI, (2), pp. 18–21. (W.L. 6630.)Google Scholar
Reinitz, G., 1885.—“Mittheilungen über einen bisher noch wenig bekannten Blasenwurm,” Dissertation, Dorpat, 43 pp., 1 pl., 8 figs.Google Scholar
Riehm, G., 1881.—“Studien an Cestoden,” Halle a. S., 66 pp., pl. 5–6.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1803.—“Neue Beobachtungen über die Eingeweidewürmer,” Arch. Zool. Zool., Brnschwg., Vol. III, (2), pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A. 1804.—“Bemerkungen aus dem Gebiet der Naturgeschichte…1 Theil,” Berlin, viii + 296 pp.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A. 1809.—“Entozoorum sive vermium intestinalium historia naturalis,” Amstelaedami, Vol. II, Pt. 1, 457 pp., pl. 7–12.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A. 1810.—“Entozoorum sive vermium intestinalium historia naturalis,” Amstelaedami, Vol. II, Pt. 2, XII + 386 pp.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A. 1819.—“Entozoorum synopsis cui accedunt mantissa duplex et indices locupletissimi,” Berolini, X + 811 pp., 3 pl.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, C. W., 1896.—“A revision of the adult tapeworms of hares and rabbits,” Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., Vol. XIX, pp. 145–235, pl. 5–25. (W.L. 16944.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, C. W. 1906.—“Illustrated key to the cestode parasites of man,” Bull. U.S. Hyg. Lab., No. 25, pp. 1–104, figs. 1–166. (W.L. 4295.)Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W., & Hassall, A., 1893.—“A revision of the adult cestodes of cattle, sheep and allied animals,” Bull. U.S. Bur. Anim. Ind., No. 4, 134 pp., pl. 1–16. (W.L. 5642.)Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. 1896.—“Notes on Parasites, Nos. 42–46,” Vet. Mag. Philad., Vol. III, (3), pp. 151–161, figs. 1–4.Google Scholar
Stossich, M., 1900.—“Osservazione elmintologiche,” Boll. Soc. adriat. Sci. nat. Trieste, Vol. XX, pp. 89–103, pl. 6. (W.L. 3359.)Google Scholar
Tschudi, A., 1873.—“Die Blasenwürmer. Ein monographischer versuch,” Freiburg im Breisgau, 75 pp., 2 pl.Google Scholar
Wedl, C., 1856.—“Ueber einige Nematoden,” SitzBer. Akad. Wiss. Wien., Vol. XIX, pp. 122–134, 1 pl. (W.L. 20170.)Google Scholar
Yorke, W., & Maplestone, P. A., 1926—“The nematode parasites of vertebrates,” London, xi + 536 pp., 307 figs.Google Scholar
Yoshida, S., 1917.—“The occurrence of Bothriocephalus liguloides Leuckart, with especial reference to its development,” J. Parasit., Vol. III, pp. 171–176. (W.L. 11428.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeder, J. G. H., 1800.—“Erster Nachtrag zur Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewürmer, mit Zufässen und Anmerkungen herausgegeben,” Leipzig, XX + 320 pp., 6 pl.Google Scholar
Zeder, J. G. H. 1803.—“Anleitung zur Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewürmer,” Bamberg, xvi + 432 pp., 4 pl.Google Scholar