Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T20:54:15.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular analysis of selected paramphistome isolates from cattle in southern Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2015

S. Dube*
Affiliation:
National University of Science and Technology Department of Applied Biology and Biochemistry, PO Box AC939 Ascot, Bulawayo
M.S. Sibula
Affiliation:
National University of Science and Technology Department of Applied Biology and Biochemistry, PO Box AC939 Ascot, Bulawayo
Z. Dhlamini
Affiliation:
National University of Science and Technology Department of Applied Biology and Biochemistry, PO Box AC939 Ascot, Bulawayo

Abstract

Paramphistomes are parasites of domestic and wild ruminants, the effects of which in animal health remain underestimated. Very few studies in Africa have been done using molecular techniques to resolve situations associated with taxonomical groupings and epidemiology of these parasites. In this study, the genetic variability of nine representative paramphistome isolates collected from southern African countries, namely Botswana, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe, was assessed using both morphological and internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) rDNA sequence data. Morphological characterization and identification were carried out using median sagittal sections of the paramphistomes. DNA of the individual paramphistomes was isolated, the ITS2 rDNA was amplified, purified and sequenced. The sequences were submitted to GenBank, which assigned them the following accession numbers: KP639631, KP639630, KP639632, KP639633, KP639634, KP639635, KP639636, KP639637 and KP639638. These sequences were used for phylogenetic analysis using MEGA 6. Morphological characterization revealed three species of paramphistomes belonging to three different sub-families: one Stephanopharynx compactus isolate, a member of the Stephanopharyngidae sub-family; one Carmyerius dollfusi isolate, a member of the Gastrothylacidae sub-family; and seven Calicophoron microbothrium isolates belonging to the Paramphistomidae sub-family. ITS2 sequence analysis using BlastN results indicated that this is the first report of S. compactus (KP639630) and C. dollfusi (KP639636). Phylogenetic reconstruction of the paramphistome isolates revealed three separate clades representing the three species. However, the clade with all the C. microbothrium isolates was the only one that was supported by a higher bootstrap value of 92%, although there was no differentiation of the isolates according to geographical locations. The low divergence values on the ITS2 sequences of the C. microbothrium isolates indicate that ITS rDNA sequences can be used as a molecular tool to infer knowledge for resolving taxonomic groupings.

Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bian, Q.Q., Zhao, G.H., Jia, Y.Q., Fang, Y.Q., Cheng, W.Y., Du, S.Z., Ma, X.T. & Lin, Q. (2013) Characterisation of Dicrocoelium dendriticum isolates from small ruminants in Shaanxi Province, north-western China, using internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Journal of Helminthology 26, 16.Google Scholar
Dinnik, J.A. & Dinnik, N.N. (1954) The lifecycle of Paramphistomum microbothrium . Parasitology 54, 285299.Google Scholar
Dube, S. & Tizauone, M. (2014) Paramphistomes in Matebeleland South Province Zimbabwe and their effect on aspects of blood plasma composition in infected cattle. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 7, 133138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dube, S., Siwela, A.H., Dube, C. & Masanganise, K.E. (2002) Prevalence of paramphistomes in Mashonaland West, Central and East, and Midlands Provinces, Zimbabwe. Acta Zoologica . Taiwanica 13, 3952.Google Scholar
Eduardo, S.L. (1982) The taxonomy of the family Paramphistomidae Fischoeder, 1901 with special reference to the morphology of species occurring in ruminants. Revision of the genus Paramphistomum Fischoeder, 1901. Systematic Parasitology 4, 189238.Google Scholar
Eduardo, S.L. (1983) The taxonomy of the family Paramphistoinidae Fischoeder, 1901 with special reference to the morphology of species occurring in ruminants. III. Revision of the genus Calicophoron Nasmark, 1937. Systematic Parasitology 5, 2579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eduardo, S.L. (1986) The taxonomy of the family Paramphistomidae Fishoeder, 1901 with special reference to the morphology of species occurring in ruminants. VIII. The genera Stephanopharynx Fischoeder, 1901 and Balanorchis Fischoeder, 1901. Systematic Parasitology 8, 5769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghatani, S., Shylla, J.A., Tandon, V., Chatterjee, A. & Roy, B. (2012) Molecular characterization of pouched amphistome parasites (Trematoda: Gastrothylacidae) using ribosomal ITS2 sequence and secondary structures. Journal of Helminthology 86, 117124.Google Scholar
Gretillat, S. (1964) Valeur taxonomique des caractères morphologiques et anatomiques du pore génital chez les Trématodes du genre Carmyerîus (Gastrothylacidae). Revue d'élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux 17, 421428.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, M., Kondoh, D., Bawn, S., Maw, N.N., Htun, L.L., Thein, M., Gyi, A., Sunn, K., Katakura, K. & Itagaki, T. (2013) Morphological and molecular characterization of Explanatum explanatum from cattle and buffaloes in Myanmar. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 75, 309314.Google Scholar
Jones, A. (2005) Family Stephanopharyngidae Stiles & Goldberger 1910. pp. 347348 in Jones, A., Bray, R.A. & Gibson, D.I. (Eds) Keys to the Trematoda, vol. 2. London, CABI Publishing and the Natural History Museum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotfy, W.M., Brant, S.V., Ashmawy, K.I., Devkota, R., Mkoji, G.M. & Loker, E.S. (2010) A molecular approach for identification of paramphistomes from Africa and Asia. Veterinary Parasitology 174, 234240.Google Scholar
Nasmark, K.E. (1937) A revision of the trematode family Paramphistomidae. Zoologiska bidrag från Uppsala 16, 301565.Google Scholar
Panyarachun, B., Ngamniyom, A., Sobhon, P. & Anuracpreeda, P. (2013) Morphology and histology of the adult Paramphistomum gracile Fischoeder, 1901. Journal of Veterinary Science 14, 425432.Google Scholar
Pfukenyi, D.M., Monrad, J. & Mukaratirwa, S. (2005) Epidemiology and control of trematode infections in cattle in Zimbabwe: A review. South African Veterinary Associates 76, 917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phiri, A.M., Chota, A. & Phiri, I.K. (2007) Seasonal pattern of bovine amphistomosis in traditionally reared cattle in the Kafue and Zambezi catchment areas of Zambia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 39, 97102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radwan, N., Khalil, A.I., Shafeey, H.E.A. & Wahdan, A.E. (2014) Integrative description of three species of paramphistomes using different techniques. Global Veterinaria 12, 803815.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, L., Perugini, A.G., Capuano, F., Fenizia, D., Musella, V., Veneziano, V. & Cringoli, G. (2005) Characterization of the second internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal DNA of Calicophoron daubneyi from various hosts and locations in southern Italy. Veterinary Parasitology 131, 247253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Round, M.C. (1968) Checklist of the helminth parasites of African mammals. pp. 819. London, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Sanabria, R., Moré, G. & Romero, J. (2011) Molecular characterization of the ITS-2 fragment of Paramphistomum leydeni (Trematoda: Paramphistomidae). Veterinary Parasitology 177, 182185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamura, K., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. (2004) Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101, 1103011035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipsi, A. & Kumar, S. (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30, 27252729.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson, T.J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22, 46734680.Google Scholar