No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
(H.) Dohm Mageiros: die Rolle des Kochs in der griechisch-römischen Komödie. (Zetemata, 32.) Munich: C. H. Beck. 1964. Pp. xv + 294. DM 38.
Review products
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2015
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS007542690008993X/resource/name/firstPage-S007542690008993Xa.jpg)
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1965
References
1 The fragments are Antiphanes, fr. 222; Sotades, 1; Euphron, 1; Anaxippus, 1; and Damoxenus, 2. In discussing the last of these (161 ff.), Dohm produces an unmetrical conjecture (v. 31, p. 174 and n. 1), and fails to note Alciphron, 3.19.8 (from comedy? cf. Meineke, , FCG 4.334 Google Scholar; Kock, , Rh. Mus. 43 [1888] 40 ff.Google Scholar) as a parallel for comic ridicule of the Epicurean term καταπύκνωσις (p. 165).
2 Though Dohm's references to ‘Pythodicus’ in his Aulularia discussion now need altering: cf. Handley, E. W., Philol. 107 (1963) 316 f.Google Scholar