Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T20:52:32.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Byzantine Satire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Extract

It must sometimes have occurred to readers of Byzantine literature, after they have perused a number of the occasionally valuable, but almost always dreary, works of which it is composed —lifeless chronicles, polemical and other theology, inflated panegyrics, and grammatical treatises—to ask the question, whether this was really all; whether a quick-witted and intelligent people, such as we know the inhabitants of Constantinople at certain periods to have been, were contented to subsist entirely on such dry mental food. No doubt, religious controversy often ran high, and this, when it fills men's thoughts, is apt to supply the place of intellectual interests; but such discussions did not last for ever, and could not have occupied the minds of the whole of the educated population. A certain source of relief was provided in the numerous poems, songs, and romances in the popular language—some of native growth and dealing with subjects of local or traditional interest, some imitated from the romances of Western Europe—which have been brought to light by the industry of such men as MM. Sathas and Legrand at Paris, Prof. Lambros of Athens, and the late Dr. W. Wagner of Hamburg. But even these do not furnish that element of liveliness, which we should expect to manifest itself in some shape or other in a great centre of activity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1881

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 234 note 1 Comnena, Anna, Alexias, Book xiii, chap. i. p. 179, edit. Bonn.Google Scholar

page 238 note 1 De Luctu, ii.

page 239 note 1 Dialogi Mortuorum, xx. 4.

page 239 note 2 Ibid. xv. 2.

page 247 note 1 According to the ‘humoral pathology’ of Hippocrates, the four fluids or humours of the body were blood, phlegm, black bile and yellow bile.

page 248 note 1 Dial. Mort. xxvii. 1.

page 258 note 1 Ar. Ran. 156.

page 259 note 1 Lucian, , Cataplus, c. 24Google Scholar, cf. Plato, , Gorgias, p. 524 E.Google Scholar

page 263 note 1 Ellissen, , Analecten, vol. iv. part 1, p. 37.Google Scholar

page 264 note 1 See the passage quoted by M. Lambros in his pamphlet, p. 45.

page 263 note 2 Notices des Manuscrits, vol. ix. part 2, p. 136.

page 266 note 2 Vera Historia, ii. 3.

page 267 note 1 Plato, , Sympos. p. 202 E.Google Scholar

page 269 note 1 Lucian, , Cataplus, 28, 29.Google Scholar