Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T22:50:01.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Observation of “Ball Ice”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

Fritz Loewe*
Affiliation:
Melbourne University, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1949

A peculiar type of ice formation of which no description has been found in the more easily accessible literature was observed in Antarctic waters (66° S., 152° E.) on 25 February 1948 during the cruise of the Wyatt Earp of the Australian National Antarctic Research Expedition. The temperature of the water surface was 29° F. (−1.7° C.), that of the air 25° F. (−3.9° C.), wind Beaufort 2. As shown in the photograph (Fig. 5, p. 316) numerous spheres of a diameter of one to two inches (2.5 to 5.0 cm.) were found floating in the sea. The balls were very soft and spongy; no internal structure could be clearly distinguished. They were generally arranged in “streams” in the same way as the slush that was simultaneously forming in many places.

Photograph: Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Information

Fig. 5 Ball Ice off King George VI Land, Antarctica (see p. 340)

The ball ice may possibly have originated from the coalescence of frazil ice particles and their subsequent rounding off by wave action and collision with other particles. Or they may be remnants of small pancakes worn down by the same process. This explanation is suggested by the association of the balls with slush and incipient pancake ice, but it appears nevertheless unlikely because no transition between the flat pancakes and the balls was observed. Another explanation is that snowflakes, which fell into the water, did not melt but were able to continue floating at the surface. The movement of the water brought them into contact with each other so that they stuck together, the agglomerate becoming rounded by water movements and the impact of other solid particles. This second explanation becomes more likely as snowflakes had actually been falling for some time before the observation. It would be interesting to know whether similar “ball ice” has been observed elsewhere and whether a more likely theory of its formation can be suggested.

Figure 0

Fig. 5 Ball Ice off King George VI Land, Antarctica (see p. 340)

Photograph: Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Information