Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T03:33:23.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vortex dynamics in a shearing zonal flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Philip S. Marcus
Philip S. Marcus
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When vortices are embedded in a shearing zonal flow their interactions are changed qualitatively. If the zonal flow's shear and the vortex's strength are of the same order and opposite sign, the vortex is pulled into a thin spiral, fragments, and is destroyed in a turn-around time. If the signs are the same, the vortex redistributes its vorticity so that its maximum value is at the centre, and its shape is determined by the ratio of its vorticity to the shear of the surrounding zonal flow. The dynamics depends crucially on the exchange between the self-energy of the vortices and the interaction energy of the zonal flow with the vortices. A numerical example that shows all of these effects is the breakup of a vortex layer: either a single large vortex is formed or successively smaller and more numerous thin filaments of vorticity are created. Two stable vortices are shown to merge if their initial separation in the cross-zonal direction is smaller than a critical distance which is approximately equal the vortices’ radii. The motions of large vortices are constrained by conservation laws, but when the zonal flow is filled with small-scale filaments of vorticity, the large vortices exchange energy with the filaments so that they are no longer constrained by these laws, and their dynamics become richer. Energy is shown to flow from the large vortices to the filaments, and this observation is used to predict the strength of boundary layers and the critical separation distance for vortex merging.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 215 , June 1990 , pp. 393 - 430
Copyright
© 1990 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benzi, R., Patarnello, S. & Santngelo, P. 1987 On the statistical properties of two-dimensional decaying turbulence. Europhys. Lett. 3, 811–818.Google Scholar
Buttke, T. F. 1990 The observation of singularities in the boundary of patches of constant vorticity. Phys. Fluids (to appear).Google Scholar
Dowling, T. E. & Ingersoll, A. P. 1989 Jupiter's Great Red Spot as a shallow-water system. J. Atmos. Sci. 46, 3256–3278.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1985 The stability and energetics of corotating uniform vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 157, 95–134.Google Scholar
Flierl, G. R., Stern, M. E. & Whitehead, J. A. 1983 The physical significance of modons. Laboratory experiments and general integral constraints. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 7, 233–263.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Marcus, P. S. 1984a Simulation of Taylor—Couette flow. Part 1. Numerical methods and comparison with experiment. J. Fluid Mech. 146, 45–64.Google Scholar
Marcus, P. S. 1984b Simulation of Taylor—Couette flow. Part 2. Numerical results for wavy-vortex flow with one travelling wave. J. Fluid Mech. 146, 65–113.Google Scholar
Marcus, P. S. 1986 Numerical simulations of quasi-geostrophic flow using vortex and spectral methods. In Numerical Analysis (ed. D. F. Griffiths & G. A. Watson), pp. 125–139. Longman.
Marcus, P. S. 1987 Spatial self-organization of vortices in chaotic shearing flows. Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 2, 127–138.Google Scholar
Marcus, P. S. 1988 Numerical simulations of Jupiter's Great Red Spot. Nature 331, 693–696.Google Scholar
Marcus, P. S. & Van Buskirk, R. 1990 Comment on ‘Jupiter's Red Spot as a shallow-water system’. J. Atmos. Sci. (to appear).Google Scholar
Maxworthy, T. & Redekopp, L. G. 1976 A solitary wave theory of the Great Red Spot and other observed features in the Jovian atmosphere. Icarus 29, 261–271.Google Scholar
Melander, M. V., Styczek, A. S. & Zabusky, N. J. 1984 Elliptically desingularized vortex model for the two-dimensional Euler equations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1222–1225.Google Scholar
Moore, D. W. & Saffman, P. G. 1971 Structure of a line vortex in an imposed strain. In Aircraft Wake Turbulence (ed. J. H. Olsen, A. Goldburg & M. Rogers), pp. 339–354. Plenum.
Nielsen, J. E. & Schoberl, M. R. 1984 A numerical simulation of barotropic instability. Part II: Wave—wave interaction. J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 2869–2881.Google Scholar
Orszag, S. A. 1974 Fourier series on spheres. Mon. Weath. Rev. 102, 56–75.Google Scholar
Overman, E. A. & Zabusky, N. J. 1982 Evolution and merger of isolated vortex structures. Phys. Fluids 25, 1297–1305.Google Scholar
Rhines, P. B. & Young, W. R. 1982 Homogenization of potential vorticity in planetary gyres. J. Fluid Mech. 122, 347–367.Google Scholar
Sommeria, J., Meyers, S. D. & Swinney, H. L. 1988 Laboratory simulation of Jupiter's Great Red Spot. Nature 331, 689–693.Google Scholar
Van Buskirk, R. D. & Marcus, P. S. 1990 Contour methods for vortices in shearing zonal flows. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc.Google Scholar