Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T08:25:51.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Velocity and velocity gradient based properties of a turbulent plane mixing layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2012

Richard B. Loucks  and
James M. Wallace
Richard B. Loucks
Affiliation:
RTI Group LLC, 910 Bestgate Road, Annapolis, MD 21401-3048, USA
James M. Wallace*
Affiliation:
Burgers Program for Fluid Dynamics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: wallace@umd.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were carried out in a turbulent mixing layer designed to match, as closely as possible, the conditions of the temporally evolving direct numerical simulation of Rogers & Moser (Phys. Fluids, vol. 6, 1994, pp. 903–922). Two Reynolds numbers, based on the local momentum thickness in the self-similar region of the mixing layer, were investigated: and . Measurements were also made in the mixing layer in the pre-mixing transition region where . The three velocity components and their cross-stream gradients were measured with a small 12-sensor hot-wire probe that traversed the mixing layer. Taylor’s hypothesis was used to estimate the streamwise gradients of the velocity components so that reasonably good approximations of all the components of the velocity gradient tensor would be available. The signal from a single-sensor probe at a fixed position in the high-speed free stream flow provided a reference to the phases of the passage of large-scale, coherent, spanwise-oriented vortices past the 12-sensor probe. The velocity and velocity gradient data were analysed to determine turbulence statistical characteristics, including moments, probability density functions and one-dimensional spectra of the velocity and vorticity fields. Although the velocity statistics obtained from the experiment agree well with those from the direct numerical simulation of Rogers & Moser, there are significant differences in the vorticity statistics. The phase reference from the fixed single-sensor probe permitted phase averaging of the 12-sensor probe data so that the spanwise ‘roller’ vortices could be separated from the small-scale, more random turbulence, as had been previously demonstrated by Hussain & Zaman (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 159, 1985, pp. 85–104). In this manner, the data could be conditionally averaged to examine the spatial distributions, with respect to the roller vortices, of interesting and important characteristics of the turbulence, such as the turbulent kinetic energy production and dissipation rate, enstrophy and vorticity component covariances.

JFM classification

Turbulent Flows: Shear layer turbulence
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 699 , 25 May 2012 , pp. 280 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ashurst, W. T. & Meiburg, E. 1988 Three-dimensional shear layers via vortex dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 189, 87–116.Google Scholar
2. Attili, A. & Bisetti, F. 2011 Statistics and scaling of turbulence in a spatially developing shear layer. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 56 (18), 208.Google Scholar
3. Balaras, E., Piomelli, U. & Wallace, J. M. 2001 Self-similar states in turbulent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 446, 1–24.Google Scholar
4. Balint, J.-L., Wallace, J. M. & Vukoslavčević, P. 1989 The statistical properties of the vorticity field of a two-stream turbulent mixing layer. In Advances in Turbulence (ed. Fernholz, H. H. & Fiedler, H. E. ), vol. 2, pp. 74–78. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Batt, R. G. 1977 Turbulent mixing of passive and chemically reacting species in a low-speed shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 82, 53–95.Google Scholar
6. Bell, J. H. & Mehta, R. D. 1990 Development of a two-stream mixing layer from tripped and untripped boundary layers. AIAA J. 28, 2034–2042.Google Scholar
7. Bell, J. H., Plesniak, M. W. & Mehta, R. D 1992 Spanwise averaging of plane mixing layer properties. AIAA J. 30, 835–836.Google Scholar
8. Bernal, L. P. & Roshko, A. 1986 Streamwise vortex structure in plane mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 170, 499–525.Google Scholar
9. Bernard, P. S. 2008 Grid-free simulation of the spatially growing turbulent mixing layer. AIAA J. 46, 1725–1737.Google Scholar
10. Bradshaw, P. 1966 The effect of initial conditions on the development of a free shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 26, 225–236.Google Scholar
11. Breidenthal, R. 1981 Structure in turbulent mixing layers and wakes using a chemical reaction. J. Fluid Mech. 109, 1–24.Google Scholar
12. Browand, F. K. & Latigo, B. O. 1978 Growth of the two-dimensional mixing layer from a turbulent and nonturbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 22, 1011–1019.Google Scholar
13. Browand, F. K. & Troutt, T. T. 1980 A note on spanwise structure in the two-dimensional mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 97, 771–781.Google Scholar
14. Brown, G. L. & Roshko, A. 1974 On density effects and large structure in the turbulent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 775–816.Google Scholar
15. de Bruin, I. 2001 Direct and large-eddy simulation of the spatially developing turbulent mixing layer. PhD Dissertation, University of Twente.Google Scholar
16. Chandrsuda, A., Mehta, R. D., Weir, A. D. & Bradshaw, P. 1978 Effect of free stream turbulence on large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 85, 693–704.Google Scholar
17. Comte, P., Silvestrini, J. H. & Bégou, P. 1998 Streamwise vortices in large-eddy simulations of mixing layers. Eur. J. Mech. (B/Fluids) 17, 615–637.Google Scholar
18. Corcos, G. M. & Lin, S. J. 1984 The mixing layer: deterministic models of a turbulent flow. Part 2. The origin of the three-dimensional motion. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 67–95.Google Scholar
19. Corcos, G. M. & Sherman, F. S. 1984 The mixing layer: deterministic models of a turbulent flow. Part 1. Introduction and the two-dimensional flow. J. Fluid Mech. 11, 162–185.Google Scholar
20. Cortesi, A. B., Smith, B. L., Yadigaroglu, G. & Banerjee, S. 1999 Numerical investigation of the entrainment and mixing processes in neutral and stably-stratified mixing layers. Phys. Fluids 139, 29–65.Google Scholar
21. Dimotakis, P. E. & Brown, G. L. 1976 The mixing layer at high Reynolds number: large-structure dynamics and entrainment. J. Fluid Mech. 78, 535–560.Google Scholar
22. Folz, A. & Wallace, J. M 2010 Near-surface turbulence in the atmospheric boundary layer. Physica D 239, 1305–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Foss, J. F. & Haw, R. C. 1994 Vorticity and velocity measurements in a 2:1 mixing layer. In Forum of Turbulent Flows, ASME Fluids Engineering Division, vol. 174 (ed. Bowers, W. W., Morris, M. J. & Samimy, M. ), pp. 115–120. ASME.Google Scholar
24. Ghoniem, A. F. & Heidarinejad, G. 1991 Effect of Damkohler number on the reactive zone structure in a shear layer. Combust. Flame 83, 1–16.Google Scholar
25. Hernan, M. A. & Jiménez, J. 1982 Computer analysis of a high-speed film of the plane mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 323–345.Google Scholar
26. Ho, C.-M. & Huang, L.-S. 1982 Subharmonics and vortex merging in mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 443–473.Google Scholar
27. Huang, L.-S. & Ho, C.-M. 1990 Small-scale transition in a plane mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 210, 475–500.Google Scholar
28. Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1983 Coherent structures – reality and myth. Phys. Fluids 26, 2816–2850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Hussain, A. K. M. F. & Zaman, K. B. M. Q. 1985 An experimental study of organized motion in the turbulent plane mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 159, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Jacobs, P. A. & Pullin, D. I. 1989 Multiple-contour-dynamic simulation of eddy scales in the plane shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 199, 89–124.Google Scholar
31. Jiménez, J. 1983 A spanwise structure in the plane shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 132, 319–336.Google Scholar
32. Jiménez, J. & Moin, P. 1991 The minimal flow unit in near-wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 225, 213–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Jorgensen, F. E. 1971 Directional sensitivity of wire and fiber film probes. DISA Inform. 11, 31–37.Google Scholar
34. Kelly, R. E. 1967 On the stability of an inviscid shear layer which is periodic in space and time. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 657–689.Google Scholar
35. Kim, J.-H. 1989 Wirbelsträkemessungen in einer turbulenten Scherschicht. PhD Dissertation, Physikalische Ingenieurwissenschaften der Technischen Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
36. Kim, J.-H. & Fiedler, H. R. 1988 Vorticity measurements in a turbulent mixing layer. In Advances in Turbulence 2-Proc. of the Second European Turbulence Conf., Berlin (ed. H. H. Fernholz & H. E. Fiedler) pp. 267–271.Google Scholar
37. Lang, D. B. 1985 Laser Doppler velocity and vorticity measurements in turbulent shear layers. PhD Dissertation, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
38. Lasheras, J. C., Cho, J. S. & Maxworthy, T. 1986 On the origin and evolution of streamwise vortical structures in a plane, free shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 172, 231–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Lasheras, J. C. & Choi, H. 1988 Three-dimensional instability of a plane, free shear layer: an experimental study on the formation and evolution of streamwise vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 189, 53–86.Google Scholar
40. Laizet, S., Lardeau, S. & Lamballais, E. 2010 Direct numerical simulation of a mixing layer downstream a thick splitter plate. Phys. Fluids 22, 015104.Google Scholar
41. Li, N., Balaras, E. & Wallace, J. M. 2010 Passive scalar transport in a turbulent mixing layer. Flow Turbul. Combust. 85, 1–24.Google Scholar
42. Loucks, R. B. 1998 An experimental examination of the velocity and vorticity fields in a plane mixing layer. PhD Dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
43. Marasli, B., Nguyen, P. & Wallace, J. M. 1993 A calibration technique for multiple-sensor hot-wire probes and its application to vorticity measurements in the wake of a circular cylinder. Exp. Fluids 15, 209–218.Google Scholar
44. Metcalfe, R. W., Hussain, A. K. M. F., Menon, S. & Hayakawa, M. 1987a Coherent structures in a turbulent mixing layer: a comparison between direct numerical simulation and experiments. In Turbulent Shear Flows, vol. 5 (ed. Durst, F., Launder, B. E., Lumley, J. L., Schmidt, F. W. & Whitelaw, J. H. ), pp. 110–123. Springer.Google Scholar
45. Metcalfe, R. W., Orszag, S. A., Brachet, M. E., Menon, S. & Riley, J. J. 1987b Secondary instability of a temporally growing mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 184, 207–243.Google Scholar
46. Miksad, R. W. 1972 Experiments on the nonlinear stages of free-shear layer transition. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 695–719.Google Scholar
47. Moser, R. D. & Rogers, M. M. 1991 Mixing transition and the cascade to small scales in a plane mixing layer. Phys. Fluids 3, 1128–1134.Google Scholar
48. Moser, R. D. & Rogers, M. M. 1992 Coherent structures in a simulated turbulent mixing layer. In IUTAM Symp. on Eddy Structure Identification (ed. Bonnet, J. P. & Glauser, M. N. ). Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
49. Moser, R. D. & Rogers, M. M. 1993 The three-dimensional evolution of a plane mixing layer: pairing and transition to turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 247, 275–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50. Ong, L. & Wallace, J. M. 1998 Joint probability density analysis of the structure and dynamics of the vorticity field of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 367, 291–328.Google Scholar
51. Patnaik, R. T., Sherman, F. S. & Corcos, G. M. 1976 Direct simulation of a self-similar turbulent mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 73, 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52. Pierrehumbert, R. T. & Widnall, S. E. 1982 The two- and three-dimensional instabilities of a spatially periodic shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 114, 59–82.Google Scholar
53. Piomelli, U., Balint, J.-L. & Wallace, J. M. 1989 On the validity of Taylor’s hypothesis for wall-bounded turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids A 1, 609–611.Google Scholar
54. Riley, J. J. & Metcalfe, R. W. 1980 Direct numerical simulation of a perturbed turbulent mixing layer. AIAA Paper 80-0274.Google Scholar
55. Rogers, M. M. & Moser, R. D. 1992 The three-dimensional evolution of a plane mixing layer: the Kelvin–Helmoltz roll-up. J. Fluid Mech. 243, 183–226.Google Scholar
56. Rogers, M. M. & Moser, R. D. 1994 Direct simulation of a self-similar turbulent mixing layer. Phys. Fluids 6, 903–922.Google Scholar
57. Spalart, P. R. 1988 Direct simulation of a turbulent boundary layer up to . J. Fluid Mech. 187, 61–98.Google Scholar
58. Subramanian, C. S., Rajagopalan, S., Antonia, R. A. & Chambers, A. J. 1982 Comparison of conditional averaging techniques in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 123, 335–362.Google Scholar
59. Taylor, G. I. 1938 Production and dissipation of vorticity in a turbulent fluid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 164, 15–23.Google Scholar
60. Vukoslavčević, P. V., Beratlis, N., Balaras, E., Wallace, J. M. & Sun, O. 2008 On the spatial resolution of velocity and velocity gradient-based turbulence statistics measured with multi-sensor hot-wire probes. Exp. Fluids 46, 109–119.Google Scholar
61. Vukoslavčević, P. V. & Petrović, D. V. 2000 Multiple Hot-Wire Probes: Measurements of Turbulent Velocity and Vorticity Fields. Montenegrin Academy of Sciences and Arts.Google Scholar
62. Vukoslavčević, P. & Wallace, J. M. 1996 A 12-sensor hot-wire probe to measure the velocity and vorticity vectors in turbulent flow. Meas. Sci. Technol. 7, 1451–1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63. Vukoslavčević, P., Wallace, J. M. & Balint, J.-L. 1991 The velocity and vorticity fields of a turbulent boundary layer. Part 1. Simultaneous measurement by hot-wire anemometry. J. Fluid Mech. 228, 25–51.Google Scholar
64. Wallace, J. M. 2009 Twenty years of experimental and DNS access to the velocity gradient tensor: what have we learned about turbulence? Phys. Fluids 21, 021301.Google Scholar
65. Wallace, J. M., Eckelmann, H. & Brodkey, R. S. 1972 The wall region in turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 39–48.Google Scholar
66. Wallace, J. M. & Foss, J. F. 1994 The measurement of vorticity in turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 27, 469–514.Google Scholar
67. Wallace, J. M. & Vukoslavčević, P. V. 2010 Measurement of the velocity gradient tensor in turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 157–180.Google Scholar
68. Wang, Y., Tanahashia, M. & Miyauchi, T. 2007 Coherent fine scale eddies in turbulence transition of spatially-developing mixing layer. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 28, 1280–1290.Google Scholar
69. Winant, C. D. & Browand, F. K. 1974 Vortex pairing: the mechanism of turbulent mixing-layer growth at moderate Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 237–255.Google Scholar
70. Wygnanski, I. & Fiedler, H. E. 1970 The two-dimensional mixing region. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 327–361.Google Scholar