Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T02:28:54.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variational treatment of inertia–gravity waves interacting with a quasi-geostrophic mean flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2016

Rick Salmon*
Affiliation:
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0213, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: rsalmon@ucsd.edu

Abstract

The equations for three-dimensional hydrostatic Boussinesq dynamics are equivalent to a variational principle that is closely analogous to the variational principle for classical electrodynamics. Inertia–gravity waves are analogous to electromagnetic waves, and available potential vorticity (i.e. the amount by which the potential vorticity exceeds the potential vorticity of the rest state) is analogous to electric charge. The Lagrangian can be expressed as the sum of three parts. The first part corresponds to quasi-geostrophic dynamics in the absence of inertia–gravity waves. The second part corresponds to inertia–gravity waves in the absence of quasi-geostrophic flow. The third part represents a coupling between the inertia–gravity waves and quasi-geostrophic motion. This formulation provides the basis for a general theory of inertia–gravity waves interacting with a quasi-geostrophic mean flow.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bretherton, F. P. 1969 On the mean motion induced by internal gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 36, 785803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, O. & McIntyre, M. E. 1998 On non-dissipative wave–mean interactions in the atmosphere or oceans. J. Fluid Mech. 354, 301343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, O. & McIntyre, M. E. 2003 Remote recoil: a new wave–mean interaction effect. J. Fluid Mech. 492, 207230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, O. & McIntyre, M. E. 2005 Wave capture and wave–vortex duality. J. Fluid Mech. 534, 6795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1975 The Classical Theory of Fields. Pergamon.Google Scholar
McIntyre, M. E. & Norton, W. A. 2000 Potential vorticity inversion on a hemisphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 57, 12141235.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, R. 1998 Lectures on Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, R. 2014 Analogous formulation of electrodynamics and two-dimensional fluid dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 761, R2, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, G. L. & Young, W. R. 2015 Available potential vorticity and wave-averaged quasi-geostrophic flow. J. Fluid Mech. 785, 401424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, J. A. & Feynman, R. P. 1949 Classical electrodynamics in terms of direct interparticle action. Rev. Mod. Phys. 21 (3), 425433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1965 A general approach to linear and nonlinear waves using a Lagrangian. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 273283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1974 Linear and Nonlinear Waves. Wiley.Google Scholar
Xie, J.-H. & Vanneste, J. 2015 A generalized-Lagrangian-mean model of the interactions between near-inertial waves and mean flow. J. Fluid Mech. 774, 143169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, W. R. 2012 An exact thickness-weighted average formulation of the Boussinesq equations. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 42, 692707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, W. R. & Ben Jelloul, M. 1997 Propagation of near-inertial oscillations through a geostrophic flow. J. Mar. Res. 55, 735766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar