Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:39:28.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Turbulent hydraulic jumps in a stratified shear flow. Part 2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2014

S. A. Thorpe*
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Anglesey LL59 5AB, UK
Lin Li
Affiliation:
College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
*
Present address: 1A, Green Edge, Beaumaris, Anglesey LL58 8BY, UK. Email address for correspondence: oss413@bangor.ac.uk

Abstract

Conditions are found in which stationary turbulent hydraulic jumps can occur in a shallow stably stratified shear flow of depth $\def \xmlpi #1{}\def \mathsfbi #1{\boldsymbol {\mathsf {#1}}}\let \le =\leqslant \let \leq =\leqslant \let \ge =\geqslant \let \geq =\geqslant \def \Pr {\mathit {Pr}}\def \Fr {\mathit {Fr}}\def \Rey {\mathit {Re}}h_{1}$ moving over a rigid horizontal boundary at $z =0$ and below a deep static layer of uniform density. The flow approaching a jump has uniform density and speed to a height $z = h_{1}\eta _{1}\ (\eta _{1} \le 1)$. Above this, in an interfacial layer $h_{1}\eta _{1}<z<h_{1}$, the density and speed decrease linearly to their values in a deep uniform and static layer above $z = h_{1}$. The flow downstream of a jump is supposed to be similarly stratified to a height $ h_{2}$, but with a lower layer of height $h_{2}\eta _{2}$. The flow approaching the jump is specified by $\eta _{1}$ and by a Froude number, Fr. Stationary jumps occur in the flow only if Fr is large enough to ensure that no internal waves can propagate upstream from the transition region. The flow downstream of the jump satisfies conditions of conservation of mass, volume and momentum fluxes, and closure is obtained by the selection of its gradient Richardson number, ${\mathit{Ri}}_{F}$. It is necessary that $\eta _{1} \ge \eta _{2}$ for the entrainment of fluid into the moving layer from the overlying deep layer to be non-negative. The jump height, $q = h_{2}/h_{1}$, always exceeds unity (i.e. jumps are, overall, of elevation) and the mean thickness of the flowing layer, $h_{i}(1+ \eta _{i})/2\ (i = 1, 2)$, increases through the jump. There are two types of jumps, one in which the thickness of the lower layer, $h_{i}\eta _{i}$, increases (and all isopycnals are raised by the transition) and a second in which $h_{i}\eta _{i}$ decreases even though $q$ and the mean thickness ratio, $h_{2}(1+ \eta _{2})/ h_{1}(1 + \eta _{1})$, are greater than one. Two possible solutions for the downstream flow (i.e. two jumps of different heights, $q$, and different shape parameters, $\eta _{2}$) are possible in limited ranges of Fr depending on $\eta _{1}$ when $\eta _{1} > \eta _{2}$, $= \eta _{2max}$, where $\eta _{2max} =0.744$ when ${\mathit{Ri}}_{F} = 1/3$. Only single solutions are possible for upstream flows with $\eta _{1}< \eta _{2max}$. The two branches of the double solutions are distinguishable. For the ‘upper’ solutions, $\eta _{2}$ increases as Fr increases, and all isopycnals are raised in the jump. The ‘lower’ of the double solutions are continuous with the single solutions (with $\eta _{1}<\eta _{2max}$), $\eta _{2}$ decreases as Fr increases, and for most of the jumps the lower uniform layer decreases in thickness through the jump. For all solutions there is a reduction in the energy flux as fluid passes through a transition, and hence a loss of energy in the turbulent mixing of a jump, as required on physical grounds. The Osborn efficiency factor, $\varGamma $, is generally less than the canonical value of 0.2 for upper branch solutions but greater than 0.2 for the single and lower branch solutions. A loss in vorticity flux occurs in a turbulent jump. For a hydraulic jump to be possible when $\eta _{2}$ is less than approximately 0.3, it is not generally necessary that the flow approaching a jump is unstable to Kelvin–Helmholtz (K–H) instability, but it is more common that upstream flows in which jumps can occur are dynamically unstable.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1965 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Alford, M. H., Girton, J. B., Voet, G., Carter, G. S., Mickett, J. B. & Klymak, J. M. 2013 Turbulent mixing and hydraulic control of abyssal water in the Samoan Passage. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 46684674.Google Scholar
Armi, L. & Mayr, G. J. 2011 The descending stratified flow and internal hydraulic jump in the lee of the Sierras. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 50, 19952011.Google Scholar
Baines, P. G. 1995 Topographic Effects in Stratified Flows. p. 482. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, M. E., Ivey, G. N., Winters, K. N. & Imberger, J. 2001 Measurements of diapycal diffusivities in stratified fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 442, 267291.Google Scholar
Borden, Z., Koblitz, T. & Meiburg, E. 2012 Turbulent mixing and wave radiation in non-Boussinesq internal bores. Phys. Fluids 24, 082106-1–17.Google Scholar
Borden, Z. & Meiburg, E. 2013 Circulation-based models for Boussinesq internal bores. J. Fluid Mech. 726, R1; doi:10.1017/jfm.2013.239.Google Scholar
Brandt, P., Alpers, W. & Backhaus, J. 1996 Study of the generation and propagation of internal waves in the Strait of Gibraltar using a numerical model and synthetic aperture radar images of the European ERS1 satellite. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 14237–14242.Google Scholar
Britter, R. E. & Simpson, J. E. 1978 Experiments on the dynamics of a gravity current head. J. Fluid Mech. 88, 223240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caulfield, C. & Peltier, W. 2000 Anatomy of the mixing transition in homogeneous and stratified free shear layers. J. Fluid Mech. 413, 147.Google Scholar
Cummins, P. F., Armi, L. & Vagle, S. 2006 Upstream internal hydraulic jumps. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 36, 753769.Google Scholar
Davis, K. A. & Monismith, S. G. 2011 The modification of bottom boundary layer turbulence and mixing by internal waves shoaling on a barrier reef. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 41, 22232241.Google Scholar
Gregg, M. C. & Pratt, L. J. 2010 Flow and hydraulics near the sill of Hood Canal, a strongly sheared, continuously stratified fjord. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40, 10871105.Google Scholar
Ivey, G. N., Winters, K. B. & Koseff, J. R. 2008 Density stratification, turbulence, but how much mixing? Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 169184.Google Scholar
Kunze, E. L. 2009 Vortical modes. In Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences, 2nd edn, vol. 6, pp. 285290. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1967 Internal waves in a continuously stratified atmosphere or ocean. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 305310.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. & Howard, L. N. 1964 Note on a heterogeneous shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 20, 331336.Google Scholar
Osborn, T. R. 1980 Estimates of the local rate of vertical diffusion from dissipation measurements. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 10, 8389.Google Scholar
Shih, L. H., Koseff, J. R., Ivey, G. N. & Ferziger, J. H. 2005 Parameterization of turbulent fluxes and scales using homogeneous sheared stably stratified turbulence simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 525, 193214.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. E. 1997 Gravity Currents in the Environment and the Laboratory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smyth, W. D. 2003 Secondary Kelvin–Helmholtz instability in weakly stratified shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 497, 6798.Google Scholar
Smyth, W. D. & Moum, J. N. 2000 Length scales of turbulence in stably stratified mixing layers. Phys. Fluids 12, 13271342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, W. D., Moum, J. N. & Caldwell, D. R. 2001 The efficiency of mixing in turbulent patches: inferences from direct simulations and microstructure observations. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 31, 19691992.Google Scholar
St Laurent, L. C. & Thurnherr, A. M. 2007 Intense mixing of lower thermocline water on the crest of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Nature 448, 680684.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 1973 Experiments on instability and turbulence in a stratified shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 61, 731751.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 2005 The Turbulent Ocean. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 2010 Turbulent hydraulic jumps in a stratified shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 654, 305350 (referred to as T1).Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. A., Smyth, W. D. & Lin, L. I. 2013 The effect of small viscosity and diffusivity on the marginal stability of stably stratified shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 731, 461476.Google Scholar
Wesson, J. C. & Gregg, M. C. 1988 Turbulent dissipation in the Strait of Gibraltar and associated mixing. In Small-Scale Turbulence and Mixing in the Ocean (ed. Nihoul, J. C. J. & Jamart, B. M.), Elsevier Oceanography Series, pp. 201212. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wolk, F. & Lueck, R. G. 2001 Heat flux and mixing efficiency in the surface mixing layer. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (C9), 19547–19562.Google Scholar