Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T01:26:24.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Topological constraints associated with fast dynamo action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

H. K. Moffatt  and
M. R. E. Proctor
H. K. Moffatt
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Silver Street. Cambridge
M. R. E. Proctor
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Silver Street. Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The conjecture of Vainshtein & Zel'dovich (1972) concerning the existence of a fast dynamo (i.e. one whose growth rate is independent of magnetic diffusivity η in the limit η → 0) is discussed with particular reference to (i) the stretch–twist–fold cycle which can double the strength of a magnetic flux tube, and (ii) the space-periodic Beltrami flow of maximal helicity, which has been shown to be capable of space-periodic dynamo action with the same period as the velocity field, by Arnold & Korkina (1983) and by Galloway & Frisch (1984). The topological constraint associated with conservation of magnetic helicity is shown to preclude fast dynamo action unless the scale of the magnetic field is almost everywhere of order η½ as η → 0; in this case, the field structure is severely singular in the limit. A steady incompressible velocity field, quadratic in the space variables, is shown to mimic the action of the stretch–twist–fold cycle, and is proposed as a plausible candidate for fast dynamo action.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 154 , May 1985 , pp. 493 - 507
Copyright
© 1985 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, V. I. 1965 Sur la topologie des écoulements stationnaires des fluides parfaits. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 261, 17–20.Google Scholar
Arnold, V. I. 1974 The asymptotic Hopf invariant and its applications (in Russian). In Proc. Summer School in Differential Equations, Erevan 1974. Armenian SSR Acad. Sci.
Arnold, V. I. & Korkina, E. I. 1983 The growth of a magnetic field in a three-dimensional steady incompressible flow (in Russian). Vest. Mosk. Un. Ta. Ser. 1, Mat. Mec. 3, 43–46.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1959 Small-scale variations of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid. Part 1. General discussion and the case of small conductivity. J. Fluid Mech. 5, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, M. A. & Field, G. B. 1984 The topological properties of magnetic helicity. J. Fluid Mech. 147, 133–148.Google Scholar
Boothby, W. M. 1975 An Introduction to Differentiale Manifolds and Riemannian Geometry. Academic.
Childress, S. 1970 New solutions of the kinematic dynamo problem. J. Math. Phys. 11, 3063–3076.Google Scholar
Dillon, R. F. 1974 Gravity and magnetic field correlation and related geomagnetic topics, chap. 6. Ph.D. thesis. Cambridge University.
Galloway, D. & Frisch, U. 1984 A numerical investigation of magnetic field generation in a flow with chaotic streamlines. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 29, 13–18.Google Scholar
Hénon, M. 1966 Sur la topologie des lignes de courant dans un cas particulier. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 262, 312–314.Google Scholar
Ince, E. L. 1925 Ordinary Differential Equations. Dover.
Malkus, W. V. R. & Proctor, M. R. E. 1975 The macrodynamics of α-effect dynamos in rotating fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 417–444.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1972 An approach to a dynamic theory of dynamo action in a rotating conducting fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 53, 385–399.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1969 The degree of knottedness of tangled vortex lines. J. Fluid Mech. 35, 117–129.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1978 Generation of Magnetic Fields in Electrically Conducting Fluids. Cambridge University Press.
Parker, E. N. 1955 The formation of sunspots from the solar toroidal field. Astrophys. J. 121, 491–507.Google Scholar
Roberts, G. O. 1970 Spatially periodic dynamos. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 266, 535–558.Google Scholar
Steenbeck, M., Krause, F. & Rädler, K.-H. 1966 A calculation of the mean electromotive force in an electrically conducting fluid in turbulent motion under the influence of Coriolis forces (in German). Z. Naturforsch. 21a, 369–376.Google Scholar
Vainshtein, S. I. & Zel'Dovich, Ya. B.1972 Origin of magnetic fields in astrophysics. Sov. Phys. Usp. 15, 159–172.Google Scholar
Woltjer, L. 1958 A theorem on force-free magnetic fields. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 44, 489–491.Google Scholar
Zel'Dovich, Ya. B., Molchanov, S. A., Ruzmaikin, A. A. & Sokoloff, D. D.1984 Kinematic dynamo problem in a linear velocity field. J. Fluid Mech. 144, 1–11.Google Scholar
Zel'Dovich, Ya. B. & Ruzmaikin, A. A.1980 The magnetic field in a conducting fluid in two-dimensional motion. Sov. Phys. JETP 51, 493–497.Google Scholar
Zel'Dovich, Ya. B., Ruzmaikin, A. A. & Sokoloff, D. D.1983 Magnetic Fields in Astrophysics. Gordon & Breach.