Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T20:31:37.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The thinning of lamellae in surfactant-free foams with non-Newtonian liquid phase

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2008

L. N. BRUSH  and
S. M. ROPER
L. N. BRUSH
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USAbrush@u.washington.edu
S. M. ROPER
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UKsroper@maths.gla.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thinning rates of liquid lamellae in surfactant-free non-Newtonian gas–liquid foams, appropriate for ceramic or polymer melts and also in metals near the melting point, are derived in two dimensions by matched asymptotic analysis valid at small capillary number. The liquid viscosity is modelled (i) as a power-law function of the shear rate and (ii) by the Ellis law. Equations governing gas–liquid interface dynamics and variations in liquid viscosity are derived within the lamellar, transition and plateau border regions of a corner of the liquid surrounding a gas bubble. The results show that the viscosity varies primarily in the very short transition region lying between the lamellar and the Plateau border regions where the shear rates can become very large. In contrast to a foam with Newtonian liquid, the matching condition which determines the rate of lamellar thinning is non-local. In all cases considered, calculated lamellar thinning rates exhibit an initial transient thinning regime, followed by a t−2 power-law thinning regime, similar to the behaviour seen in foams with Newtonian liquid phase. In semi-arid foam, in which the liquid fraction is O(1) in the small capillary number, results explicitly show that for both the power-law and Ellis-law model of viscosity, the thinning of lamella in non-Newtonian and Newtonian foams is governed by the same equation, from which scaling laws can be deduced. This result is consistent with recently published experimental results on forced foam drainage. However, in an arid foam, which has much smaller volume fraction of liquid resulting in an increase in the Plateau border radius of curvature as lamellar thinning progresses, the scaling law depends on the material and the thinning rate is not independent of the liquid viscosity model parameters. Calculations of thinning rates, viscosities, pressures, interface shapes and shear rates in the transition region are presented using data for real liquids from the literature. Although for shear-thinning fluids the power-law viscosity becomes infinite at the boundaries of the internal transition region where the shear rate is zero, the interface shape, the pressure and the internal shear rates calculated by both rheological models are indistinguishable.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 616 , 10 December 2008 , pp. 235 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banhart, J. 2001 Manufacture, characterization, and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Prog. Mater. Sci. 46, 559.Google Scholar
Bird, R. B., Armstrong, R. C. & Hassager, O. 1977 Dynamics of Polymeric Fluids, Vol. I – Fluid Mechanics. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Breward, C. J. W. 1999 The mathematics of foam. DPhil thesis. Oxford University.Google Scholar
Breward, C. J. W. & Howell, P. D. 2002 The drainage of a foam lamella. J. Fluid Mech. 458, 379–406.Google Scholar
Brush, L. N. & Davis, S. H. 2005 A new law of lamellar thinning in foam. J. Fluid Mech. 534, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erneux, E. & Davis, S. H. 1993 Nonlinear rupture of free films. Phys. Fluids A 5, 1117–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamdorf, M. & Johannsmann, D. 2000 Surface-rheological measurements on glass forming polymers based on the surface tension driven decay of imprinted corrugation gratings. J. Chem. Phys. 112, 4262–4270.Google Scholar
Howell, P. D. 1999 The draining of a two dimensional bubble. J. Engng Maths 35, 251–272.Google Scholar
Hrncir, E. & Rosin, J. 1997 Surface tension of blood. Physiol. Res. 46, 319–321.Google Scholar
Kevorkian, J. & Cole, J. D. 1985 Perturbation Methods in Applied Mathematics. Springer.Google Scholar
Myers, T. G. 2005 Application of non-Newtonian models to thin film flow. Phys. Rev. E 72, 066302.Google ScholarPubMed
Rosenblatt, S. & Davis, S. H. 1984 How do liquid drops spread on solids? In Frontiers in Fluid Mechanics (ed. Davis, S. H. & Lumley, J. L.), vol. 171. Springer.Google Scholar
Safouane, M., Saint-Jalmes, M., Bergeron, V. & Langevin, D. 2006 Viscosity effects in foam drainage: Newtonian and non-Newtonian foaming fluids. Eur. Phy. J. E 19, 195–202.Google ScholarPubMed
Scheffler, M., Gambaryan-Roisman, T., Zeschky, J., Scheffler, F. & Greil, P. 2002 Self-foamed cellular ceramics from solicone resins with a zeolite surface. Ceram. Engng Sci. Proc. 23, 203–210.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. & Narsimhan, G. 2006 Model for Plateau border drainage of power-law fluid with mobile interface and its application to foam drainage. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 300, 327–337.Google Scholar
Yang, C. C. & Nakae, H. 2003 The effects of viscosity and cooling conditions on the foamability of aluminum alloy. J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 141, 202–206.Google Scholar