Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:43:56.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The stabilizing effect of compressibility in turbulent shear flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

S. Sarkar
S. Sarkar
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Direct numerical simulation of turbulent homogeneous shear flow is performed in order to clarify compressibility effects on the turbulence growth in the flow. The two Mach numbers relevant to homogeneous shear flow are the turbulent Mach number Mt and the gradient Mach number Mg. Two series of simulations are performed where the initial values of Mg and Mt are increased separately. The growth rate of turbulent kinetic energy is observed to decrease in both series of simulations. This ‘stabilizing’ effect of compressibility on the turbulent energy growth rate is observed to be substantially larger in the DNS series where the initial value of Mg is changed. A systematic comparison of the different DNS cases shows that the compressibility effect of reduced turbulent energy growth rate is primarily due to the reduced level of turbulence production and not due to explicit dilatational effects. The reduced turbulence production is not a mean density effect since the mean density remains constant in compressible homogeneous shear flow. The stabilizing effect of compressibility on the turbulence growth is observed to increase with the gradient Mach number Mg in the homogeneous shear flow DNS. Estimates of Mg for the mixing layer and the boundary layer are obtained. These estimates show that the parameter Mg becomes much larger in the high-speed mixing layer relative to the high-speed boundary layer even though the mean flow Mach numbers are the same in the two flows. Therefore, the inhibition of turbulent energy production and consequent ‘stabilizing’ effect of compressibility on the turbulence (over and above that due to any mean density variation) is expected to be larger in the mixing layer relative to the boundary layer, in agreement with experimental observations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 282 , 10 January 1995 , pp. 163 - 186
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barre, S., Quine, C. & Dussauge, J. P. 1994 Compressibility effects on the structure of supersonic mixing layers: experimental results. J. Fluid Mech. 259, 47–78.Google Scholar
Blaisdell, G. A., Mansour, N. N. & Reynolds, W. C. 1993 Compressibility effects on the growth and structure of homogeneous turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 256, 443–485.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. 1977 Compressible turbulent shear layers. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 9, 33–54.Google Scholar
Cambon, C., Coleman, G. N. & Mansour, N. N. 1993 RDT and DNS of compressible homogeneous turbulence at finite Mach number. J. Fluid Mech. 257, 641–665.Google Scholar
Durbin, P. A. & Zeman, O. 1992 Rapid distortion theory for homogeneous compressed turbulence with application to modelling. J. Fluid Mech. 242, 349–370.Google Scholar
Elliott, G. S. & Samimy, M. 1990 Compressibility effects in free shear layers. Phys. Fluids A 2, 1231–1240.Google Scholar
Erlebacher, G., Hussaini, M. Y., Kreiss, H. O. & Sarkar, S. 1990 The analysis and simulation of compressible turbulence. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 2, 73–95.Google Scholar
Feiereisen, W. J., Shirani, E., Ferziger, J. H. & Reynolds, W. C. 1982 Direct simulation of homogeneous turbulent shear flows on the Illiac IV computer: applications to compressible and incompressible modelling. In Turbulent Shear Flows 3 (ed. L. J. S. Bradbury et al.) pp. 309–319.
Jackson, T. L. & Grosch, C. E. 1990 Absolute/convective instabilities and the convective Mach number in a compressible mixing layer. Phys. Fluids A 2, 949–954.Google Scholar
Jacquin, L., Cambon, C. & Blin, E. 1993 Turbulence amplification by a shock wave and rapid distortion theory. Phys. Fluids A 5, 2539–2550.Google Scholar
Kline, S. J., Cantwell, B. J. & Lilley, G. M. 1982 Proc. 1980–81 AFOSR-HTTM-Stanford Conf. on Complex Turbulent Flows, vol. 1, Stanford University Press.
Lee, M. J., Kim, J. & Moin, P. 1990 Structure of turbulence at high shear rate. J. Fluid Mech. 216, 561–583.Google Scholar
Lele, S. K. 1994 Compressibility effects on turbulence. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 26, 211–254.Google Scholar
Morris, P. J., Giridharan, M. G. & Lilley, G. M. 1990 On the turbulent mixing of compressible free shear layers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 431, 219–243.Google Scholar
Papamoschou, D. & Lele, S. K. 1993 Vortex-induced disturbance field in a compressible shear layer. Phys. Fluids A 5, 1412–1419.Google Scholar
Papamoschou, D. & Roshko, A. 1988 The compressible turbulent shear layer: an experimental study. J. Fluid Mech. 197, 453–477.Google Scholar
Ragab, S. A. & Wu, J. L. 1989 Linear instabilities in two-dimensional compressible mixing layers. Phys. Fluids A 1, 957–966.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. M., Moin, P. & Reynolds, W. C. 1987 The structure of the vorticity field in homogeneous turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 176, 33–66.Google Scholar
Sandham, N. D. & Reynolds, W. C. 1991 Three-dimensional simulations of large eddies in the compressible mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 224, 133–158.Google Scholar
Sarkar, S. 1992 The pressure-dilatation correlation in compressible flows. Phys. Fluids A 4, 2674–2682.Google Scholar
Sarkar, S., Erlebacher, G. & Hussaini, M. Y. 1991a Direct simulation of compressible turbulence in a shear flow. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 2, 291–305.Google Scholar
Sarkar, S., Erlebacher, G., Hussaini, M. Y. & Kreiss, H. O. 1991b The analysis and modelling of dilatational terms in compressible turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 227, 473–493.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. 1979 Boundary-Layer Theory, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill.
Speziale, C. G. 1991 Analytical methods for the development of Reynolds-stress closures in turbulence. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 107–157.Google Scholar
Tavoularis, S. & Karnik, U. 1989 Further experiments on the evolution of turbulent stresses and scales in uniformly sheared turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 204, 457–478.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1980 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
Wygnanski, I. & Fiedler, H. E. 1970 The two-dimensional mixing region. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 327–361.Google Scholar
Zeman, O. 1990 Dilatation dissipation - the concept and application in modelling compressible mixing layers. Phys. Fluids A 2, 178–188.Google Scholar