Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T04:57:40.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shear dispersion and anomalous diffusion by chaotic advection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

S. W. Jones  and
W. R. Young
S. W. Jones
Affiliation:
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA Present address: Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801–2935, USA
W. R. Young
Affiliation:
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The dispersion of passive scalars by the steady viscous flow through a twisted pipe is both a simple example of chaotic advection and an elaboration of Taylor's classic shear dispersion problem. In this article we study the statistics of the axial dispersion of both diffusive and perfect (non-diffusive) tracer in this system.

For diffusive tracer chaotic advection assists molecular diffusion in transverse mixing and so diminishes the axial dispersion below that of integrable advection. As in many other studies of shear dispersion the axial distribution ultimately becomes Gaussian as t → ∞. Thus there is a diffusive regime, but with an effective diffusivity that is enhanced above molecular values. In contrast to the classic case, the effective diffusivity is not necessarily inversely proportional to the molecular diffusivity. For instance, in the irregular regime the effective diffusivity is proportional to the logarithm of the molecular diffusivity.

For perfect tracer chaotic advection does not result in a diffusive process, even in the irregular regime in which streamlines wander throughout the cross-section of the pipe. Instead the variance of the axial position is proportional to t in t so that the measured diffusion coefficent diverges like In t. This faster than linear growth of variance is attributed to the trapping of tracer for long times near the solid boundary, where the no-slip condition ensures that the fluid moves slowly. Analogous logarithmic effects associated with the no-slip condition are well known in the context of porous media.

A simple argument, based on Lagrangian statistics and a local analysis of the trajectories near the pipe wall, is used to calculate the constants of proportionality before the logarithmic terms in both the large- and infinite-Péclet-number limits.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 280 , 10 December 1994 , pp. 149 - 172
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

With an Appendix by J. F. Brady

References

Acrivos, A. & Goddard, J. D. 1965 Asymptotic expansions for laminar forced-convection heat and mass transfer. Part 1. Low speed flows. J. Fluid Mech. 23, 273–291.Google Scholar
Aref, H. 1984 Stirring by chaotic advection. J. Fluid Mech. 143, 1–21.Google Scholar
Aris, R. 1956 On the dispersion of solute in a fluid flowing through a tube. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 235, 66–77.Google Scholar
Baudet, C., Guyon, E. & Pomeau, Y. 1985 Dispersion dans un écoulement de Stokes. J. Physique Lett. 46 L991–L998 (in french).Google Scholar
Dean, W. R. 1927 Note on the motion of fluid in a curved pipe. Phil. Mag. 4, 208–223.Google Scholar
Dean, W. R. 1928 The streamline motion of fluid in a curved pipe. Phil. Mag. 5, 673–693.Google Scholar
Erdogan, M. C. & Chatwin, P. C. 1967 The effects of curvature and buoyancy on the laminar dispersion of solute in a horizontal tube. J. Fluid Mech. 29, 465–484.Google Scholar
Guyon, E., Nadal, J.-P. & Pomeau, Y. (eds.) 1988 Disorder and Mixing. Kluwer.
Johnson, M. & Kamm, R. D. 1986 Numerical studies of steady flow dispersion at low Dean number in a gently curving tube. J. Fluid Mech. 172, 329–345.Google Scholar
Jones, S. W., Thomas, O. M. & Aref, H. 1989 Chaotic advection by laminar flow in a twisted pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 209, 335–357 (referred to herein as JTA).Google Scholar
Josselin de Jong, G. de 1958 Longitudinal and transverse diffusion in granular deposits. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 39, 67–74.Google Scholar
Karney, C. F. F. 1983 Long-time correlations in the stochastic regime. Physica D 8, 360–380.Google Scholar
Koch, D. L. & Brady, J. F. 1985 Dispersion in fixed beds. J. Fluid Mech. 154, 399–427.Google Scholar
Koch, D. L. & Brady, J. F. 1987 Nonlocal dispersion in porous media: nonmechanical effects. Chem. Engng Sci. 42, 1377–1392.Google Scholar
Koch, D. L., Cox, R. G., Brenner, H. & Brady, J. F. 1989 The effect of order on dispersion in porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 200, 173–188.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, A. J. & Lieberman, M. A. 1982 Regular and Stochastic Motion. Springer.
Meiss, J. D. & Ott, E. 1986 Markov tree model of transport in area-preserving maps. Physica D 20, 387–402.Google Scholar
Nunge, R. J., Lin, T.-S. & Gill, W. N. 1972 Laminar dispersion in curved tubes and channels. J. Fluid Mech. 51, 363–383.Google Scholar
Saffman, P. G. 1959 A theory of dispersion in a porous medium. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 321–349.Google Scholar
Saxena, A. K. & Nigam, K. D. P. 1984 Coiled configuration for flow inversion and its effect on residence time distribution. AIChE J. 30, 363–368.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1921 Diffusion by continuous movements. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 20, 196–212.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1953 Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 219, 186–203.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1954 The dispersion of matter in turbulent flow through a pipe. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 223, 446–468.Google Scholar
Young, W. R. & Jones, S. W. 1991 Dispersion in an unconsolidated porous medium. Phys. Fluids A 3, 2468–2470.Google Scholar