Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T21:42:42.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Separation drag reduction through a spanwise oscillating pressure gradient

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2021

Vinh-Tan Nguyen Open the ORCID record for Vinh-Tan Nguyen [Opens in a new window] ,
Pierre Ricco Open the ORCID record for Pierre Ricco [Opens in a new window]  and
Gianluca Pironti
Vinh-Tan Nguyen
Affiliation:
Institute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science Technology and Research, 1 Fusionopolis Way, 16-16 Connexis North, Republic of Singapore, 570213
Pierre Ricco*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, S1 3JDSheffield, United Kingdom
Gianluca Pironti
Affiliation:
Institute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science Technology and Research, 1 Fusionopolis Way, 16-16 Connexis North, Republic of Singapore, 570213 Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, S1 3JDSheffield, United Kingdom
*
†Email address for correspondence: p.ricco@sheffield.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An oscillating spanwise pressure gradient is imposed numerically to control the flow separation and reduce the drag of a turbulent flow in a channel with square bars. The transverse flow produces a maximum drag reduction of 25 %, due to lower pressure and skin-friction drag forces. The pressure drag reduction reaches a maximum of 22 % and is due to a decrease of the positive high pressure in front of the bars and an increase of the low negative pressure behind the bars. The skin-friction drag reduction is caused by a lower wall-shear stress along the cavity between the bars where the flow is fully attached, while the wall-shear stress on the crest of the bars and in the separated region behind the bars is unaffected. The spanwise laminar flow obtained by neglecting the nonlinear terms involving the turbulent velocity fluctuations is used to compute the power spent for oscillating the fluid along the spanwise direction and an excellent agreement is found with the power spent obtained by the averaged turbulent flow. A marginal or negative net power saved is found by subtracting the power employed for controlling the flow from the power saved thanks to the transverse flow. The control reduces the total drag as the integral of the Reynolds stresses along the horizontal line connecting the corners of two consecutive bars is decreased, which in turn impacts the pressure and wall-shear stress reductions.

JFM classification

Wakes/Jets: Separated flows Flow Control: Drag reduction Wakes/Jets: Shear layers
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 912 , 10 April 2021 , A20
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banchetti, J., Luchini, P. & Quadrio, M. 2020 Turbulent drag reduction over curved walls. J. Fluid Mech. 896, A10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brackston, R.D., García De La Cruz, J.M., Wynn, A., Rigas, G. & Morrison, J.F. 2016 a Stochastic modelling and feedback control of bistability in a turbulent bluff body wake. J. Fluid Mech. 802, 726–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brackston, R.D., Wynn, A. & Morrison, J.F. 2016 b Extremum seeking to control the amplitude and frequency of a pulsed jet for bluff body drag reduction. Exp. Fluids 57 (10), 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brackston, R.D., Wynn, A. & Morrison, J.F. 2018 Modelling and feedback control of vortex shedding for drag reduction of a turbulent bluff body wake. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 71, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. & Wray, W. 1974 A conceptual study of leading-edge-vortex enhancement by blowing. J. Aircraft 11 (1), 34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bragg, M.B. & Gregorek, G.M. 1987 Experimental study of airfoil performance with vortex generators. J. Aircraft 24 (5), 305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calarese, W., Crisler, W. & Gustafson, G. 1985 Afterbody drag reduction by vortex generators. In 23rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, p. 354. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, P.K. 2014 Separation of Flow. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Chng, T.L., Rachman, A., Tsai, H.M. & Zha, G. 2009 Flow control of an airfoil via injection and suction. J. Aircraft 46 (1), 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, M., Choi, S. & Choi, H. 2016 Control of flow separation in a turbulent boundary layer using time-periodic forcing. Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Engng 138 (10), 101204.Google Scholar
Choi, H., Lee, J. & Park, H. 2014 Aerodynamics of heavy vehicles. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46, 441–468.Google Scholar
Chun, S., Lee, I. & Sung, H.J. 1999 Effect of spanwise-varying local forcing on turbulent separated flow over a backward-facing step. Exp. Fluids 26 (5), 437–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corke, T.C., Jumper, E.J., Post, M.L, Orlov, D. & McLaughlin, T.E. 2002 Application of weakly-ionized plasmas as wing flow-control devices. AIAA Paper 2002-350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, P., 2017 ANL, Illinois. Available at: https://nek5000.mcs.anl.gov.Google Scholar
Fukagata, K., Iwamoto, K. & Kasagi, N. 2002 Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 14 (11), 73–76.Google Scholar
Gharib, M. & Roshko, A. 1987 The effect of flow oscillations on cavity drag. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 501–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenblatt, D., Paschal, K.B., Yao, C.S., Harris, J., Schaeffler, N.W. & Washburn, A.E. 2006 Experimental investigation of separation control. Part 1: baseline and steady suction. AIAA J. 44 (12), 2820–2830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gad-el Hak, M., Pollard, A. & Bonnet, J.P. 1998 Flow Control: Fundamentals and Practices. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heenan, A.F. & Morrison, J.F. 1998 Passive control of backstep flow. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 16, 122–132.Google Scholar
Hinze, J.O. 1975 Turbulence, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Huang, J., Corke, T.C. & Thomas, F.O. 2006 Plasma actuators for separation control of low-pressure turbine blades. AIAA J. 44 (1), 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeda, T. & Durbin, P.A. 2007 Direct simulations of a rough-wall channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 571, 235.Google Scholar
Jeong, J. & Hussain, F. 1995 On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jukes, T.N. & Choi, K.S. 2012 Dielectric-barrier-discharge vortex generators: characterisation and optimisation for flow separation control. Exp. Fluids 52 (2), 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, W.J., Mangiavacchi, N. & Akhavan, R. 1992 Suppression of turbulence in wall-bounded flows by high-frequency spanwise oscillations. Phys. Fluids A 4 (8), 1605–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonardi, S., Orlandi, P., Smalley, R.J., Djenidi, L. & Antonia, R.A. 2003 Direct numerical simulations of turbulent channel flow with transverse square bars on one wall. J. Fluid Mech. 491, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, J.C., Robinson, S.K., McGhee, R.J. & Valarezo, W.O. 1994 Separation control on high-lift airfoils via micro-vortex generators. J. Aircraft 31 (6), 1317–1323.Google Scholar
Lin, J.C., Selby, G.V. & Howard, F.G. 1991 Exploratory study of vortex-generating devices for turbulent flow separation control. AIAA Paper 1991-42.Google Scholar
Maday, Y., Patera, A.T. & Rønquist, E.M. 1990 An operator-integration-factor splitting method for time-dependent problems: application to incompressible fluid flow. J. Sci. Comput. 5 (4), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. & Seginer, A. 1994 Effects of periodic spanwise blowing on delta-wing configuration characteristics. AIAA J. 32 (4), 708–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minelli, G., Tokarev, M., Zhang, J., Liu, T., Chernoray, V., Basara, B. & Krajnović, S. 2019 Active aerodynamic control of a separated flow using streamwise synthetic jets. Flow Turbul. Combust. 103 (4), 1039–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neretti, G. 2016 Active flow control by using plasma actuators. In Recent Progress in Some Aircraft Technologies, pp. 57–76. IntechOpen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuber, R.J. & Needham, J.R. 1948 Exploratory wind-tunnel investigation of the effectiveness of area suction in eliminating leading-edge separation over an NACA 641A212 airfoil. NASA Langley Research Center.Google Scholar
Oliveira, P.J. & Younis, B.A. 2000 On the prediction of turbulent flows around full-scale buildings. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 86 (2–3), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S.B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, M.L. & Corke, T.C. 2004 Separation control on high angle of attack airfoil using plasma actuators. AIAA J. 42 (11), 2177–2184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, M.L. & Corke, T.C. 2006 Separation control using plasma actuators: dynamic stall vortex control on oscillating airfoil. AIAA J. 44 (12), 3125–3135.Google Scholar
Quadrio, M. & Ricco, P. 2003 Initial response of a turbulent channel flow to spanwise oscillation of the walls. J. Turbul. 4 (7), N7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio, M. & Ricco, P. 2004 Critical assessment of turbulent drag reduction through spanwise wall oscillations. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 251–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio, M. & Ricco, P. 2011 The laminar generalized Stokes layer and turbulent drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 667, 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio, M., Ricco, P. & Viotti, C. 2009 Streamwise-travelling waves of spanwise wall velocity for turbulent drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 627, 161–178.Google Scholar
Ricco, P. & Hahn, S. 2013 Turbulent drag reduction through rotating discs. J. Fluid Mech. 722, 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricco, P. & Hicks, P.D. 2018 Streamwise-travelling viscous waves in channel flows. J. Engng Maths 120, 861–869.Google Scholar
Ricco, P., Ottonelli, C., Hasegawa, Y. & Quadrio, M. 2012 Changes in turbulent dissipation in a channel flow with oscillating walls. J. Fluid Mech. 700, 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricco, P. & Quadrio, M. 2008 Wall-oscillation conditions for drag reduction in turbulent channel flow. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 29, 601–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seifert, A. & Pack, L.G. 2002 Active flow separation control on wall-mounted hump at high Reynolds numbers. AIAA J. 40 (7), 1363–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touber, E. & Leschziner, M.A. 2012 Near-wall streak modification by spanwise oscillatory wall motion and drag-reduction mechanisms. J. Fluid Mech. 693, 150–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trujillo, S.M., Bogard, D.G. & Ball, K.S. 1997 Turbulent boundary layer drag reduction using an oscillating wall. AIAA Paper 1997-1870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, C. & Kontis, K. 2007 Flow control by spanwise blowing on a NACA 0012. J. Aircraft 44 (1), 337–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar