Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T17:55:15.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A priori testing of subgrid models for chemically reacting non-premixed turbulent shear flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 1997

JAVIER JIMÉNEZ
Affiliation:
Centre for Turbulent Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA School of Aeronautics, Universidad Politécnica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
AMABLE LIÑÁN
Affiliation:
Centre for Turbulent Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA School of Aeronautics, Universidad Politécnica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
MICHAEL M. ROGERS
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Centre, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
FRANCISCO J. HIGUERA
Affiliation:
Centre for Turbulent Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA School of Aeronautics, Universidad Politécnica, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Abstract

The β-assumed-p.d.f. approximation of Cook & Riley (1994) is tested as a subgrid model for the LES computation of non-premixed turbulent reacting flows, in the limit of infinitely fast chemistry, for two plane constant-density turbulent mixing layers with different degrees of intermittency. Excellent results are obtained in the computation of plane-averaged properties, such as product mass fractions and relatively high powers of the temperature, and even of the p.d.f. of the conserved scalar itself. In all these cases the errors are small enough to be useful in practical applications. The analysis is extended to slightly out-of-equilibrium problems, such as the generation of radicals, and formulated in terms of the p.d.f. of the gradient of the mixture fraction. It is shown that the form of the conditional gradient distribution is universal in a wide range of cases, whose limits are established. Within those limits, engineering approximations to the radical concentration are also possible. It is argued that the experiments in this paper are already in the limit of high Reynolds numbers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)