Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T21:14:45.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Power-generation enhancements and upstream flow properties of turbines in unsteady inflow conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2023

Nathaniel J. Wei Open the ORCID record for Nathaniel J. Wei [Opens in a new window]  and
John O. Dabiri Open the ORCID record for John O. Dabiri [Opens in a new window]
Nathaniel J. Wei
Affiliation:
Graduate Aerospace Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
John O. Dabiri*
Affiliation:
Graduate Aerospace Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: jodabiri@caltech.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Energy-harvesting systems in complex flow environments, such as floating offshore wind turbines, tidal turbines and ground-fixed turbines in axial gusts, encounter unsteady streamwise flow conditions that affect their power generation and structural loads. In some cases, enhancements in time-averaged power generation above the steady-flow operating point are observed. To characterize these dynamics, a nonlinear dynamical model for the rotation rate and power extraction of a periodically surging turbine is derived and connected to two potential-flow representations of the induction zone upstream of the turbine. The model predictions for the time-averaged power extraction of the turbine and the upstream flow velocity and pressure are compared against data from experiments conducted with a surging-turbine apparatus in an open-circuit wind tunnel at a diameter-based Reynolds number $Re_D = 6.3\times 10^5$ and surge-velocity amplitudes up to 24 % of the wind speed. The combined modelling approach captures trends in both the time-averaged power extraction and the fluctuations in upstream flow quantities, while relying only on data from steady-flow measurements. The sensitivity of the observed increases in time-averaged power to steady-flow turbine characteristics is established, thus clarifying the conditions under which these enhancements are possible. Finally, the influence of unsteady fluid mechanics on time-averaged power extraction is explored analytically. The theoretical framework and experimental validation provide a cohesive modelling approach that can drive the design, control and optimization of turbines in unsteady flow conditions, as well as inform the development of novel energy-harvesting systems that can leverage unsteady flows for large increases in power-generation capacities.

JFM classification

Aerodynamics: Aerodynamics
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 966 , 10 July 2023 , A30
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Araya, D.B., Craig, A.E., Kinzel, M. & Dabiri, J.O. 2014 Low-order modeling of wind farm aerodynamics using leaky Rankine bodies. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 6, 063118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastankhah, M. & Porté-Agel, F. 2017 Wind tunnel study of the wind turbine interaction with a boundary-layer flow: upwind region, turbine performance, and wake region. Phys. Fluids 29 (6), 065105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G.K. 2000 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bempedelis, N. & Steiros, K. 2022 Analytical all-induction state model for wind turbine wakes. Phys. Rev. Fluids 7 (3), 034605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergh, H. & Tijdeman, H. 1965 Theoretical and experimental results for the dynamic response of pressure measuring systems. Tech. Rep. NLR-TR F.238. National Aerospace Laboratory NLR.Google Scholar
Betz, A. 1920 Das Maximum der theoretisch möglichen Ausnützung des Windes durch Windmotoren. Z. gesamte Turbinenwesen 26, 307–309.Google Scholar
Borraccino, A., Schlipf, D., Haizmann, F. & Wagner, R. 2017 Wind field reconstruction from nacelle-mounted lidar short-range measurements. Wind Energy Sci. 2 (1), 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branlard, E. & Gaunaa, M. 2015 Cylindrical vortex wake model: right cylinder. Wind Energy 18 (11), 1973–1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennen, C.E. 1982 A review of added mass and fluid inertial forces. Tech. Rep. CR 82.010. Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory.Google Scholar
Calaf, M., Meneveau, C. & Meyers, J. 2010 Large eddy simulation study of fully developed wind-turbine array boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 22 (1), 015110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chattot, J.-J. 2014 Actuator disk theory – steady and unsteady models. Trans. ASME: J. Sol. Energy Engng 136 (3), 031012.Google Scholar
Dabiri, J.O. 2020 Theoretical framework to surpass the Betz limit using unsteady fluid mechanics. Phys. Rev. Fluids 5 (2), 022501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Makdah, A.M., Ruzzante, S., Zhang, K. & Rival, D.E. 2019 The influence of axial gusts on the output of low-inertia rotors. J. Fluids Struct. 88, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eltayesh, A., Hanna, M.B., Castellani, F., Huzayyin, A.S., El-Batsh, H.M., Burlando, M. & Becchetti, M. 2019 Effect of wind tunnel blockage on the performance of a horizontal axis wind turbine with different blade number. Energies 12 (10), 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrugia, R., Sant, T. & Micallef, D. 2014 Investigating the aerodynamic performance of a model offshore floating wind turbine. Renew. Energy 70, 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrugia, R., Sant, T. & Micallef, D. 2016 A study on the aerodynamics of a floating wind turbine rotor. Renew. Energy 86, 770–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granlund, K., Monnier, B., Ol, M. & Williams, D. 2014 Airfoil longitudinal gust response in separated vs attached flows. Phys. Fluids 26 (2), 027103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gribben, B.J. & Hawkes, G.S. 2019 A potential flow model for wind turbine induction and wind farm blockage. Tech. Rep. Frazer-Nash Consultancy.Google Scholar
Heck, K.S., Johlas, H.M. & Howland, M.F. 2023 Modelling the induction, thrust and power of a yaw-misaligned actuator disk. J. Fluid Mech. 959, A9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heier, S. 2014 Grid Integration of Wind Energy: Onshore and Offshore Conversion Systems. John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, K.B. & Guala, M. 2016 Upwind preview to a horizontal axis wind turbine: a wind tunnel and field-scale study. Wind Energy 19 (8), 1371–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johlas, H.M., Martínez-Tossas, L.A., Churchfield, M.J., Lackner, M.A. & Schmidt, D.P. 2021 Floating platform effects on power generation in spar and semisubmersible wind turbines. Wind Energy 24 (8), 901–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johlas, H.M., Martínez-Tossas, L.A., Schmidt, D.P., Lackner, M.A. & Churchfield, M.J. 2019 Large eddy simulations of floating offshore wind turbine wakes with coupled platform motion. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1256 (1), 012018.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. 1980 Helicopter Theory. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jonkman, J. 2008 Influence of control on the pitch damping of a floating wind turbine. In 2008 ASME Wind Energy Symposium Reno, NV, USA. NREL/CP-500-42589. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, J.-K. & James, D.F. 1973 Fluid flow around and through a screen. J. Fluid Mech. 60 (3), 513–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kuik, G.A.M. The Lanchester–Betz–Joukowsky limit. Wind Energy 10 (3), 289–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, S.H. 1916 Hydrodynamics, 4th edn. University Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, G.C. & Hansen, K.S. 2014 Full-scale measurements of aerodynamic induction in a rotor plane. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 555, 012063.Google Scholar
Larsen, T.J. & Hanson, T.D. 2007 A method to avoid negative damped low frequent tower vibrations for a floating, pitch controlled wind turbine. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 75, 012073.Google Scholar
López-Queija, J., Robles, E., Jugo, J. & Alonso-Quesada, S. 2022 Review of control technologies for floating offshore wind turbines. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 167, 112787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, S., Boorsma, K., Caboni, M., Cormier, M., Lutz, T., Schito, P. & Zasso, A. 2020 Characterization of the unsteady aerodynamic response of a floating offshore wind turbine to surge motion. Wind Energy Sci. 5 (4), 1713–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, J., Peña, A., Troldborg, N. & Andersen, S.J. 2018 How does turbulence change approaching a rotor? Wind Energy Sci. 3 (1), 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medici, D., Ivanell, S., Dahlberg, J.-Å. & Alfredsson, P.H. 2011 The upstream flow of a wind turbine: blockage effect. Wind Energy 14 (5), 691–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer Forsting, A., Rathmann, O., van der Laan, M.P., Troldborg, N., Gribben, B., Hawkes, G. & Branlard, E. 2021 Verification of induction zone models for wind farm annual energy production estimation. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1934 (1), 012023.Google Scholar
Modarresi, K. & Kirchhoff, R.H. 1979 The flow field upstream of a horizontal axis wind turbine. Tech. Rep. Paper 10. University of Massachusetts Wind Energy Center.Google Scholar
Sarmast, S., Segalini, A., Mikkelsen, R.F. & Ivanell, S. 2016 Comparison of the near-wake between actuator-line simulations and a simplified vortex model of a horizontal-axis wind turbine. Wind Energy 19 (3), 471–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simley, E., Angelou, N., Mikkelsen, T., Sjöholm, M., Mann, J. & Pao, L.Y. 2016 Characterization of wind velocities in the upstream induction zone of a wind turbine using scanning continuous-wave lidars. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 8 (1), 013301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiros, K. & Hultmark, M. 2018 Drag on flat plates of arbitrary porosity. J. Fluid Mech. 853, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R.J.A.M. & Meneveau, C. 2017 Flow structure and turbulence in wind farms. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49 (1), 311–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strom, B., Brunton, S.L. & Polagye, B. 2017 Intracycle angular velocity control of cross-flow turbines. Nat. Energy 2 (8), 17103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G.I. 1944 The aerodynamics of porous sheets. Tech. Rep. 2237. Aeronautical Research Council.Google Scholar
Tranter, C.J. 1968 Bessel Functions with Some Physical Applications. Hart.Google Scholar
Troldborg, N. & Meyer Forsting, A.R. 2017 A simple model of the wind turbine induction zone derived from numerical simulations. Wind Energy 20 (12), 2011–2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vaal, J.B., Hansen, M.O.L. & Moan, T. 2014 Effect of wind turbine surge motion on rotor thrust and induced velocity. Wind Energy 17 (1), 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayman, E.N. 2006 Coupled dynamics and economic analysis of floating wind turbine systems. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, N.J. & Dabiri, J.O. 2022 Phase-averaged dynamics of a periodically surging wind turbine. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 14 (1), 013305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, B., Tian, X., Dong, X., Peng, Z. & Zhang, W. 2017 Influences of surge motion on the power and thrust characteristics of an offshore floating wind turbine. Energy 141, 2054–2068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.E. & Lissaman, P.B.S. 1974 Applied aerodynamics of wind power machines. Tech. Rep. PB-238595. Oregon State University.Google Scholar
Yu, W., Tavernier, D., Ferreira, C., van Kuik, G.A.M. & Schepers, G. 2019 New dynamic-inflow engineering models based on linear and nonlinear actuator disc vortex models. Wind Energy 22 (11), 1433–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar