Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T18:19:35.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the high-Rayleigh-number structure of steady laminar natural-convection flow in a square enclosure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

M. R. Ravi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Applied Physics, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5046, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands. Present address: FAST, URA-871, CNRS, Bâtiment 502, 91405 Orsay, France.
R. A. W. M. Henkes
Affiliation:
Faculty of Applied Physics, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5046, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands. Present address: Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5058, 2600 GB Delft, The Netherlands.
C. J. Hoogendoorn
Affiliation:
Faculty of Applied Physics, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5046, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Natural-convection flow in an enclosure with adiabatic horizontal walls and isothermal vertical walls maintained at a fixed temperature difference has been investigated. At high values of the natural-convection parameter, the Rayleigh number, a recirculating pocket appears near the corners downstream of the vertical walls, and the flow separates and reattaches at the horizontal walls in the vicinity of this recirculation. There is also a considerable thickening of the horizontal layer. In some previous studies by different authors, this corner flow was considered to be caused by an internal hydraulic jump, and the jump theory was used to predict bifurcation of the steady flow into periodic flow. The present work examines the corner phenomenon closely to decide if it is indeed caused by a hydraulic jump. The results of the analysis reveal the oversimplification of the problem made in the previous studies: there is no connection of the corner phenomenon with a hydraulic jump. The separation of flow at the ceiling is not a feature of hydraulic jumps, and the essential energy loss associated with hydraulic jumps is not observed in the corner flow. It is shown that the corner structure is caused by thermal effects. Owing to the temperature undershoots in vertical boundary layer, which are known to be caused by the stable thermal stratification of the core, relatively cold fluid reaches the upper corner. This cold fluid detaches from the ceiling like a plume at high Rayleigh numbers, and causes the separation and recirculation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armfield, S. W. & Patterson, J. C. 1991 Direct simulation of wave interactions in unsteady natural convection in a cavity. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 34, 929940.Google Scholar
Blythe, P. A., Daniels, P. G. & Simkins, P. G. 1983 Thermal convection in a cavity: the core structure near the horizontal boundaries. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 387, 367388.Google Scholar
Cheesewright, R. 1967 Natural convection from a plane, vertical surface in non-isothermal surroundings. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 10, 18471859.Google Scholar
Chenoweth, D. R. & Paolucci, S. 1986 Natural convection in an enclosed vertical air layer with large horizontal temperature differences. J. Fluid Mech. 169, 173210.Google Scholar
Gill, A. E. 1966 The boundary layer regime for convection in a rectangular cavity. J. Fluid Mech. 26, 515536.Google Scholar
Graebel, W. P. 1981 The influence of Prandtl number on free convection in a rectangular cavity. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 24, 125131.Google Scholar
Henkes, R. A. W. M. 1990 Natural convection boundary layers. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Henkes, R. A. W. M. & Hoogendoorn, C. J. 1989 Laminar natural convection boundary layer flow along a vertical heated plate in a stratified environment. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 32, 147155.Google Scholar
Henkes, R. A. W. M. & Hoogendoorn, C. J. 1990 On the stability of natural convection flow in a cavity heated from the side. Appl. Sci. Res., 47, 195220.Google Scholar
Ivey, G. N. 1984 Experiments on transient natural convection in a cavity. J. Fluid Mech. 144, 389401.Google Scholar
Janssen, R. J. A. & Henkes, R. A. W. M. 1993 Accuracy of finite-volume discretizations for the bifurcating natural-convection flow in a heated square cavity. Numer. Heat Transfer B 24, 191207.Google Scholar
Le Quéré, P. 1991 Accurate solutions to the square thermally driven cavity at high Rayleigh number. Comput. Fluids 20, 2941.Google Scholar
Le Quéré, P. 1987 Étude de la transition à l’instationnarité des écoulements de convection naturelle en cavité verticale différentiellement chauffée par méthodes spectrales Chebyshev. Thése d’Etat, University of Poitiers, France.
Long, R. R. 1953 Some aspects of the flow of stratified fluids. 1. A theoretical investigation. Tellus 5, 4258.Google Scholar
Long, R. R. 1955 Some aspects of the flow of stratified fluids. 3. Continuous density gradients. Tellus 7, 341357.Google Scholar
Paolucci, S. & Chenoweth, D. R. 1989 Transition to chaos in a differentially heated vertical cavity. J. Fluid Mech. 201, 379410.Google Scholar
Patterson, J. C. & Armfield, S. W. 1990 Transient features of natural convection in a cavity. J. Fluid Mech. 219, 469497.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S. 1972 Buoyancy Effects in Fluids. Cambridge University Press.
Vahl Davis, G. de 1983 Natural convection of air in a square cavity: A benchmark numerical solution. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 3, 249264.Google Scholar
Yang, K. T., Novotny, J. L. & Cheng, Y. S. 1972 Laminar free convection from a nonisothermal plate immersed in a temperature stratified medium. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 15, 10971109.Google Scholar