Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:24:38.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On coherent structures in a highly excited mixing layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

I. Weisbrot  and
I. Wygnanski
I. Weisbrot
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv. Tel-Aviv 69978. Israel
I. Wygnanski
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv. Tel-Aviv 69978. Israel Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The flow field in a two-dimensional mixing layer, highly disturbed by a sinusoidally oscillating flap, was mapped in order to estimate the significance of the nonlinear processes associated with the large coherent structures existing in this flow. A mixing layer which does not diverge linearly in the direction of streaming is loosely defined as being highly disturbed. Two velocity components were measured throughout the flow field using a rake of X-wire probes. Streaklines were calculated from the phase-locked measured data and were compared to pictures of smoke injected into the flow, creating a link between flow visualization and quantitative experimental results. The phase-locked vorticity and the Reynolds stresses were calculated from these measurements.

It was determined that fluctuations, locked in phase with the disturbance frequency, were not only responsible for the fast initial growth of the mixing layer but also for its contraction farther downstream (the occurrence of regions I and II in the parlance of Oster & Wygnanski 1982). The resumption of the growth of the mixing layer in region III is not controlled by the phase-locked oscillations. The first subharmonic of the imposed frequency was insignificant everywhere, and vortex amalgamation was not observed by visual means.

Detailed comparisons between experimental results and theoretical calculations, based on a linear stability model, were carried out. The theory predicted very well the normalized, cross-flow distribution of any quantity that was measured, but failed to predict the amplification rates of these quantities in the direction of streaming.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 195 , October 1988 , pp. 137 - 159
Copyright
© 1988 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acton E. 1976 The modelling of large eddies in a two-dimensional shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 76, 561.Google Scholar
Ashurst W. T. 1979 Numerical simulation of turbulent mixing layers via vortex dynamics. In Turbulent Shear Flows, vol. 1 (ed. F. Durst, B. E. Launder, F. W. Schmidt & J. H. Whitelaw), p. 402. Springer.
Bouthier M. 1972 Stabilité linéaire des écoulements presque paralléles. J. Méc. 11, 599.Google Scholar
Brown, G. L. & Roshko A. 1974 On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 775.Google Scholar
Browand, F. K. & Ho C. M. 1983 The mixing layer: an example of quasi two-dimensional turbulence. J. Méc., Numero Special, p. 99.Google Scholar
Browand, F. K. & Weidman P. D. 1976 Large scales in the developing mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 76, 127.Google Scholar
Corcos, G. M. & Sherman F. S. 1984 The mixing layer: deterministic models of a turbulent flow, part 1. Introduction and the two-dimensional flow. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 29.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. G. & Gaster M. 1976 Stability of slowly diverging jet flow. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 397.Google Scholar
Fiedler, H. E. & Mensing P. 1985 The plane turbulent shear layer with periodic excitation. J. Fluid Mech. 150, 281.Google Scholar
Gaster M., Kit, E. & Wygnanski I. 1985 Large scale structures in a forced turbulent mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 150, 23.Google Scholar
Ho, C. M. & Huang L. S. 1982 Subharmonics and vortex merging in mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 443.Google Scholar
Ho, C. M. & Huerre P. 1984 Perturbed free shear layers. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 365.Google Scholar
Hussain A. K. M. F. 1983 Coherent structures - reality and myth. Phys. Fluids 26, 2816.Google Scholar
Inoue, O. & Leonard A. 1987 Vortex simulation of forced/unforced mixing layers. AIAA Paper 87–0288.Google Scholar
Kelly R. E. 1967 On the stability of an inviscid shear layer which is periodic in space and time. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 657.Google Scholar
Michalke A. 1964 On the inviscid instability of the hyperbolic tangent velocity profile. J. Fluid Mech. 19, 543.Google Scholar
Michalke A. 1965 Vortex formation in a free boundary layer according to stability theory. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 371.Google Scholar
Monkewitz, P. A. & Huerre P. 1982 The influence of velocity ratio on the spatial instability of mixing layers. Phys. Fluids 25, 1137.Google Scholar
Oster, D. & Wygnanski I. 1982 The forced mixing layer between parallel streams. J. Fluid Mech. 123, 91.Google Scholar
Oster D., Wygnanski I., Dziomba, B. & Fiedler H. 1978 The effects of initial conditions on the two-dimensional mixing layer. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 75, p. 48.Google Scholar
Patnaik P. C., Sherman, F. S. & Corcos G. M. 1976 A numerical simulation of Kelvin-Helmholtz waves of finite amplitude. J. Fluid Mech. 73, 215.Google Scholar
Riley, J. J. & Metcalfe R. W. 1980 Direct numerical simulation of a perturbed turbulent mixing layer. AIAA Paper 80–0274.Google Scholar
Winant, C. D. & Browand F. K. 1974 Vortex pairing, the mechanism of turbulent mixing-layer growth at moderate Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 237.Google Scholar
Wygnanski I., Fiedler H., Oster, D. & Dziomba B. 1979 On the perseverance of a quasi two-dimensional eddy structure in a turbulent mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 93, 325.Google Scholar
Wygnanski I., Marasali, B. & Champagne F. 1987 On the weakly nonlinear stability model applied to a diverging small-deficit wake. AIAA Paper 87–1465.Google Scholar
Wygnanski, I. & Weisbrot I. 1988 On the pairing process in an excited, plane, turbulent mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 161–173.Google Scholar