Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T21:34:30.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On a model of laminar–turbulent transition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

G. I. Barenblatt
Affiliation:
P. P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 117218, USSR

Abstract

In the perturbation theory of a shear flow, a small-lengthscale turbulent perturbation field component developing from the pre-existing turbulence is taken into account along with the usual long-wave (smooth) component. The perturbation turbulence field is assumed to be fully developed, and to satisfy the Kolmogorov-type similarity hypotheses. At the same time the perturbations of the mean velocity field and its gradient due to turbulence are assumed to be small. Under some approximations a closed autonomous set of equations governing the evolution of the turbulent perturbation field can be obtained and qualitatively investigated. The investigation shows in particular that, depending on the initial conditions, the turbulent energy of perturbation can either increase monotonically, or decrease at first and only later start to increase.

Thus, the proposed model of laminar-turbulent transition includes two mechanisms: the usual mechanism of nonlinear self-modulation of long-wave perturbation components, which prevails for small pre-existing turbulence, and the mechanism of the evolution of the small-scale pre-existing turbulence which prevails otherwise. The experimental data are discussed and confirm qualitatively the proposed model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1990 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K.: 1953 The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.
Batchelor, G. K. & Townsend, A. A., 1949 Decay of isotropic turbulence in the initial period. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A A193, 539.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W.: 1969 Life of Physics. Evening Lectures at the International Centre of Theoretical Physics in Trieste. Vienna. IAIA.
Kochin, N. E., Kibel, I. A. & Roze, N. V., 1964 Theoretical Hydromechanics, Vol. II. Available from ASTIA as AD 129210.
Kolmogorov, A. N.: 1942 Equations of turbulent motion of an incompressible fluid. Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, Fiz. 6, (1–2), 56 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kolyada, V. V. & Paveliev, A. A., 1986 On the change of transition to turbulence mechanisms in boundary layers. Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, Mech. Zhid. i Gaza 3, 179 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M., 1959 Fluid Mechanics. Pergamon.
Offen, G. R. & Kline, S. J., 1975 A proposed model of the bursting process in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 70, 209.Google Scholar
Popham, A. E.: 1964 The Drawings of Leonardo da Vinci, pp. 7072, plates 279–282. Jonathan Cape.
Reynolds, W. C.: 1976 Computation of turbulent flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 8, 183.Google Scholar
Rohr, J. J., Itsweire, E. C., Helland, K. M. & Van Atta, C. W. 1988 An investigation of the growth of turbulence in a uniform mean-shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 187, 1.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H.: 1933 Zur Entstehung der Turbulenz bei der Plattenströmung. Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, Math-Phys. Klasse, p. 181.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H.: 1968 Grenzschicht-Theorie, G. Auflage, G. Braun, Karlsruhe (1 Auflage, 1951).
Schubauer, G. B. & Skramstad, H. K., 1947 Laminar boundary-layer oscillations and stability of laminar flow. J. Aero. Sci. 14, (2), 69.Google Scholar
Swift, J.: 1726 Travels into Several Remote Nations of the World by Lemuel Gulliver. Part 1. Motte.
Tollmien, W.: 1929 Über die Entstehung der Turbulenz. Nachrichten Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, Math-Phys. Klasse, p. 21.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, M. D. 1981 An Album of Fluid Motion. Stanford: Parabolic.