Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:20:38.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nonlinear modulations of solitary waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Geir Pedersen
Geir Pedersen
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics, University of Oslo, PO Box 1053, Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The leading optical approximation to a slowly varying solitary crest on constant depth is the plane soliton solution with the local values of amplitude and orientation substituted. This leads to two nonlinear hyperbolic equations for the local amplitude and inclination of the crest that have been reported by several authors and predict the formation of progressive wave jumps, or shocks, from any initial perturbation of the crest. In comparison to numerical solutions of the Boussinesq equations we find that this optical approximation fails to reproduce essential properties of the crest dynamics, in particular that the crest modulations are damped and that well-defined wave jumps do not necessarily evolve. One purpose of the present work is to include such features in an amended optical approximation.

We obtain the leading correction to the ‘local soliton’ solution by a multiple scale technique. In addition to a modification to the wave profile the perturbation expansion also yields a diffracted wave system and a celerity that depends on the curvature of the crest. The principle of energy conservation then leads us to a second-order optical approximation consisting of transport equations of mixed hyperbolic/parabolic nature. Under additional assumptions the transport equations can be reduced to the well-known Burgers equation.

Numerical simulations of the Boussinesq equations are performed for modulations on otherwise straight crests and radially converging solitons. The improved optical, or ray, theory reproduces all essential features and agrees closely with the numerical solution in both cases. Contrary to purely hyperbolic optical descriptions the present theory also predicts wave jumps of finite width that are consistent with the triad solution of Miles (1977).

The present work indicates that while sinusoidal waves often are appropriately described by the lowest-order physical optics, higher-order corrections must be expected to be important for single crested waves.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 267 , 25 May 1994 , pp. 83 - 108
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cumberbach, E. 1978 Spike solution for radially symmetric solitary waves. Phys. Fluids 21, 374–380.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, R. 1970 The solitary wave in water of variable depth. J. Fluid Mech. 42, 639–656.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, R. 1971 The solitary wave in water of variable depth. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 46, 611–622.Google Scholar
Ko, K. & Kuehl, H. H. 1978 Korteweg-de Vries soliton in a slowly varying medium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 233–236Google Scholar
Ko, K. & Kuehl, H. H. 1979 Cylindrical and spherical Korteweg-deVries solitary waves. Phys. Fluids 22, 1343–1348Google Scholar
Kulikovskii, A. G. & Reutov, V. A. 1976 Movement of solitary and periodic waves with an amplitude close to the limiting in a liquid layer of slowly varying depth. Fluid Dyn. 11, 884–893.Google Scholar
Kulikovskii, A. G. Reutov, V. A. 1980 Propagation of nonlinear waves above semi—infinite underwater troughs and ridges. Fluid Dyn. 15, 217–224.Google Scholar
Laitone, E. V. 1960 The second approximation to cnoidal and solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 9, 430–444.Google Scholar
Liu, L. F. & Yoon, S. B. 1986 Stem waves along a depth discontinuity J. Geophys. Res. 91, 3979–3982.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. & Fenton, J. D. 1974 On the mass, momentum, energy and circulation of a solitary wave II. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 340, 471–493.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1977a Obliquely interacting solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 79, 157–169.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1977b Resonantly interacting solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 79, 171–179.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1977c Diffraction of solitary waves. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 28, 889–902.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1977d An axisymmetric Boussinesq wave J. Fluid Mech. 84, 181–191.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1980 Solitary waves. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 12, 11–43.Google Scholar
Pedersen, G. 1988 Three-dimensional wave patterns generated by moving disturbances at transcritical speeds. J. Fluid Mech. 196, 39–63.Google Scholar
Pedersen, G. 1991 Finite difference representations of nonlinear waves. Intl J. Num. Meth. Fluids 13, 671–690.Google Scholar
Peregrine, D. H. 1983 Wave jumps and caustics in the propagation of finite-amplitude water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 136, 435–452.Google Scholar
Peregrine, D. H. 1985 Water waves and their development in space and time. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 400, 1–18.Google Scholar
Reutov, V. A. 1976 Behaviour of perturbations of solitary and periodic waves on the surface of a heavy liquid. Fluid Dyn. 11, 778–781.Google Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1974 Linear and Nonlinear Waves. Wiley-Interscience. New York.
Witting, J. 1975 On the highest and other solitary waves. SIAM J. Appl. Maths 28, 700–719.Google Scholar
Wu, T. Y. 1981 Long waves in ocean and coastal waters. Proc. ASCE, J. Engng. Mech. Div. 107, (EM3), 501–522.Google Scholar
Yue, D. K. P. & Mei, C. C. 1980 Forward diffraction of Stokes waves by a thin wedge. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 33–52.Google Scholar