Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-05T22:22:31.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nonlinear behaviour of a constant vorticity layer at a wall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

D. I. Pullin
D. I. Pullin
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052 Victoria, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The so-called ‘water-bag’ method is used to study the behaviour of a two-dimensional inviscid layer of constant vorticity ω and of mean thickness δ adjacent to a wall with slip at the wall. A nonlinear initial-value equation is derived which describes the motion of the material interface separating the rotational fluid within the layer from the irrotational free stream, for the case where this interface is subject to streamwise cyclic disturbances to its undisturbed shape. A linearized solution to this equation shows that a sinusoidal disturbance of wavelength λ propagates as one mode of a neutrally stable Kelvin-Helmholtz wave with velocity ωλ[1 − exp (−4πδ/λ)]/4π relative to the fluid at infinity. Numerical solutions of the full nonlinear equation for a range of wavelengths and finite disturbance amplitudes indicate different behaviour. For sufficiently large amplitude the interface valleys evolve into long re-entrant wedges of irrotational fluid which are ‘entrained’ into the layer and which are separated from the free stream by lobes or bulges of rotational fluid. This single-mode nonlinear interfacial distortion could be generated over a broad wavelength range with no indication of preferential scaling based on δ. It is suggested that the interface behaviour bears distinct resemblance to flow features observed at the interface between turbulent and non-turbulent fluid in recent smoke-in-air flow-visualization studies of the outer part of a constant pressure turbulent boundary layer. The calculated rotational fluid lobe velocities, which are not very different from the equivalent linearized wave velocities, are found to be in reasonable agreement with the few existing measurements of the velocity of bulges at the turbulent–nonturbulent fluid interface, while the computed velocity field in the lobe is in qualitative agreement with the general flow pattern observed in experiments. In the absence of a preferred scale or range of scales for the development of the interfacial distortion, however, it is concluded that the present results cannot be interpreted as supporting the hypothesis of the presence of largescale coherent motions in the outer part of the layer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 108 , July 1981 , pp. 401 - 421
Copyright
© 1981 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acton, E. 1976 J. Fluid Mech. 76, 561–592.
Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Berk, H. L., Nielsen, C. E. & Roberts, K. V. 1970 Phys. Fluids 13, 980–995.
Birkhoff, G. 1962 Proc. Symp. Appl. Math. Am. Math. Soc. 13, 55–76.
Brown, G. L. & Thomas, A. S. W. 1977 Phys. Fluids Suppl. 20, 243–252.
Christiansen, J. P. 1973 J. Comput. Phys. 13, 363–379.
Christiansen, J. P. & Zabusky, N. J. 1973 J. Fluid Mech. 61, 219–243.
Deem, G. S. & Zabusky, N. J. 1978a Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 859–862.
Deem, G. S. & Zabusky, N. J. 1978b In Solitons in Action (ed. K. Lonngren & A. Scott), pp. 277–293. Academic.
Falco, R. E. 1977 Phys. Fluids Suppl 20, 124–132.
Fink, P. T. & Soh, W. K. 1978 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 362, 195–209.
Gear, C. W. 1971 Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations. Prentice Hall.
Head, M. R. & Bandyopadhyay, P. 1981 J. Fluid Mech. (to appear).
Kovasznay, L. S. G., Kibens, V. & Blackwelder, R. F. 1970 J. Fluid Mech. 41, 283–325.
Leonard, A. 1980 In Turbulent Shear Flows II (ed. L. J. S. Bradbury), pp. 67–77. Springer.
Michalke, A. 1964 J. Fluid Mech. 19, 543–556.
Moffatt, H. K. & Moore, D. W. 1979 J. Fluid Mech. 87, 749–760.
Moore, D. W. 1978 Stud. App. Math. 58, 119–140.
Moore, D. W. 1979 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 365, 105–119.
Perry, A. E. & Fairlie, B. D. 1975 J. Fluid Mech. 69, 657–672.
Perry, A. E., Lim, T. T. & Chong, M. S. 1980 A.I.A.A. paper 80–1358.
Rayleigh, Lord 1980 Scientific Papers, vol. 1, pp. 474–487. Also Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 11, 57–80.
Rayleigh, Lord 1887 Scientific Papers, vol. 3, pp. 17–23. Also Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 19, 67–74.
Roberts, K. V. & Christiansen, J. P. 1972 Comput. Phys. Commun. Suppl. 3, 14–32.
Rott, N. 1956 J. Fluid Mech. 1, 111–128.
Saffman, P. G. & Baker, G. R. 1979 Ann. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 11, 95–122.
Seo, R. L., Joynt, R. C. & Llewelyn, R. P. 1979 State Electricity Commission of Victoria unpub. rep.
Zabusky, N. J., Hughes, M. H. & Roberts, K. V. 1979 J. Comp. Phys. 30, 96–106.