Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:43:59.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modulated waves in Taylor-Couette flow Part 1. Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

K. T. Coughlin  and
P. S. Marcus
K. T. Coughlin
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
P. S. Marcus
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present a mathematical analysis of the transition from temporally periodic rotating waves to quasi-periodic modulated waves in rotating flows with circularly symmetric boundary conditions, applied to the flow between concentric, rotating cylinders (Taylor-Couette flow). Quasi-periodic flow (modulated wavy vortex flow) is described by two incommensurate, fundamental, temporal frequencies in an arbitrary frame, but the flow is periodic in the appropriate rotating frame. The azimuthal wavelength of the modulation may be different to that of the underlying rotating wave; hence the flow state is described by two azimuthal wavenumbers as well. One frequency and one wavenumber are determined by the wave state, but no simple physical properties have yet been associated with the parameters of the modulation. The current literature on modulated waves displays both conflicting mathematical representations and qualitatively different kinds of modulation. In this paper we use Floquet theory to derive the unique functional form for all modulated waves and show that the space-time symmetry properties follow directly. The flow can be written as a non-separable function of the two phases (θ −c1t, θ −c2t). We show that different branches of modulated wave solutions in Taylor-Couette flow are distinguished not by symmetry but by the ranges of the numerical values of c1, c2, and the spectral amplitudes of the solution. The azimuthal wavenumber associated with the modulation has a unique physical definition but is not directly expressed in the spatial symmetry of the modulated flow. Because modulated waves should occur generically in systems with rotational symmetry, this analysis has application beyond Taylor-Couette flow.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 234 , January 1992 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
© 1992 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brandstater, A. & Swinney, H. L. 1987 Strange attractors in weakly turbulent Couette-Taylor flow. Phys. Rev. A 35, 2207–2220.Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. 1961 Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Oxford University Press.
Coughlin, K. 1990 Quasi-periodic Taylor-Couette flow. Thesis, Physics Department, Harvard University.
Coughlin, K. T. & Marcus, P. S. 1992 Modulated waves in Taylor-Couette flow. Part 2. Numerical simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 234, 19–46.Google Scholar
Coughlin, K. T., Marcus, P. S., Tagg, R. P. & Swinney, H. L. 1991 Distinct quasiperiodic modes with like symmetry in a rotating fluid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1161–1164.Google Scholar
DiPrima, R. C. & Swinney, H. L. 1981 Instabilities and transition in flow between concentric rotating cylinders. In Hydrodynamic Instabilities and the Transition to Turbulence (ed. H. L. Swinney & J. P. Gollub), p. 139. Springer.
Fenstermacher, P. R., Swinney, H. L. & Gollub, J. P. 1979 Dynamical instabilities and the transition to chaotic Taylor vortex flow. J. Fluid Mech. 94, 103–128.Google Scholar
Finlay, W. H., Keller, J. B. & Ferziger, J. H. 1988 Instability and transition in curved channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 194, 417–456.Google Scholar
Gollub, J. B. & Swinney, H. L. 1975 Onset of turbulence in a rotating fluid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 927–930.Google Scholar
Golubitsky, M. & Stewart, I. 1986 Symmetry and stability in Taylor-Couette flow. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 17, 249–288.Google Scholar
Gorman, M. & Swinney, H. L. 1979 Visual observation of the second characteristic mode in a quasiperiodic flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1871–1875.Google Scholar
Gorman, M. & Swinney, H. L. 1982 Spatial and temporal characteristics of modulated waves in the circular Couette system. J. Fluid Mech. 117, 123–142.Google Scholar
Gorman, M., Swinney, H. L. & Rand, D. 1981 Doubly periodic circular Couette flow: experiments compared with predictions from dynamics and symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 992–995.Google Scholar
King, G. P., Li, Y., Lee, W., Swinney, H. L. & Marcus, P. S. 1982 Wave speeds in wavy Taylor vortex flow. J. Fluid Mech. 141, 365–390.Google Scholar
Marcus, P. S. 1984a Simulation of Taylor-Couette flow. Part 1. Numerical methods and comparison with experiment. J. Fluid Mech. 146, 45–64.Google Scholar
Marcus, P. S. 1984b Simulation of Taylor-Couette flow. Part 2. Numerical results for wavyvortex flow with one travelling wave. J. Fluid Mech. 146, 65–113.Google Scholar
Ohji, M., Shionoya, S. & Amagai, K. 1986 A note on modulated wavy disturbances to circular Couette flow. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 55, 1032–1033.Google Scholar
Rand, D. 1982 Dynamics and symmetry. Predictions for modulated waves in rotating fluids. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 79, 1–38.Google Scholar
Ruelle, D. & Takens, F. 1971 On the nature of turbulence. Commun. Math. Phys. 20, 167–192.Google Scholar
Sava¸, Ö. 1985 On flow visualization using reflective flakes. J. Fluid Mech. 152, 235–248.Google Scholar
Shaw, R. S., Andereck, C. D., Reith, L. A. & Swinney, H. L. 1982 Superposition of travelling waves in the circular Couette system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 1172–1175.Google Scholar
Swift, J. B., Gorman, M. & Swinney, H. L. 1982 Modulated wavy vortex flow in laboratory and rotating reference frames. Phys. Lett. 87 A, 457–460.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. & Swinney, H. L. 1985 Nonpropagating oscillatory modes in Couette-Taylor flow. Phys. Rev. A 31, 1006–1009.Google Scholar