Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T20:56:51.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maximum drag reduction state of viscoelastic turbulent channel flow: marginal inertial turbulence or elasto-inertial turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2023

Suming Wang ,
Wenhua Zhang Open the ORCID record for Wenhua Zhang [Opens in a new window] ,
Xinyi Wang ,
Xiaobin Li ,
Hongna Zhang Open the ORCID record for Hongna Zhang [Opens in a new window]  and
Fengchen Li
Suming Wang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, PR China
Wenhua Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, PR China
Xinyi Wang
Affiliation:
School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, PR China
Xiaobin Li
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, PR China
Hongna Zhang*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, PR China
Fengchen Li*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, PR China
*
†Email addresses for correspondence: hongna@tju.edu.cn, lifch@tju.edu.cn
†Email addresses for correspondence: hongna@tju.edu.cn, lifch@tju.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The essence of the maximum drag reduction (MDR) state of viscoelastic drag-reducing turbulence (DRT) is still under debate, which mainly holds two different types of views: the marginal state of inertial turbulence (IT) and elasto-inertial turbulence (EIT). To further promote its understanding, this paper conducts a large number of direct numerical simulations of DRT at a modest Reynolds number Re with $Re = 6000$ for the FENE-P model that covers a wide range of flow states and focuses on the problem of how nonlinear extension affects the nature of MDR by varying the maximum extension length $L$ of polymers. It demonstrates that the essence of the MDR state can be both IT and EIT, where $L$ is somehow an important parameter in determining the dominant dynamics. Moreover, there exists a critical $L_c$ under which the minimum flow drag can be achieved in the MDR state even exceeding the suggested MDR limit. Systematic analyses on the statistical properties, energy spectrum, characteristic structures and underly dynamics show that the dominant dynamics of the MDR state gradually shift from IT-related to EIT-related dynamics with an increase of $L$. The above effects can be explained by the effective elasticity introduced by different $L$ at a fixed Weissenberg number (Wi) as well as the excitation of pure EIT. It indicates that larger $L$ introduces more effective elasticity and is favourable to EIT excitation. Therefore, we argue that the MDR state is still dominated by IT-related dynamics for the case of small $L$, but replaced by EIT-related dynamics at high $L$. The obtained results can harmonize the seemingly controversial viewpoints on the dominant dynamics of the MDR state and also provide some ideas for breaking through the MDR limit, such as searching for a polymer solution with a proper molecular length and concentration.

JFM classification

Non-Newtonian Flows: Viscoelasticity Turbulent Flows: Turbulence simulation Flow Control: Drag reduction
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 960 , 10 April 2023 , A12
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chaudhary, I., Garg, P., Shankar, V. & Subramanian, G. 2019 Elasto-inertial wall mode instabilities in viscoelastic plane Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 881, 119–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choueiri, G.H., Lopez, J.M. & Hof, B. 2018 Exceeding the asymptotic limit of polymer drag reduction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 124501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choueiri, G.H., Lopez, J.M., Varshney, A., Sankar, S. & Hof, B. 2021 Experimental observation of the origin and structure of elastoinertial turbulence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118 (45), e2102350118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Gennes, P.G. & Badoz, J. 1996 Fragile objects. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1, 367–384.Google Scholar
Dubief, Y., Page, J., Kerswell, R.R., Terrapon, V.E. & Steinberg, V. 2022 First coherent structure in elasto-inertial turbulence. Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 073301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubief, Y., Terrapon, V.E. & Julio, S. 2013 On the mechanism of elasto-inertial turbulence. Phys. Fluids 25, 110817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fattal, R. & Kupferman, K. 2004 Constitutive laws for the matrix-logarithm of the conformation tensor. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 123, 281–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garg, P., Chaudhary, I., Khalid, M., Shankar, V. & Subramanian, G. 2018 Viscoelastic pipe flow is linearly unstable. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 024502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groisman, A. & Steinberg, V. 2000 Elastic turbulence in a polymer solution flow. Nature 405, 53–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keunings, R. 1986 On the high Weissenberg number problem. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 20, 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumley, J.L. 1969 Drag reduction by additives. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1, 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumley, J.L. 1973 Drag reduction in turbulent flow by polymer additives. J. Polym. Sci. 7, 263–290.Google Scholar
Min, T., Yoo, J.Y., Choi, H. & Joseph, D.D. 2003 Drag reduction by polymer additives in a turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 486, 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, J., Dubief, Y. & Kerswell, R.R. 2020 Exact travelling wave solutions in viscoelastic channel flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 154501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, A., Thompson, R.L. & Mompean, G. 2019 Beyond the maximum drag reduction asymptote: the pseudo-laminar state. arXiv:1911.00439.Google Scholar
Renard, N. & Deck, S. 2016 A theoretical decomposition of mean skin friction generation into physical phenomena across the boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 790, 339–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samanta, D., Dubief, Y., Holzner, M., Schafer, C., Morozov, A.N., Wagner, C. & Hof, B. 2013 Elasto-inertial turbulence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shekar, A., McMullen, R., McKeon, B. & Graham, M. 2020 Self-sustained elastoinertial Tollmien–Schlichting waves. J. Fluid Mech. 897, A3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shekar, A., McMullen, R.M., McKeon, B.J. & Graham, M.D. 2021 Tollmien–Schlichting route to elastoinertial turbulence in channel flow. Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 093301.Google Scholar
Shekar, A., McMullen, R.M., Wang, S.N., Mckeon, B.J. & Graham, M.D. 2019 Critical-layer structures and mechanisms in elastoinertial turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 124503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sid, S., Terrapon, V.E. & Dubief, Y. 2018 Two-dimensional dynamics of elasto-inertial turbulence and its role in polymer drag reduction. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 011301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, K.R. & White, C.M. 2000 The onset of drag reduction by dilute polymer additives, and the maximum drag reduction asymptote. Exp. Fluids 27 (5), 461–472.Google Scholar
Tabor, M. & de Gennes, P.G. 1986 A cascade theory of drag reduction. Europhys. Lett. 2, 519–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrapon, V.E., Dubief, Y. & Soria, J. 2015 On the role of pressure in elasto-inertial turbulence. J. Turbul. 16, 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toms, B.A. 1949 Some observations on the flow of linear polymer solutions through straight tubes at large Reynolds numbers. In Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Rheology, vol. 2, pp. 135–141.Google Scholar
Vaithianathan, T., Ashish, R., James, G.B. & Lance, R.C. 2006 An improved algorithm for simulating three-dimensional, viscoelastic turbulence. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 140, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virk, P.S. 1971 An elastic sublayer model for drag reduction by dilute solutions of linear macromolecules. J. Fluid Mech. 45, 417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virk, P.S. 1975 Drag reduction fundamentals. AIChE J. 21, 625–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virk, P.S., Merril, E.W., Mickley, H.S. & Smith, K.A. 1967 The Toms phenomenon: turbulent pipe flow of dilute polymer solutions. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warholic, M.D, Massah, H. & Hanratty, T.J. 1999 Influence of drag-reducing polymers on turbulence: effects of Reynolds number, concentration and mixing. J. Fluid Mech. 409, 149–164.Google Scholar
White, C.M. & Mungal, M.G. 2008 Mechanics and prediction of turbulent drag reduction with polymer additives. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 40, 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xi, L. & Bai, X. 2016 Marginal turbulent state of viscoelastic fluids: a polymer drag reduction perspective. Phys. Rev. E 93, 043118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xi, L. & Graham, M.D. 2010 Turbulent drag reduction and multistage transitions in viscoelastic minimal flow units. J. Fluid Mech. 647, 421–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xi, L. & Graham, M.D. 2011 Active and hibernating turbulence in minimal channel flow of Newtonian and polymeric fluids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 218301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamani, S., Keshavarz, B., Raj, Y., Zaki, T.A., McKinley, G.H. & Bischofberger, I. 2021 Spectral universality of elastoinertial turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 074501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamani, S., Raj, Y., Zaki, T.A., McKinley, G.H. & Bischofberger, I. 2022 Spatio-temporal signatures of elasto-inertial turbulence in viscoelastic planar jets. arXiv:2207.10736.Google Scholar
Yu, B. & Kawaguchi, Y. 2004 Direct numerical simulation of viscoelastic drag-reducing flow: a faithful finite difference method. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 116, 431–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W.H., Li, J.F., Wang, Q.K., Ma, Y., Zhang, H.N., Yu, B. & Li, F.C. 2021 c Comparative study on numerical performances of log-conformation representation and standard conformation representation in the simulation of viscoelastic fluid turbulent drag-reducing channel flow. Phys. Fluids 33, 023101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W.H., Shao, Q.Q., Li, Y.K., Ma, Y., Zhang, H.N. & Li, F.C. 2021 b On the mechanisms of sheet-like extension structures formation and self-sustaining process in elasto-inertial turbulence. Phys. Fluids 33, 085107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W.H., Zhang, H.N., Li, J.F., Yu, B. & Li, F.C. 2021 d Comparison of turbulent drag reduction mechanisms of viscoelastic fluids based on the Fukagata–Iwamoto–Kasagi identity and the Renard–Deck identity. Phys. Fluids 32, 013104.Google Scholar
Zhang, W.H., Zhang, H.N., Li, Y.K., Yu, B. & Li, F.C. 2021 a Role of elasto-inertial turbulence in viscoelastic drag-reducing turbulence. Phys. Fluids 33, 081706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W.H., Zhang, H.N., Wang, Z.M., Li, Y.K., Yu, B. & Li, F.C. 2022 Repicturing viscoelastic drag-reducing turbulence by introducing dynamics of elasto-inertial turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 940, A31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, L.& Xi, L. 2021 Nonasymptotic elastoinertial turbulence for asymptotic drag reduction. Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 014601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar