Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T06:44:34.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linear dynamics of wind waves in coupled turbulent air–water flow. Part 2. Numerical model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

J. A. Harris ,
S. E. Belcher  and
R. L. Street
J. A. Harris
Affiliation:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4020, USA Present address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia
S. E. Belcher
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK Present address: Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading RG6 2AU, UK.
R. L. Street
Affiliation:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4020, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We develop a numerical model of the interaction between wind and a small-amplitude water wave. The model first calculates the turbulent flows in both the air and water that would be obtained with a flat interface, and then calculates linear perturbations to this base flow caused by a travelling surface wave. Turbulent stresses in the base flow are parameterized using an eddy viscosity derived from a low-turbulent-Reynolds-number κ – ε model. Turbulent stresses in the perturbed flow are parameterized using a new damped eddy viscosity model, in which the eddy viscosity model is used only in inner regions, and is damped exponentially to zero outside these inner regions. This approach is consistent with previously developed physical scaling arguments. Even on the ocean the interface can be aerodynamically smooth, transitional or rough, so the new model parameterizes the interface with a roughness Reynolds number and retains effects of molecular stresses (on both mean and turbulent parts of the flow).

The damped eddy viscosity model has a free constant that is calibrated by comparing with results from a second-order closure model. The new model is then used to calculate the variation of form drag on a stationary rigid wave with Reynolds number, R. The form drag increases by a factor of almost two as R drops from 2 × 104 to 2 × 103 and shows remarkably good agreement with the value measured by Zilker & Hanratty (1979). These calculations show that the damped eddy viscosity model captures the physical processes that produce the asymmetric pressure that leads to form drag and also wave growth.

Results from the numerical model show reasonable agreement with profiles measured over travelling water waves by Hsu & Hsu (1983), particularly for slower moving waves. The model suggests that the wave-induced flow in the water is irrotational except in an extremely thin interface layer, where viscous stresses are as likely to be important as turbulent stresses. Thus our study reinforces previous suggestions that the region very close to the interface is crucial to wind-wave interaction and shows that scales down to the viscous length may have an order-one effect on the development of the wave.

The energy budget and growth rate of the wave motions, including effects of the sheared current and Reynolds number, will be examined in a subsequent paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 308 , 10 February 1996 , pp. 219 - 254
Copyright
© 1996 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, J. & Hanratty, T. J. 1985 Relaxation effects observed for turbulent flow over a wavy surface. J. Fluid Mech. 151, 443–455.Google Scholar
Al-Zanaidi, M. A. & Hui, W. H. 1984 Turbulent airflow over water waves — a numerical study. J. Fluid Mech. 148, 225–246. Asce Task Committee on Turbulence Models in Hydraulic Computations 1988 Turbulence modeling of surface water flow and transport, Part I. J. Hydraul. Engng 114, 970–991.Google Scholar
Ascher, U. M., Mattheij, R. M. M. & Russell, R. D. 1988 Numerical Solution of Boundary Value Problems for Ordinary Differential Equations. Prentice Hall.
Belcher, S. E., Harris, J. A. & Street, R. L. 1994 Linear dynamics of wind waves in coupled turbulent air-water flow. Part 1. Theory. J. Fluid Mech. 271, 119–151.Google Scholar
Belcher, S. E., Harris, J. A. & Street, R. L. 1995 Linear dynamics of wind-waves in coupled turbulent air-water flow. Part 3. Energy budget. J. Fluid Mech. (submitted).Google Scholar
Belcher, S. E. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1993 Turbulent shear flow over slowly moving waves. J. Fluid Mech. 251, 109–148.Google Scholar
Belcher, S. E., Newley, T. M. J & Hunt, J. C. R. 1993 The drag on an undulating surface due to the flow of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 249, 557–596.Google Scholar
Beljaars, A. C. M., Walmsley, J. L. & Taylor, P. A. 1987 A mixed spectral finite difference model for neutrally-stratified boundary-layer flow over roughness change and topography. Boundary-Layer Met. 38, 273–303.Google Scholar
Chalikov, D. V. & Makin, V. K. 1991 Models of the wave boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Met. 56, 83–99.Google Scholar
Cheung, T. K. & Street, R. L. 1988 The turbulent layer in the water at an air-water interface. J. Fluid Mech. 194, 133–151.Google Scholar
Gent, P. R. 1977 A numerical model of the air flow above water waves. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 82, 349–369.Google Scholar
Gent, P. R. & Taylor, P.A. 1976 A numerical model of the air flow above waves. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 105–128.Google Scholar
Harris, J. A. 1992 On the growth of water waves and the motions beneath them. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Harris, J. A. & Street, R. L. 1994 Numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a moving wavy boundary: Norris and Reynolds extended. Phys. Fluids 6, 924–943.Google Scholar
Harris, J. A. & Street, R. L. 1991 Solution of coupled mean flow profiles for a stratified two-phase flow using the k-epsilon turbulence model. In Proc. Fourth Intl Symp. on Computational Fluid Dynamics, Davis, California.
Hsu, C. T., Hsu, E. Y. & Street, R. L. 1981 On the structure of turbulent flows over a progressive water wave: theory and experiment in a transformed, wave-following coordinate system. J. Fluid Mech. 105, 87–117.Google Scholar
Hsu, C. T. & Hsu, E. Y. 1983 On the structure of turbulent flow over a progressive water wave: theory and experiment in a transformed wave-following coordinate system. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 131, 123–153.Google Scholar
Kondo, J. 1976 Parameterization of turbulent transport in the top meter of the ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 6, 712–720.Google Scholar
Launder, B. E. & Sharma, B. I. 1974 Application of the energy dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of a flow near a spinning disk. Lett. Heat Mass Transfer 1, 131–138.Google Scholar
Launder, B. E., Reece, G. T. & Rodi, W. 1975 The development of a Reynolds stress turbulent closure. J. Fluid Mech. 68, 537–566.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1957 on the generation of surface waves by shear flows J. fluid mech. 3, 185–204.
Newley, T. M. J. 1986 Turbulent air flow over low hills. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
Norris, H. L. & Reynolds, W. C. 1975 Turbulent channel flow with a moving wavy boundary. Tech. Rep. TF-7. Dept. of Mechanical Engng, Stanford University.
Patel, V. C., Rodi, W. & Scheuerer, G. 1985 Turbulence models for near-wall and low Reynolds number flows: A review. AIAA J. 23, 1308–1319.Google Scholar
Riley, D. S., Donelan, M. A. & Hui, W. H. 1982 An extended Miles’ theory for wave generation by wind. Boundary-Layer Met. 22, 209–225.Google Scholar
Shemdin, O. H. 1976 Momentum transfer at the air-water interface. AIChE, Symp. on Transport Processes in Lakes and Oceans, Atlantic City, 263–284.
Snyder, R. L., Dobson, F. W., Elliot, J. A. & Long, R. B. 1981 Array measurements of atmospheric pressure fluctuations above surface gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 102, 1–59.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1972 Flow in a deep turbulent boundary layer over a surface distorted by water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 55, 719–735.
Townsend, A. A. 1980 Sheared turbulence and additional distortion. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 171–191.
Walmsley, J. L., Taylor, P. A. & Keith, T. 1986 A simple model of neutrally stratified boundary layer flow over complex terrain with surface roughness modulations (MS3DJH/3R). Boundary-Layer Met. 36, 157–186.Google Scholar
Wood, N. & Mason, P. J. 1993 The pressure force induced by neutral turbulent flow over hills. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 119, 1233–1267.
Xu, D. & Taylor, P. A. 1995 Boundary-Layer parameterisation of drag over smallscale topography. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 121, 433–443.Google Scholar
Zilker, D. P. & Hanratty, T. J. 1979 Influence of the amplitude of a solid wavy wall on a turbulent flow. Part 2. Separated flows. J. Fluid Mech. 90, 257–271.Google Scholar