Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T14:38:00.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The leading edge of an oil slick, soap film, or bubble stagnant cap in Stokes flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

J. F. Harper
J. F. Harper
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Trace impurities often collect on the upstream side of an obstacle in the surface of flowing liquid. The transition from practically free surface to surface sufficiently clogged to be treated as stationary can be quite sharp. The viscous flow underneath is nonlinearly coupled to the convective mass transfer of surface-active material. For two-dimensional flow at high Reynolds number the first observations were due to Thoreau, Langton and Reynolds over 100 years ago, and the theory was given by Harper & Dixon in 1974. If the whole problem is considered from a frame of reference moving with the stream instead of fixed to the downstream surface film, the solution refers to the leading edge of a slowly spreading oil slick.

The present work gives the theory corresponding to Harper & Dixon's for low Reynolds numbers (Stokes flow), for which there is a very simple leading approximation near the transition for a soluble surfactant, and a more complicated one, which can still be found exactly, for an insoluble surfactant which spreads onto clear liquid by surface diffusion. In both cases the surface remains flat: the ridge often observed is not a Stokes flow phenomenon.

The results are used to clarify the circumstances in which Savic's stagnant-cap approximation is useful for a bubble rising in a viscous liquid: the rear stagnation point now plays the role of the obstacle in the surface, and the flow near the surface transition can be treated locally as if it were two-dimensional instead of axisymmetric.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 237 , April 1992 , pp. 23 - 32
Copyright
© 1992 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1970 Handbook of Mathematical Functions, 9th printing. Dover.
Adam, N. K. 1968 The Physics and Chemistry of Surfaces. Dover.
Botta, E. F. F. & Djikstra, D. 1970 An improved numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations for the laminar flow past a semi-infinite flat plate. Rep. Math. Inst. Univ. Groningen TW-80.Google Scholar
Carrier, C. F. & Lin, C. C. 1948 On the nature of the boundary layer near the leading edge of a flat plat. Q. Appl. Maths 6, 63–68.Google Scholar
Conti, R. & Van Dyke, M. 1969 Inviscid reacting flow near a stagnation point. J. Fluid Mech. 35, 799–813.Google Scholar
Davis, R. E. & Acrivos, A. 1966 The influence of surfactants on the creeping motion of bubbles. Chem. Engng Sci. 21, 681–685.Google Scholar
Di Pietro, N. D. 1975 The motion of oil slicks on a calm sea. MSc dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.
Di Pietro, N. D. & Cox, R. G. 1980 The containment of an oil slick by a boom placed across a uniform stream. J. Fluid Mech. 96, 613–640.Google Scholar
Di Pietro, N. D., Huh, C. & Cox, R. G. 1978 The hydrodynamics of the spreading of one liquid on the surface of another. J. Fluid Mech. 84, 529–549.Google Scholar
Guggenheim, E. A. 1957 Thermodynamics, 3rd edn. North-Holland.
Harper, J. F. 1972 The motion of bubbles and drops through liquids. Adv. Appl. Mech. 12, 59–129.Google Scholar
Harper, J. F. 1973 On bubbles with small adsorbed films rising in liquids at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 58, 539–545.Google Scholar
Harper, J. F. & Dixon, J. N. 1974 The leading edge of a surface film on contaminated flowing water. Proc. Fifth Australasian Conf. Hydraulics Fluid Mech., Christchurch, NZ vol. 2, pp. 499–505.Google Scholar
Langton, J. 1872 Ripples and waves. Nature 5, 241–242.Google Scholar
Lerner, L. 1985 The interaction of surface-contaminated drops in Stokes flow. MSc thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, NZ
Lerner, L. & Harper, J. F. 1991 Stokes flow past a pair of stagnant-cap bubbles. J. Fluid Mech. 232, 167–190.Google Scholar
Levich, V. G. 1962 Physicochemical Hydrodynamics. Prentice-Hall.
Reynolds, O. 1881 On surface-tension and capillary action. Rep. Br. Ass. Adv. Sci. 51, 524–525.Google Scholar
Sadhal, S. S. & Johnson, R. E. 1983 Stokes flow past bubbles and drops partially coated with thin films. Part 1. Stagnant cap of surfactant film - exact solution. J. Fluid Mech. 126, 237–250.Google Scholar
Savic, P. 1953 Circulation and distortion of liquid drops falling through a viscous medium. Nat. Res. Counc. Can., Div. Mech. Engng Rep. MT-22.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. 1982 Flow beneath a stagnant film on water: the Reynolds ridge. J. Fluid Mech. 116, 283–296.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, M. 1975 Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics, annotated edn. Stanford, CA: Parabolic.
Vooren, A. I. van de & Dijkstra, D. 1970 The Navier-Stokes solution for laminar flow past a semi-infinite flat plate. J. Engng Maths 4, 9–27.Google Scholar