Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T22:21:26.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory experiments on counter-propagating collisions of solitary waves. Part 1. Wave interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2014

Yongshuai Chen  and
Harry Yeh
Yongshuai Chen
Affiliation:
School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-3212, USA
Harry Yeh*
Affiliation:
School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-3212, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: harry@engr.orst.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Collisions of counter-propagating solitary waves are investigated experimentally. Precision measurements of water-surface profiles are made with the use of the laser induced fluorescence (LIF) technique. During the collision, the maximum wave amplitude exceeds that calculated by the superposition of the incident solitary waves, and agrees well with both the asymptotic prediction of Su & Mirie (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 98, 1980, pp. 509–525) and the numerical simulation of Craig et al. (Phys. Fluids, vol. 18, 2006, 057106). The collision causes attenuation in wave amplitude: the larger the wave, the greater the relative reduction in amplitude. The collision also leaves imprints on the interacting waves with phase shifts and small dispersive trailing waves. Maxworthy’s (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 76, 1976, pp. 177–185) experimental results show that the phase shift is independent of incident wave amplitude. On the contrary, our laboratory results exhibit the dependence of wave amplitude that is in support of Su & Mirie’s theory. Though the dispersive trailing waves are very small and transient, the measured amplitude and wavelength are in good agreement with Su & Mirie’s theory. Furthermore, we investigate the symmetric head-on collision of the highest waves possible in our laboratory. Our laboratory results show that the runup and rundown of the collision are not simple reversible processes. The rundown motion causes penetration of the water surface below the still-water level. This penetration causes the post-collision waveform to be asymmetric, with each departing wave tilting slightly backward with respect to the direction of its propagation; the penetration is also the origin of the secondary dispersive trailing wavetrain. The present work extends the studies of head-on collisions to oblique collisions. The theory of Su & Mirie, which was developed only for head-on collisions, predicts well in oblique collision cases, which suggests that the obliqueness of the collision may not be important for this ‘weak’ interaction process.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: Shallow water flows Waves/Free-surface Flows: Solitary waves Waves/Free-surface Flows: Waves/Free-surface Flows
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 749 , 25 June 2014 , pp. 577 - 596
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ablowitz, M. J. & Segur, H. 1981 Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Transform. SIAM.Google Scholar
Byatt-Smith, J. G. B. 1971 An integral equation for unsteady surface waves and a comment on the Boussinesq equation. J. Fluid Mech. 49, 625–633.Google Scholar
Chambarel, J., Kharif, C. & Touboul, J. 2009 Head-on collision of two solitary waves and residual falling jet formation. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 16, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, R. K. C. & Street, R. L. 1970 A computer study of finite-amplitude water waves. J. Comput. Phys. 6, 68–94.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Zhang, E. & Yeh, H.2014 Laboratory experiments on counter-propagating head-on collisions of solitary waves. Part 2: flow field. J. Fluid Mech. (submitted).Google Scholar
Cooker, M. J., Weidman, P. D. & Bale, D. S. 1997 Reflection of a high amplitude solitary wave at a vertical wall. J. Fluid Mech. 342, 141–158.Google Scholar
Craig, W., Guyenne, P., Hammack, J., Henderson, D. & Sulem, C. 2006 Solitary water wave interactions. Phys. Fluids 18, 057106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diorio, J. D., Liu, X. & Duncan, J. H. 2009 An experimental investigation of incipient spilling breakers. J. Fluid Mech. 633, 271–283.Google Scholar
Duncan, J. H., Philomin, V., Behres, M. & Kimmel, J. 1994 The formation of spilling breaking water waves. Phys. Fluids 6, 2558–2560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, J. H., Qiao, H., Philomin, V. & Wenz, A. 1999 Gentle spilling breakers: crest profile evolution. J. Fluid Mech. 379, 191–222.Google Scholar
Fenton, J. & Rienecker, M. 1982 Fourier method for solving nonlinear water-wave problems: application to solitary-wave interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 118, 411–443.Google Scholar
Goring, D. & Raichlen, F. 1980 The generation of long waves in the laboratory. In Proceedings 17th International Conference on Coastal Engineering, Sydney, Australia (ed. Edge, B. L.), ASCE.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, R. 1971 The solitary wave in water of variable depth. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 46, 611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammack, J., Henderson, D., Guyenne, P. & Yi, M. 2004 Solitary-wave collisions. Phys. Fluids 18, 057106.Google Scholar
Li, W.2012 Amplification of solitary waves along a vertical wall. PhD thesis, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
Li, W., Yeh, H. & Kodama, Y. 2011 On the Mach reflection of a solitary wave: revisited. J. Fluid Mech. 672, 326–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X. & Duncan, J. H. 2006 An experimental study of surfactant effects on spilling breakers. J. Fluid Mech. 567, 433–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxworthy, T. 1976 Experiments on collisions between solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 76, 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsden, J. D.1993 Tsunamis: forces on a vertical wall caused by long waves, bores, and surges on a dry bed. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Renouard, D., Santos, F. & Temperville, A. 1985 Experimental study of the generation, damping, and reflexion of a solitary wave. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 9, 341–358.Google Scholar
Su, C. & Mirie, R. M. 1980 On head-on collisions between two solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 509–525.Google Scholar
Tanaka, M. 1993 Mach reflection of a large-amplitude solitary wave. J. Fluid Mech. 248, 637–661.Google Scholar
Weidman, P. & Maxworthy, T. 1978 Experiments on strong interactions between solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 85, 417–431.Google Scholar
Yeh, H. & Ghazali, A. 1986 A bore on a uniformly sloping beach. In Proceedings 20th International Conference on Coastal Engineering (ed. Edge, B. L.), pp. 877–888. ASCE.Google Scholar
Zabusky, N. J. & Kruskal, M. D. 1965 Interaction of ‘solitons’ in a collisionless plasma and the recurrence of initial states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 240–243.Google Scholar