Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T20:07:12.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inertial migration of spherical and oblate particles in straight ducts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2017

Iman Lashgari*
Affiliation:
Linné FLOW Centre and SeRC (Swedish e-Science Research Centre), KTH Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Mehdi Niazi Ardekani
Affiliation:
Linné FLOW Centre and SeRC (Swedish e-Science Research Centre), KTH Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Indradumna Banerjee
Affiliation:
Division of Proteomics and Nanobiotechnology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Aman Russom
Affiliation:
Division of Proteomics and Nanobiotechnology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Luca Brandt
Affiliation:
Linné FLOW Centre and SeRC (Swedish e-Science Research Centre), KTH Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
*
Email address for correspondence: imanl@mech.kth.se

Abstract

We study numerically the inertial migration of a single rigid sphere and an oblate spheroid in straight square and rectangular ducts. A highly accurate interface-resolved numerical algorithm is employed to analyse the entire migration dynamics of the oblate particle and compare it with that of the sphere. Similarly to the inertial focusing of spheres, the oblate particle reaches one of the four face-centred equilibrium positions, however they are vertically aligned with the axis of symmetry in the spanwise direction. In addition, the lateral trajectories of spheres and oblates collapse into an equilibrium manifold before ending at the equilibrium positions, with the equilibrium manifold tangential to lines of constant background shear for both sphere and oblate particles. The differences between the migration of the oblate and sphere are also presented, in particular the oblate may focus on the diagonal symmetry line of the duct cross-section, close to one of the corners, if its diameter is larger than a certain threshold. Moreover, we show that the final orientation and rotation of the oblate exhibit chaotic behaviour for Reynolds numbers beyond a critical value. Finally, we document that the lateral motion of the oblate particle is less uniform than that of the spherical particle due to its evident tumbling motion throughout the migration. In a square duct, the strong tumbling motion of the oblate in the first stage of the migration results in a lower lateral velocity and consequently longer focusing length with respect to that of the spherical particle. The opposite is true in a rectangular duct where the higher lateral velocity of the oblate in the second stage of the migration, with negligible tumbling, gives rise to shorter focusing lengths. These results can help the design of microfluidic systems for bioapplications.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amini, H., Lee, W. & Di Carlo, D. 2014 Inertial microfluidic physics. Lab on a Chip 14, 27392761.Google Scholar
Ardekani, M. N., Costa, P., Breugem, W.-P. & Brandt, L. 2016 Numerical study of the sedimentation of spheroidal particles. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 87, 1634.Google Scholar
Ardekani, M. N., Costa, P., Breugem, W.-P., Picano, F. & Brandt, L. 2017 Drag reduction in turbulent channel flow laden with finite-size oblate spheroids. J. Fluid Mech. 816, 4370.Google Scholar
Asmolov, E. S. 1999 The inertial lift on a spherical particle in a plane Poiseuille flow at large channel Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 381, 6387.Google Scholar
Berthet, H., Fermigier, M. & Lindner, A. 2013 Single fiber transport in a confined channel: microfluidic experiments and numerical study. Phys. Fluids 25 (10), 103601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagat, A. A., Kuntaegowdanahalli, S. S. & Papautsky, I. 2008 Enhanced particle filtration in straight microchannels using shear-modulated inertial migration. Phys. Fluids 20, 101702.Google Scholar
Breugem, W.-P. 2012 A second-order accurate immersed boundary method for fully resolved simulations of particle-laden flows. J. Comput. Phys. 231, 44694498.Google Scholar
Choi, Y.-S., Seo, K.-W. & Lee, S.-J. 2011 Lateral and cross-lateral focusing of spherical particles in a square microchannel. Lab on a Chip 11, 460465.Google Scholar
Chun, B. & Ladd, J. C. 2006 Inertial migration of neutrally buoyant particles in a square duct: an investigation of multiple equilibrium positions. Phys. Fluids 18, 031704.Google Scholar
Ciftlik, A. T., Ettori, M. & Gijs, M. A. M. 2013 High throughput-per-footprint inertial focusing. Nano Small Micro 9, 27642773.Google Scholar
Costa, P., Boersma, B. J., Westerweel, J. & Breugem, W.-P. 2015 Collision model for fully-resolved simulations of flows laden with finite-size particles. Phys. Rev. E 92, 053012.Google Scholar
Di Carlo, D., Edd, J. F., Humphry, K. J., Stone, H. A. & Toner, M. 2009 Particle segregation and dynamics in confined flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 094503.Google Scholar
Di Carlo, D., Irimia, D., Tompkins, R. G. & Toner, M. 2007 Continuous inertial focusing, ordering, and separation of particles in microchannels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 48.Google Scholar
Ding, E.-J. & Aidun, C. K. 2000 The dynamics and scaling law for particles suspended in shear flow with inertia. J. Fluid Mech. 432, 317344.Google Scholar
Fornari, W., Picano, F. & Brandt, L. 2016 Sedimentation of finite-size spheres in quiescent and turbulent environments. J. Fluid Mech. 788, 640669.Google Scholar
Ho, B. P. & Leal, L. G. 1974 Inertial migration of rigid spheres in two-dimensional unidirectional flows. J. Fluid Mech. 65, 365400.Google Scholar
Hood, K., Lee, S. & Rope, M. 2015 Inertial migration of a rigid sphere in three-dimensional Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 765, 452479.Google Scholar
Hur, S. C., Choi, S.-E., Kwon, S. & Di Carlo, D. 2011 Inertial focusing of non-spherical microparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 044101.Google Scholar
Jeffery, G. B. 1922 The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 102, 161179.Google Scholar
Lambert, R. A., Picano, F., Breugem, W. P. & Brandt, L. 2013 Active suspensions in thin films: nutrient uptake and swimmer motion. J. Fluid Mech. 733, 528557.Google Scholar
Lashgari, I., Picano, F., Breugem, W.-P. & Brandt, L. 2014 Laminar, turbulent and inertial shear-thickening regimes in channel flow of neutrally buoyant particle suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 254502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, C., Hu, G., Jiang, X. & Sun, J. 2015 Inertial focusing of spherical particles in rectangular microchannels over a wide range of Reynolds numbers. Lab on a Chip 15, 1168.Google Scholar
Martel, J. M. & Toner, M. 2014 Inertial focusing in microfluidics. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Engng 16, 371396.Google Scholar
Masaeli, M., Sollier, E., Amini, H., Mao, W., Camacho, K., Doshi, N., Mitragotri, S., Alexeev, A. & Di Calro, D. 2012 Continuous inertial focusing and separation of particles by shape. Phys. Rev. X 2, 031017.Google Scholar
Matas, J.-P., Morris, J. F. & Guazzelli, É. 2004a Inertial migration of rigid spherical particles in Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 515, 171195.Google Scholar
Matas, J.-P., Morris, J. F. & Guazzelli, É. 2004b Lateral forces on a sphere. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP 59, 5970.Google Scholar
Matas, J.-P., Morris, J. F. & Guazzelli, É. 2009 Lateral force on a rigid sphere in large-inertia laminar pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 621, 5967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittal, R. & Iaccarino, G. 2005 Immersed boundary method. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 239261.Google Scholar
Miura, K., Itano, T. & Sugihara-Seki, M. 2014 Inertial migration of neutrally spheres in a pressure-driven flow through square channels. J. Fluid Mech. 749, 320330.Google Scholar
Pham, J. T., Morozov, A., Crosby, A. J., Lindner, A. & du Roure, O. 2015 Deformation and shape of flexible, microscale helices in viscous flow. Phys. Rev. E 92 (1), 011004.Google ScholarPubMed
Picano, F., Breugem, W.-P. & Brandt, L. 2015 Turbulent channel flow of dense suspensions of neutrally-buoyant spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 764, 463487.Google Scholar
Prohm, C. & Stark, H. 2014 Feedback control of inertial microfluidics using axial control forces. Lab on a Chip 14, 2115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, T., Do-Quang, M., Aidun, C. K. & Lundell, F. 2015 Effect of fluid and particle inertia on the rotation of an oblate spheroidal particle suspended in linear shear flow. Phys. Rev. E 91, 053017.Google Scholar
Rubinow, S. I. & Keller, J. B. 1961 The transverse force on a spinning sphere moving in a viscous fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 11, 447459.Google Scholar
Saffman, P. G. 1965 The lift on a small sphere in a slow shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 385400.Google Scholar
Schonberg, J. A. & Hinch, E. J. 1989 Inertial migration of a sphere in Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 203, 517524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segré, G. & Silberberg, A. 1961 Radial particle displacements in Poiseuille flow of suspensions. Nature 189, 209210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segre, G. & Silberberg, A. 1962 Behavior of macroscopic rigid spheres in Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 136157.Google Scholar
Uhlmann, M. 2005 An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for simulation of particulate flow. J. Comput. Phys. 209, 448476.Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Giridhar, P. V., Kasperb, S. & Papautsky, I. 2013 Modulation of aspect ratio for complete separation in an inertial microfluidic channel. Lab on a Chip 13, 1919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J. & Papautsky, I. 2013 Fundamentals of inertial focusing in microchannels. Lab on a Chip 13, 1121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, L., Rorai, C., Mitra, D. & Brandt, L. 2014 A microfluidic device to sort capsules by deformability: a numerical study. Soft Matt. 10, 7705.Google Scholar