Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T23:51:09.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enstrophy production and flow topology in compressible isotropic turbulence with vibrational non-equilibrium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Qinmin Zheng
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, Guangdong-HongKong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Data-Driven Fluid Mechanics and Engineering Applications, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, PR China Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, PR China
Yan Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, Guangdong-HongKong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Data-Driven Fluid Mechanics and Engineering Applications, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, PR China Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, PR China
Jianchun Wang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, Guangdong-HongKong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Data-Driven Fluid Mechanics and Engineering Applications, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, PR China Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, PR China
Shiyi Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, Guangdong-HongKong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Data-Driven Fluid Mechanics and Engineering Applications, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, PR China Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, PR China State Key Laboratory of Turbulence and Complex Systems, Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR China
*
Email address for correspondence: wangjc@sustech.edu.cn

Abstract

Enstrophy production and flow topology are numerically investigated for statistically stationary compressible isotropic turbulence in vibrational non-equilibrium with a large-scale thermal forcing. The net enstrophy production term is decomposed into solenoidal, dilatational and isotropic dilatational terms based on the Helmholtz decomposition. From the full flow field perspective, the net enstrophy production mainly stems from the solenoidal term. For the dilatational and isotropic dilatational terms, although their local magnitudes can be considerable, the positive values in the compression region and the negative values in the expansion region cancel out on average. For the solenoidal component of the deviatoric strain-rate tensor, the statistical properties of its eigenvalues and alignments between vorticity and its eigenvectors are nearly independent of the local dilatation and vibrational relaxation. The solenoidal components of enstrophy production along three eigendirections are thus mainly affected by the vorticity. For the dilatational component of deviatoric strain-rate tensor, the statistical properties of its eigenvalues and alignments between vorticity and its eigenvectors closely relate to the local dilatation and vibrational relaxation. The dilatational components of enstrophy production along three eigendirections are therefore affected by the vorticity, eigenvalues and alignments between the vorticity and eigenvectors. The topological classification proposed by Chong et al. (Phys. Fluids, vol. 2, issue 5, 1990, pp. 765–777) is employed to decompose the flow field into various flow topologies. In the strong compression and strong expansion regions, the relaxation effects on the volume fractions of flow topologies and their relative contributions to the local enstrophy production are significant.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J.D. Jr. 2006 Hypersonic and High-Temperature Gas Dynamics. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashurst, W.T., Kerstein, A.R., Kerr, R.M. & Gibson, C.H. 1987 Alignment of vorticity and scalar gradient with strain rate in simulated Navier–Stokes turbulence. Phys. Fluids 30 (8), 23432353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balsara, D.S. & Shu, C.-W. 2000 Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy. J. Comput. Phys. 160 (2), 405452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijlard, M.J., Oliemans, R.V.A., Portela, L.M. & Ooms, G. 2010 Direct numerical simulation analysis of local flow topology in a particle-laden turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 653, 3556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, H.M., Mansour, N.N. & Cantwell, B.J. 1996 Topology of fine-scale motions in turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 310, 269292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buaria, D., Bodenschatz, E. & Pumir, A. 2020 Vortex stretching and enstrophy production in high Reynolds number turbulence. Phys. Rev. Fluids 5 (10), 104602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candler, G.V. 2019 Rate effects in hypersonic flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51 (1), 379402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, D.W. & Coletti, F. 2018 Small-scale structure and energy transfer in homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 854, 505543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, M.S., Perry, A.E. & Cantwell, B.J. 1990 A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields. Phys. Fluids A 2 (5), 765777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, M.S., Soria, J., Perry, A.E., Chacin, J., Cantwell, B.J. & Na, Y. 1998 Turbulence structures of wall-bounded shear flows found using DNS data. J. Fluid Mech. 357, 225247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danish, M., Sinha, S.S. & Srinivasan, B. 2016 Influence of compressibility on the lagrangian statistics of vorticity–strain-rate interactions. Phys. Rev. E 94 (1), 013101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donzis, D. & Jagannathan, S. 2013 Fluctuations of thermodynamic variables in stationary compressible turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 733, 221244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donzis, D.A. & Maqui, A.F. 2016 Statistically steady states of forced isotropic turbulence in thermal equilibrium and non-equilibrium. J. Fluid Mech. 797, 181200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlebacher, G. & Sarkar, S. 1993 Statistical analysis of the rate of strain tensor in compressible homogeneous turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 5 (12), 32403254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiévet, R. & Raman, V. 2018 Effect of vibrational nonequilibrium on isolator shock structure. J. Propul. Power 34 (5), 13341344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, S. & Shu, C.-W. 1998 Total variation diminishing Runge–Kutta schemes. Math. Comput. 67 (221), 7385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlington, P.E., Schumacher, J. & Dahm, W.J.A. 2008 Local and nonlocal strain rate fields and vorticity alignment in turbulent flows. Phys. Rev. E 77 (2), 026303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khurshid, S. & Donzis, D.A. 2019 Decaying compressible turbulence with thermal non-equilibrium. Phys. Fluids 31 (1), 015103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knisely, C.P. & Zhong, X. 2020 Impact of vibrational nonequilibrium on the supersonic mode in hypersonic boundary layers. AIAA J. 58 (4), 17041714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K., Girimaji, S.S. & Kerimo, J. 2009 Effect of compressibility on turbulent velocity gradients and small-scale structure. J. Turbul. 10, N9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lele, S.K. 1992 Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 103 (1), 1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüthi, B., Tsinober, A. & Kinzelbach, W. 2005 Lagrangian measurement of vorticity dynamics in turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 528, 87118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meneveau, C. 2011 Lagrangian dynamics and models of the velocity gradient tensor in turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 219245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nomura, K.K. & Diamessis, P.J. 2000 The interaction of vorticity and rate-of-strain in homogeneous sheared turbulence. Phys. Fluids 12 (4), 846864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nomura, K.K. & Post, G.K. 1998 The structure and dynamics of vorticity and rate of strain in incompressible homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 377, 6597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ooi, A., Martin, J., Soria, J. & Chong, M.S. 1999 A study of the evolution and characteristics of the invariants of the velocity-gradient tensor in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 381, 141174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papapostolou, V., Wacks, D.H., Chakraborty, N., Klein, M. & Im, H.G. 2017 Enstrophy transport conditional on local flow topologies in different regimes of premixed turbulent combustion. Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 11545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parashar, N., Sinha, S.S. & Srinivasan, B. 2019 Lagrangian investigations of velocity gradients in compressible turbulence: lifetime of flow-field topologies. J. Fluid Mech. 872, 492514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, M.R. & Livescu, D. 2010 Forcing for statistically stationary compressible isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 22 (11), 116101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirozzoli, S. & Grasso, F. 2004 Direct numerical simulations of isotropic compressible turbulence: influence of compressibility on dynamics and structures. Phys. Fluids 16 (12), 43864407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samtaney, R., Pullin, D.I. & Kosović, B. 2001 Direct numerical simulation of decaying compressible turbulence and shocklet statistics. Phys. Fluids 13 (5), 14151430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Silva, C.B. & Pereira, J.C.F. 2008 Invariants of the velocity-gradient, rate-of-strain, and rate-of-rotation tensors across the turbulent/nonturbulent interface in jets. Phys. Fluids 20 (5), 055101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suman, S. & Girimaji, S.S. 2010 Velocity gradient invariants and local flow-field topology in compressible turbulence. J. Turbul. 11, N2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsinober, A., Kit, E. & Dracos, T. 1992 Experimental investigation of the field of velocity gradients in turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 242, 169192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaghefi, N.S. & Madnia, C.K. 2015 Local flow topology and velocity gradient invariants in compressible turbulent mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 774, 6794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincenti, W.G. & Kruger, C.H. 1965 Introduction to Physical Gas Dynamics. Wiley.Google Scholar
Wallace, J.M. 2009 Twenty years of experimental and direct numerical simulation access to the velocity gradient tensor: what have we learned about turbulence? Phys. Fluids 21 (2), 021301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Shi, Y., Wang, L.-P., Xiao, Z., He, X. & Chen, S. 2011 Effect of shocklets on the velocity gradients in highly compressible isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 23 (12), 125103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Shi, Y., Wang, L.-P., Xiao, Z., He, X.T. & Chen, S. 2012 Effect of compressibility on the small-scale structures in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 713, 588631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Wan, M., Chen, S., Xie, C., Wang, L.-P. & Chen, S. 2019 Cascades of temperature and entropy fluctuations in compressible turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 867, 195215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Wan, M., Chen, S., Xie, C., Zheng, Q., Wang, L.-P. & Chen, S. 2020 Effect of flow topology on the kinetic energy flux in compressible isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 883, A11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Wang, L.-P., Xiao, Z., Shi, Y. & Chen, S. 2010 A hybrid numerical simulation of isotropic compressible turbulence. J. Comput. Phys. 229 (13), 52575279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L. & Lu, X.-Y. 2012 Flow topology in compressible turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 703, 255278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Q., Wang, J., Alam, M.M., Noack, B.R., Li, H., Wan, M. & Chen, S. 2021 Transfer of internal energy fluctuation in compressible isotropic turbulence with vibrational nonequilibrium. J. Fluid Mech. 883, A26.Google Scholar
Zheng, Q., Wang, J., Noack, B.R., Li, H., Wan, M. & Chen, S. 2020 Vibrational relaxation in compressible isotropic turbulence with thermal nonequilibrium. Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 044602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Nagata, K., Sakai, Y., Ito, Y. & Hayase, T. 2016 Enstrophy production and dissipation in developing grid-generated turbulence. Phys. Fluids 28 (2), 025113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar