Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T23:06:58.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emendation of the Brown & Michael equation, with application to sound generation by vortex motion near a half-plane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

M. S. Howe
M. S. Howe
Affiliation:
Boston University, College of Engineering, 110 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A reappraisal is made of the Brown & Michael (1954, 1955) equation that is widely used to model high-Reynolds-number vortex shedding in two dimensions by rectilinear vortices of time-dependent circulations. It is concluded that the equation introduces an unbalanced and unacceptable surface force that can significantly influence predicted flow characteristics. A corrected equation is derived which removes this force, and is applied to determine the sound generated at low Mach numbers when a line vortex translates around the edge of a rigid half-plane. The solution of this problem in the absence of vortex shedding (Crighton 1972) is extended by permitting shedding to occur at the edge in accordance with the unsteady Kutta condition. The shed vorticity is assumed to roll-up into a concentrated core whose motion is calculated by both the emended and original Brown & Michael equations. The two models exhibit large qualitative differences in the predicted wake flow near the edge; both predict significant reductions in the radiated sound, but the reduction is smaller by about 4 dB for the emended Brown & Michael equation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 329 , 25 December 1996 , pp. 89 - 101
Copyright
© 1996 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, C. E. & Michael, W. H. 1954 Effect of leading edge separation on the lift of a delta wing. J. Aero. Sci. 21, 690–706.Google Scholar
Brown, C. E. & Michael, W. H. 1955 On slender deka wings with leading-edge separation. NACA Tech. Note 3430.Google Scholar
Chandiramani, K. L. 1974 Diffraction of evanescent waves, with applications to aerodynamically scattered sound and radiation from unbaffled plates. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55, 19–29.Google Scholar
Chase, D. M. 1972 Sound radiated by turbulent flow off a rigid half-plane as obtained from a wavevector spectrum of hydrodynamic pressure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52, 1011–1023.Google Scholar
Chase, D. M. 1975 Noise radiated from an edge in turbuient flow. AIAA J. 13, 1041–1047.Google Scholar
Clements, R. R. 1973 An inviscid model of two-dimensional vortex shedding. J. Fluid Mech. 57, 321–336.Google Scholar
Cortelezzi, L. & Leonard, A. 1993 Point vortex model for the unsteady separated flow past a semi-infinite plate with transverse motion. Fluid. Dyn. Res. 11, 263–295.Google Scholar
Cortelezzi, L., Leonard, A. & Doyle, J. C. 1994 An example of active circulation control of the unsteady separated flow past a semi-infinite plate. J. Fluid Mech. 260, 127–154.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. G. 1972 Radiation from vortex filament motion near a half plane. J. Fluid Mech. 51, 357–362.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. G. & Leppington, F. G. 1970 Scattering of aerodynamic noise by a semi-infinite compliant plate. J. Fluid Mech. 43, 721–736.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. G. & LeppingtoN, F. G. 1971 On the scattering of aerodynamic noise. J. Fluid Mech. 46, 577–597.Google Scholar
Curle, N. 1955 The influence of solid boundaries upon aerodynamic sound. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 231, 505–514.Google Scholar
Dore, B. D. 1966 Nonlinear theory for slender wings in sudden plunging motion. Aeronaut. Q. 17, 187–200.Google Scholar
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. & Hall, L. H. 1970 Aerodynamic sound generation by turbulent flow in the vicinity of a scattering half-plane. J. Fluid Mech. 40, 657–670.Google Scholar
Graham, J. M. R. 1980 The forces on the sharp-edged cylinders in oscillatory flow at low Keulegan-Carpenter numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 97, 331–346.Google Scholar
Howe, M. S. 1975 Contributions to the theory of aerodynamic sound, with application to excess jet noise and the theory of the flute. J. Fluid Mech. 71, 625–673.Google Scholar
Howe, M. S. 1989 On unsteady surface forces, and sound produced by the normal chopping of a rectilinear vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 206, 131–153.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1952 On sound generated aerodynamically. Part I: General theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 211, 564–587.Google Scholar
Lowson, M. V. 1963 The separated flow on slender wings in unsteady motion. Reports & Memoranda of the Aeronautical Research Council, no. 3448.
Mangler, K. W. & Smith, J. H. B. 1959 A theory for the flow past a slender delta wing with leading edge separation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 251, 200–217.Google Scholar
Morse, P. M. & Feshbach, H. 1953 Methods of Theoretical Physics, vols. 1 and 2. McGraw-Hill.
Peters, M. C. A. M. 1993 Aeroacoustic sources in internal flows. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology.
Peters, M. C. A. M. & Hirschberg, A. 1993 Acoustically induced periodic vortex shedding at sharp edged open channel ends: simple vortex models. J. Sound Vib. 161, 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, D. G. 1966 Oscillating slender wings with leading edge separation. Aeronaut. Q. 17, 311–331.Google Scholar
Rott, N. 1956 Diffraction of a weak shock with vortex generation. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 111–128.Google Scholar
Smith, J. H. B. 1959 A theory of the separated flow from the curved leading edge of a slender wing. Reports & Memoranda of the Aeronautical Research Council, no. 3116.
Smith, J. H. B. 1968 Improved calculations of leading edge separation from slender, thin, delta wings. Proc. R. Soc. A 306, 67–90.Google Scholar
Tavares, T. S. & McCune, J. E. 1993 Aerodynamics of maneuvering slender wings with leading edge separation AIAA J. 31, 977–986.Google Scholar