Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T21:52:29.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bubbly flow model for the dynamic characteristics of cavitating pumps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2006

Christopher Brennen
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena

Abstract

This paper is concerned with understanding the dynamic behaviour of cavitating hydraulic machines during unsteady or transient operation. The linear transfer matrices which relate the small fluctuating pressures and mass flow rates at inlet and discharge are functions not only of the frequency but also of the mean operating state of the machine, especially the degree of cavitation. The recent experimental transfer matrices obtained by Ng & Brennen (1978) for some axial flow pumps revealed some dynamic characteristics which were unaccounted for by any existing theoretical analysis; their visual observations suggested that the bubbly cavitating flow in the blade passages could be responsible for these effects.

A theoretical model of the dynamic response of this bubbly blade-passage flow is described in the present paper. Void-fraction fluctuations in this flow result not only from pressure fluctuations but also because the fluctuating angle of attack causes fluctuations in the rate of production of bubbles near the leading edge. The latter causes kinematic waves which interact through the boundary conditions with the dynamic waves caused by pressure fluctuation. The resulting theoretical transfer functions which result are in good qualitative agreement with the experiments; with appropriate choices of two parameters (the practical values of which are difficult to assess) good quantitative agreement is also obtained. The theoretical model also provides one possible explanation of the observation that the pump changes from an essentially passive dynamic element in the absence of cavitation to a progressively more active element as the extent of cavitation increases.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1978 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D. A., Blade, R. J. & Stevens, W. 1971 Response of a radial-bladed centrifugal pump to sinusoidal disturbances for non-cavitating flow. N.A.S.A. Tech. Note D-6556.Google Scholar
Brennen, C. 1973 The dynamic behavior and compliance of a stream of cavitating bubbles. Trans. A.S.M.E., J. Fluids Engng 95, 533542.Google Scholar
Brennen, C. 1978 On the unsteady, dynamic response of phase changes in hydraulic systems. Proc. Int. Sem., Int. Cen. Heat Mass Transfer, Dubrovnik. Washington: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Brennen, C. & Acosta, A. J. 1973 Theoretical, quasi-static analysis of cavitation compliance in turbopumps. J. Spacecraft Rockets 10, 175180.Google Scholar
Brennen, C. & Acosta, A. J. 1976 The dynamic transfer function for a cavitating inducer. Trans. A.S.M.E., J. Fluids Engng 98, 182191.Google Scholar
Fanelli, M. 1972 Further considerations on the dynamic behavior of hydraulic turbo-machinery. Water Power, June 1972, pp. 208222.Google Scholar
Farrel, E. C. & Fenwick, J. R. 1973 POGO instabilities suppression evaluation. N.A.S.A. Rep. CR-134500.Google Scholar
Kamijyo, K., Suzuki, A., Shimura, T., Hashimoto, R., Watanabe, M., Watanabe, Y., Iwabuchi, T. & Mori, Y. 1975 Experimental investigation of small, high-speed, high-head liquid oxygen pump. Nat. Aerospace Lab. Japan Rep. TR–415.Google Scholar
Natanzon, M. S., Bl'Tsev, N. I., Bazhanov, V. V. & Leydervarger, M. R.1974 Experimental investigation of cavitation-induced oscillations of helical inducers. Fluid Mech., Sov. Res. 3, 3845.Google Scholar
Ng, S. L. 1976 Dynamic response of cavitating turbomachines. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena (See also Div. Engng Appl. Sci., Caltech, Rep. E184.1.)
Ng, S. L. & Brennen, C. 1978 Experiments on the dynamic behavior of cavitating pumps. Trans. A.S.M.E., J. Fluids Engng 100, 166176.Google Scholar
Ng, S. L., Brennen, C. & Acosta, A. J. 1976 The dynamics of cavitating inducer pumps. Proc. Int. Conf. Two Phase Flow Cavitation, Int. Assoc. Hyd. Res., Grenoble, pp. 383398.Google Scholar
Rubin, S. 1966 Longitudinal instability of liquid rockets due to propulsion feedback (POGO). J. Spacecraft Rockets 3, 11881195.Google Scholar
Rubin, S., Wagner, R. G. & Payne, J. G. 1973 POGO suppression on space shuttle – early studies. N.A.S.A. Rep. CR-2210.Google Scholar
Rundstadler, P. W. 1976 Review and analysis of state-of-the-art of multiphase pump technology. Electric Power Res. Inst., Palo Alto, Calif., Rep. NP-159.Google Scholar
Sack, L. E. & Nottage, H. B. 1965 System oscillations associated with cavitating inducers. J. Basic Engng D 87, 917925.Google Scholar
Stripling, L. B. & Acosta, A. J. 1962 Cavitation in turbopumps – Part I. J. Basic Engng D 84, 326338.Google Scholar
Vaage, R. D., Fidler, L. E. & Zehnle, R. A. 1972 Investigation of characteristics of feed system instabilities. Martin Marietta Corp., Denver, Colorado, Final Rep. MCR-72-107.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. G. 1971 Tital II engine transfer function test results. Aerospace Corp., El Segundo, Calif., Rep. TOR-0059 (G471)-9.Google Scholar
Young, W. E., Murphy, R. & Reddecliff, J. M. 1972 Study of cavitating inducer instabilities. Pratt Whitney Aircraft, Florida, R. & D. Center Rep. PWA FR-5131.Google Scholar