Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T10:08:46.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the derivation of the Navier–Stokes–alpha equations from Hamilton's principle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

A. M. SOWARD  and
P. H. ROBERTS
A. M. SOWARD
Affiliation:
Mathematics Research Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QE, UK
P. H. ROBERTS
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate the derivation of Euler's equation from Hamilton's variational principle for flows decomposed into their mean and fluctuating parts. Our particular concern is with the flow decomposition used in the derivation of the Navier–Stokes–α equation which expresses the fluctuating velocity in terms of the mean flow and a small fluctuating displacement. In the past the derivation has retained terms up to second order in the Lagrangian which is then averaged. The variation is effected by incrementing the mean velocity, while holding the moments of the products of the displacements fixed. The process leads to a mean Euler equation for the mean velocity. The Navier–Stokes–α equation is only obtained after making a further closure approximation, which is not the concern of this paper. Instead attention is restricted here to the exact analysis of Euler's equation. We show that a proper implementation of Hamilton's principle, which concerns the virtual variation of particle paths, can only be achieved when the fluctuating displacement and mean velocity are varied in concert. This leads to an exact form of Euler's equation. If, on the other hand, the displacement is held fixed under the variation, a term in Euler's equation is lost. Averaging that erroneous form provides the basis of the Navier–Stokes–α equation. We explore the implications of the correct mean equation, particularly with regard to Kelvin's circulation theorem, comparing it with the so called GLM and glm-equations.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 604 , 10 June 2008 , pp. 297 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, D. G. & McIntyre, M. E. 1978 a An exact theory of nonlinear waves on a Lagrangian-mean flow. J. Fluid Mech. 89, 609–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D. G. & McIntyre, M. E. 1978 b On wave action and its relatives. J. Fluid Mech. 89, 647–664; corrigendum, 95, 796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braginsky, S. I. 1964 Self-excitation of magnetic field during the motion of a highly conducting fluid. JETP 74, 1084–1098. (Engl. transl. Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1046–1471 (1965).)Google Scholar
Camassa, R. & Holm, D. D. 1993 An integrable shallow water equation with peaked solitons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1661–1664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foias, C., Holm, D. D. & Titi, E. S. 2001 The Navier-Stokes-alpha model of fluid turbulence. Physica D 152, 505–519.Google Scholar
Gjaja, I. & Holm, D. D. 1996 Self-consistent Hamiltonian dynamics of wave mean-flow interaction for a rotating stratified incompressible fluid. Physica D 98, 343–378.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. 1980 Classical Mechanics, 2nd Edn. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Holm, D. D. 1999 Fluctuation effects on 3D Lagrangian mean and Eulerian mean fluid motion. Physica D 133, 215–269.Google Scholar
Holm, D. D. 2002 a Lagrangian averages, averaged Lagrangians, and the mean effect of fluctuations in fluid dynamics. Chaos 12, 518–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holm, D. D. 2002 b Averaged Lagrangians and mean effects of fluctuations in ideal fluid dynamics. Physica D 170, 253–286.Google Scholar
Holm, D. D., Marsden, J. E. & Ratiu, T. S. 1998 The Euler–Poincaré equations and semidirect products with applications to continuum theories. Adv. Maths 137, 1–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, J. E. & Shkoller, S. 2003 The anisotropic Lagrangian averaged Euler and Navier-Stokes equations. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 166, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, P. H. & Soward, A. M. 2006 Eulerian and Lagrangian means in rotating, magnetohydrodynamic flows I. General results. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 100, 457–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soward, A. M. 1972 A kinematic theory of large magnetic Reynolds number dynamos. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 272, 431–462.Google Scholar
Tough, J. G. & Roberts, P. H. 1968 Nearly symmetric hydromagnetic dynamos. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 1, 288–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar