Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T13:15:25.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Negatively buoyant projectiles – from weak fountains to heavy vortices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2010

O. J. MYRTROEEN
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
G. R. HUNT*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: gary.hunt@imperial.ac.uk

Abstract

An experimental investigation to establish the maximum rise height zm attained by a finite volume of fluid forced impulsively vertically upwards against its buoyancy into quiescent surroundings of uniform density is described. In the absence of a density contrast, the release propagates as a vortex ring and the vertical trajectory is limited by viscous effects. On increasing the source density of the release, gravitational effects limit the trajectory and a maximum rise height zm is reached. For these negatively buoyant releases, the dependence of zm on the length L of the column of ejected fluid, nozzle diameter D (= 2r0), dispensing time and source reduced gravity is determined by injecting saline solution into a fresh-water environment. For 3.4 ≲ L/D ≲ 9.0, zm/r0 is shown to scale on the source parameter η = Fr(L/D), a product of the source Froude number Fr and the aspect ratio L/D for the finite-volume release. Our results show that the morphology of the cap that develops above the source and the vortical motion induced within are sensitively dependent on the source conditions. Moreover, three rise-height regimes are identified: ‘weak-fountain-transition’, ‘vorticity-development’ and ‘forced-release’ regimes, each with a distinct morphology and dependence of dimensionless rise height on η.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baines, W. D., Turner, J. S. & Campbell, I. H. 1990 Turbulent fountains in an open chamber. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 557592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L. J. & Kerr, R. C. 2000 A theoretical model of a turbulent fountain. J. Fluid Mech. 424, 197216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabiri, J. O. 2009 Optimal vortex formation as a unifying principle in biological propulsion. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gharib, M., Rambod, E. & Shariff, K. 1998 A universal time scale for vortex ring formation. J. Fluid Mech. 360, 121140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, N. B. & Hunt, G. R. 2006 Weak fountains. J. Fluid Mech. 558, 319328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, W. & Armfield, S. W. 2000 Very weak fountains in a homogeneous fluid. Numer. Heat Transfer A 38, 377396.Google Scholar
Marugán-Cruz, C., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J. & Martínez-Bazán, C. 2009 Negatively buoyant starting jets. Phys. Fluids 21, 117101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shariff, K. & Leonard, A. 1992 Vortex rings. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 235279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. S. 1966 Jets and plumes with negative or reversing buoyancy. J. Fluid Mech. 26, 779792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, R. Q., Law, A. W. K., Adams, E. E. & Fringer, O. B. 2009 Buoyant formation number of a starting buoyant jet. Phys. Fluids 21 (12), 125104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, N., Srinarayana, N., Armfield, S. W., McBain, G. D. & Lin, W. 2008 Low-Reynolds-number fountain behaviour. J. Fluid Mech. 608, 297317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H. & Baddour, R. E. 1998 Maximum penetration of vertical round dense jets at small and large Froude numbers. J. Hydraul. Engng 124, 550553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar