Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59df476f6b-pw78b Total loading time: 0.171 Render date: 2021-05-18T22:06:31.862Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Droplet–turbulence interaction in a confined polydispersed spray: effect of droplet size and flow length scales on spatial droplet–gas velocity correlations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2014

S. Sahu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Y. Hardalupas
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
A. M. K. P. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

This paper discusses the interaction between droplets and entrained turbulent air flow in the far-downstream locations of a confined polydispersed isothermal spray. Simultaneous and planar measurements of droplet and gas velocities in the spray along with droplet size are obtained with the application of a novel experimental technique, developed by Hardalupas et al. (Exp. Fluids, vol. 49, 2010, pp. 417–434), which combines interferometric laser imaging for droplet sizing (ILIDS) with particle image velocimetry (PIV). These measurements quantified the spatial correlation coefficients of droplet–gas velocity fluctuations ($R_{dg}$) and droplet–droplet velocity fluctuations ($R_{dd}$) conditional on droplet size classes, for various separation distances, and for axial and cross-stream velocity components. At the measurement location close to the spray edge, with increasing droplet size, $R_{dg}$ was found to increase in axial direction and decrease in cross-stream direction. This suggests that as the gas-phase turbulence becomes more anisotropic away from the spray axis, the gravitational influence on droplet–gas correlated motion tends to increase. The effective length scales of the correlated droplet–gas motion were evaluated and compared with that for gas and droplet motion. The role of different turbulent eddies of the gas flow on the droplet–gas interaction was examined. The flow structures were extracted using proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) of the instantaneous gas velocity data, and their contribution on the spatial droplet–gas velocity correlation was evaluated, which quantified the momentum transfer between the two phases at different length scales of the gas flow. The droplets were observed to augment turbulence for the first three POD modes (larger scales) and attenuate it for the rest of the modes (smaller scales). It has been realized that apart from droplet Stokes number and mass loading, the dynamic range of length scales of the gas flow and the relative turbulent kinetic energy content of the flow structures (POD modes) must be considered in order to conclude if the droplets enhance or reduce the carrier-phase turbulence especially at the lower wavenumbers.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Aliseda, A., Cartellier, A., Hainaux, F. & Lasheras, J. C. 2002 Effect of preferential concentration on the settling velocity of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 468, 77105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubry, N. 1991 On the hidden beauty of the proper orthogonal decomposition. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 2, 339352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayyalasomayajula, S., Gylfason, A., Collins, L. R., Bodenschatz, E. & Warhaft, Z. 2006 Lagrangian measurements of inertial particle accelerations in grid generated wind tunnel turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 144507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balachandar, S. & Eaton, J. K. 2010 Turbulent dispersed multiphase flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 111133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bec, J., Biferale, L., Boffetta, G., Celani, A., Cencini, M., Lanotte, A., Msacchio, S. & Toschi, F. 2006 Two-way interaction between solid particles and homogeneous air turbulence: particle settling rate and turbulence modification measurements. J. Fluid Mech. 550, 349358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, M., Simonin, O. & Squires, K. 1998 Direct numerical simulation of turbulence modulation by particles in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 375, 235263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boree, J., Ishima, T. & Flour, I. 2001 The effect of mass loading and inter-particle collisions on the development of the polydispersed two-phase flow downstream of a confined bluff body. J. Fluid Mech. 443, 129165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowsky, J. F. & Wei, T. 2011 Two-phase interactions through turbulent events as described by fluidparticle correlations. Chem. Engng Sci. 66, 128134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. P. & Wood, P. E. 1985 A turbulence closure model for dilute gas–particle flows. Can. J. Chem. Engng 65, 349360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chien, R. & Chung, J. N. 1987 Effects of vortex pairing on particle-dispersion in turbulent shear flows. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 13, 785802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, C. T., Gore, R. A. & Troutt, T. R. 1985 Particle dispersion by coherent structures in free shear flows. Part. Science Technol. 3, 149158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, C., Sommerfield, M. & Tsuji, Y. 1998 Multiphase Flows with Droplets and Particles. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. K. & Fessler, J. R. 1994 Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 20, 169209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elghobashi, S. 1994 On predicting particle-laden turbulent flows. Appl. Sci. Res. 52, 309329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elghobashi, S. & Abou-Arab, T. W. 1983 A two-equation turbulence model for two-phase flows. Phys. Fluids 26, 931938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrand, V., Bazile, R, Boree, J. & Charnay, G. 2003 Gas-droplet turbulent velocity correlations and two-phase interaction in an axisymmetric jet laden with partly responsive droplets. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 29, 195217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrante, A. & Elghobashi, S. 2003 On the physical mechanism of two-way coupling in particle-laden isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 15, 315329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fessler, J. R., Kulick, J. D. & Eaton, J. K. 1994 Preferential concentration of heavy particles in turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 6, 37423749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fevrier, P., Simonin, O. & Squires, K. 2005 Partitioning of particle velocities in gas–solid turbulent flows into a continuous field and a spatially uncorrelated random distribution: theoretical formalism and numerical study. J. Fluid Mech. 533, 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiss, S., Dreizler, A., Stojanovic, Z., Chrigui, M., Sadiki, A. & Janicka, J. 2004 Investigation of turbulence modification in a non-reactive two-phase flow. Exp. Fluids 36, 344354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, A. R., Skippon, S. M. & Boyle, R. D. 1995 Interferometric laser imaging for droplet sizing: a method for droplet-size measurement in sparse spray systems. Appl. Optics 34, 84098421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gui, L., Wereley, S. T. & Kim, Y. H. 2003 Advances and applications of the digital mask technique in particle image velocimetry experiments. Meas. Sci. Technol. 14, 18201828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardalupas, Y. & Horender, S. 2003 A method to estimate gas–droplet velocity cross correlations in sprays. Atomiz. Sprays 13, 273295.Google Scholar
Hardalupas, Y. & Horender, S 2010 Fluid particle correlated motion and turbulent energy transfer in a two-dimensional particle-laden shear flow. Chem. Engng Sci. 65, 50755091.Google Scholar
Hardalupas, Y., Sahu, S., Taylor, A. M.K. P. & Zarogoulidis, K. 2010 Simultaneous planar measurement of droplet velocity and size with gas phase velocities in a spray by combined ILIDS and PIV techniques. Exp. Fluids 49, 417434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardalupas, Y., Taylor, A. M. K. P. & Whitelaw, J. H. 1989 Velocity and particle-flux characteristics of turbulent particle-laden jets. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 426 (1870), 3178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardalupas, Y., Taylor, A. M. K. P. & Whitelaw, J. H. 1990 Velocity and size characteristics of liquid-fuelled flames stabilized by a swirl burner. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 428 (1874), 129155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardalupas, Y., Taylor, A. M. K. P. & Whitelaw, J. H. 1992 Particle dispersion in a vertical round sudden-expansion flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 411442.Google Scholar
Hwang, W. & Eaton, J. K. 2006 Homogeneous and isotropic turbulence modulation by small heavy (ST 50) particles. J. Fluid Mech. 564, 361393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jong, J., Cao, L., Woodward, S., Salazar, J., Collins, L. & Meng, H. 2009 Dissipation rate estimation from PIV in zero-mean isotropic turbulence. Exp. Fluids 46, 499515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavounides, C.2006 Particle flows in spray dryers. PhD thesis, Imperial College London.Google Scholar
Kawaguchi, T., Akasaka, Y. & Maeda, M. 2002 Size measurements of droplets and bubbles by advanced interferometric laser imaging technique. Meas. Sci. Technol. 13, 308316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalitov, D. A. & Longmire, E. K. 2003 Effect of particle size on velocity correlations in turbulent channel flow. In Proceedings of the 4th ASME–JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, FEDSM03-45730 .Google Scholar
Kiger, K. T. & Pan, C. 2002 Suspension and turbulence modification effects of solid particulates on a horizontal turbulent channel flow. J. Turbul. 3, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulick, J. D., Fessler, J. R. & Eaton, J. K. 1994 Particle response and turbulence modification in fully developed channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 277, 109134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazaro, B. J. & Lasheras, J. C. 1992 Particle dispersion in the developing free shear layer. Part 1 unforced flow. Part 2 forced flow. J. Fluid Mech. 235, 143221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, F., Qi, H. & You, C. 2010 Phase doppler anemometry measurements and analysis of turbulence modulation in dilute gas–solid two-phase shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 663, 434455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longmire, E. K. & Eaton, J. K. 1992 Structure of a particle-laden round jet. J. Fluid Mech. 236, 217257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumley, J. L.1967 The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. In Proceedings of the International Colloqium on the Fine Scale Structure of the Atmosphere and its Influence on Radio Wave Propagation.Google Scholar
Maeda, M., Kawaguchi, T. & Hishida, K. 2000 Novel interferometric measurement of size and velocity distributions of spherical particles in fluid flows. Meas. Sci. Technol. 11, 1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashayek, F. & Taulbee, D. B. 2002 Turbulent gas–solid flows. Part II: explicit algebraic closures. Numer. Heat Transfer, Part B 41, 3152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monchaux, R., Bourgoin, M. & Cartellier, A. 2012 Analyzing preferential concentration and clustering of inertial particles in turbulence. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 40, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, K., Nishio, S., Saga, T. & Kobayashi, T. 2000 Standard images for particle-image velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 11, 685691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poelma, C., Westerweel, J. & Ooms, G. 2007 Particle–fluid interaction in grid-generated turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 589, 315351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, A. K. & Jensen, K. 1995 Scheimpflug stereocamera for particle image velocimetry in liquid flows. Appl. Optics 34, 70927099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prevost, F., Boree, J., Nuclisch, H. J. & Charnay, G. 1996 Measurements of fluid/particle correlated motion in the far field of an axisymmetric jet. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 22, 685701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeks, M. W. 1977 On the dispersion of small particles suspended in an isotropic turbulent fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 83, 529546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risso, F. & Fabre, J. 1997 Diffusive turbulence in a confined jet experiment. J. Fluid Mech. 337, 233261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronneberger, O., Raffel, M. & Kompenhans, J. 1998 Advanced evaluation algorithms for standard and dual plane particle image velocimetry. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, p. 10.1.Google Scholar
Sahu, S.2011 Experimental study of isothermal and evapourative sprays. PhD thesis, Imperial College London.Google Scholar
Sakakibara, J., Wicker, R. B. & Eaton, J. K. 1996 Measurements of the particle–fluid velocity correlation and the extra dissipation in a round jet. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 22, 863881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonin, O., Deutsch, E. & Minier, J. P. 1993 Eulerian prediction of the fluid/particle correlated motion in turbulent two-phase flows. Appl. Sci. Res. 51, 275283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirovich, L. 1987 Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures, Part I, II, III. Q. Appl. Maths 45, 560590.Google Scholar
Squires, K. & Eaton, J. 1990 Particle response and turbulence modification in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 7, 11911203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundaram, S. & Collins, L. 1999 A numerical study of the modulation of isotropic turbulence by suspended particles. J. Fluid Mech. 379, 105143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, T. & Eaton, J. 2010 Sub-Kolmogorov resolution partical image velocimetry measurements of particle-laden forced turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 643, 177206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennekes, H. & Lumley, J. L. 1972 A First Course in Turbulence. MIT.Google Scholar
Tsuji, Y., Morikawa, Y. & Shiomi, H. H. 1984 LDV measurements of an air–solid two-phase flow in a vertical pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 417434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, M. W., Squires, K. D. & Simonin, O. 2006 Properties of the particle velocity field in gas–solid turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 18, 063302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L. P. & Maxey, M. R. 1993 Settling velocity and concentration distribution of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 256, 2768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. M., Hwang, W. & Eaton, J. K. 2005 Preferential concentration of particles in homogeneous and isotropic turbulence. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 31, 12201230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. Y. & Le, I. U. 1998 The role of the turbulent scales on the settling velocity of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 371, 179205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, T. S. & Shy, S. S. 2005 Two-way interaction between solid particles and homogeneous air turbulence: particle settling rate and turbulence modification measurements. J. Fluid Mech. 526, 171216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, L., Domann, R., Hardalupas, Y. & Ikeda, Y. 2003 Simultaneous laser induced fluorescence and Mie scattering for droplet cluster measurements. AIAA J. 41, 21702178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Droplet–turbulence interaction in a confined polydispersed spray: effect of droplet size and flow length scales on spatial droplet–gas velocity correlations
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Droplet–turbulence interaction in a confined polydispersed spray: effect of droplet size and flow length scales on spatial droplet–gas velocity correlations
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Droplet–turbulence interaction in a confined polydispersed spray: effect of droplet size and flow length scales on spatial droplet–gas velocity correlations
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *